Thanks to climate change and wetter weather, forest soils are absorbing less methane

August 6, 2018, Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies
Groffman and his field team have been measuring nutrient uptake and gas exchange in Baltimore area forests for nearly 20 years. Credit: Dan Dillon

Farming, energy production, and landfills produce methane, a potent greenhouse gas. Forests can remove methane from the atmosphere through the activity of soil bacteria. But increasing precipitation—a symptom of climate change—is making it harder for forest soils to trap greenhouse gases, creating a feedback loop that exacerbates global warming.

So reports a new study, published today in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, which concludes that forest soils have been overestimated as methane sinks by upwards of 50% worldwide. Few studies have quantified this process using long-term data.

Study coauthor Peter Groffman, a Senior Research Fellow at Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies and a professor at the City University of New York Advanced Science Research Center at the Graduate Center, explains, "We were interested in how methane uptake by forest soils was influenced by environmental change. Do things like soil temperature, nitrogen, or rainfall impact forest soil's ability to act as a methane sink? And how does this play out over time?"

The Takeaway

Data on forest soil methane uptake was collected from two very different US National Science Foundation funded Long-Term Ecological Research sites. Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest is located in the White Mountains of New Hampshire, while the Baltimore Ecosystem Study encompasses Baltimore County, Maryland. Monitoring was conducted for 14 and 18 years, respectively.

Patterns observed at these locations were compared to global forest soil methane uptake data recorded from 1988-2015. Results were clear: methane absorption by upland forest soils is declining globally, especially in regions where precipitation is increasing.

According to 2016 data from the Global Carbon Project, soil absorbs an estimated 33 teragrams of methane gas each year, but a new study from ASRC researchers suggests that absorption levels may be significantly lower and that more methane may be ending up in the atmosphere. Credit: Global Carbon Project
"These findings suggest that global budgets for atmospheric methane—which are used to inform policy around methane-producing activities—are overestimating the role that forest soils play in trapping gas," Groffman cautions. "Declining methane uptake by forest soils should be factored into these models to avoid exacerbating climate warming, as methane in the atmosphere may rise more quickly and reach higher levels than current models predict."

Shrinking methane sinks, in the country and the city

At the Baltimore Ecosystem Study site, researchers monitored forests at four urban and four comparatively rural sites from 1998-2016. At Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, soil methane uptake was measured at eight forested sites from 2002-2015. These measurements comprise the longest-running record of methane uptake by forest soils.

Over an 18-year period, methane uptake by urban forests in Baltimore declined by 62%; methane uptake by rural forests declined by 53%. At Hubbard Brook, over a 14-year period, methane uptake by forest soils fell by 74-89%.

During this timespan, average temperature and atmospheric methane concentrations increased while nitrogen deposition decreased. These three factors should have caused an increase in forest soil methane uptake.

Baltimore field lead Dan Dillon collects a gas sample. Credit: Laura Templeton
Scaling up: A global perspective

The authors analyzed 317 peer-reviewed journal articles on soil methane uptake in the world's forests published between 1987 and 2015. These records were used to estimate mean methane uptake in forests in 30° latitude bands across the globe—with the goal of examining changes in precipitation and methane uptake in the context of latitudes.

During the timeframe of the analysis, methane uptake by forest soils dropped by 77%. Declines were most acute in forests located between 0-60°N latitude, where precipitation has steadily increased as a result of climate change.

Methanotrophs matter

Why is methane uptake in forest soils reduced when soils are wetter? The answer lies in soil bacteria. Well-drained upland forest soils are home to methane-consuming bacteria called methanotrophs. These bacteria need access to methane in the atmosphere to survive. When soils are wet, diffusion of atmospheric methane into the soil is inhibited, reducing bacterial uptake.

Forest soil methane uptake has been recorded at Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest in the White Mountains of New Hampshire since 2002. Credit: Claire Nemes
Accounting for wetter soils

Precipitation is projected to continue to increase due to climate change, further reducing forest soils' capacity to mitigate rising atmospheric methane emissions.

Lead author Xiangyin Ni of Sichuan Agricultural University notes, "Long-term changes in precipitation and forest soil methane uptake should be factored into models being used to inform policy decisions around methane-producing activities—to ensure that we're using the most accurate tools available to account for methane sources and sinks."

Steve Hamburg, Chief Scientist at the Environmental Defense Fund, explains, "It is increasingly clear that reducing human-caused methane emissions is essential to reducing the risk of climate change. Towards that end, we need a better understanding of the global methane budget and the causes of the increases in atmospheric concentrations. Understanding that the global forest soil sink is weakening is a potentially important piece of the puzzle."

"This study shows large, long-term declines in the ability of soil to absorb methane," says Doug Levey, a director of the National Science Foundation's Long-Term Ecological Research program, which funded the research. "That can explain why the amount of methane, a potent greenhouse gas, has been increasing in the atmosphere. The results uncover an important link among the soil, the atmosphere, and climate."

Groffman concludes, "We can't rely on natural processes to solve our greenhouse gas problems. Just as trees and oceans may not always be able to absorb carbon dioxide, forest soils may not always be able to take up methane and keep it out of the atmosphere. Long-term data are critical for showing how the capacity and function of Earth's ecosystems are changing—and how we might best respond through management actions."

Explore further: First direct observations of methane's increasing greenhouse effect at the Earth's surface

More information: Xiangyin Ni el al., "Declines in methane uptake in forest soils," PNAS (2018).

Related Stories

Thawing permafrost produces more methane than expected

March 20, 2018

Methane (CH4) is a potent greenhouse gas that is roughly 30 times more harmful to the climate than carbon dioxide (CO2). Both gases are produced in thawing permafrost as dead animal and plant remains are decomposed. However, ...

Recommended for you

When a defect might be beneficial

February 19, 2019

In the quest to design more efficient solar cells and light-emitting diodes (LEDs), a team of engineers has analyzed different types of defects in the semiconductor material that enables such devices to determine if and how ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Aug 07, 2018
This study is interesting, and factual, but the article tries to stretch that way too far. The big methane sink is conversion to CO2 in the atmosphere. This rate is effectively determined by the methane available. So a better expression of the rate of methane decomposition is a percentage of the methane in the atmosphere. This is in the high nineties. (It is temperature sensitive, so seasonal.)

This is not a get out of jail free for global warming, it does create more CO2 which has to be dealt with somehow. But the net effect on GHG is a few times that of CO2, depending on dwell time in the atmosphere. (Since CH4 absorbs IR with a different spectrum than CO2 the net effect before conversion is greater.)

Finally, as to the research, it studied soil to atmosphere methane ratios. If methanotrophs are becoming more efficient or adapting to wetter soils it could be that lower methane levels in soils indicate an increase in methane consumption.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.