Urgent change needed to regulate the environmental impacts of chemicals

International study has identified the most important questions that researchers must address in order to help protect our planet over the next decade

Chemicals released by ; such as driving cars, using toiletries and using pesticides, are resulting in a loss of biodiversity, increased natural hazards and presenting threats to food, water and

Research aims to serve as a road map for , regulators, industry and funders

Urgent change is needed to regulate the harmful impact chemicals have on the environment, a new study has revealed.

The international study involving scientists from the University of Sheffield, has identified the most important that researchers must address in order to help protect our planet from chemicals over the next decade.

The research aims to serve as a for policy makers, regulators, industry and funders—setting the research agenda and pioneering a more coordinated approach to the regulation of chemicals.

Chemicals released by human activity—such as driving cars, using toiletries, taking medicines and using pesticides—are resulting in a loss of biodiversity, increased natural hazards and presenting threats to food, water and energy security.

Professor Lorraine Maltby, one of the lead authors of the international study from the University of Sheffield's Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, said: "Until now the regulation of chemicals has been very simplistic. Scientists tend to look at the impact of one on single species in a lab, which doesn't account for the complexity of the .

"Plants and animals in natural environments may be exposed to hundreds of chemicals. A far more holistic approach to assessing the effects of combinations of chemicals and other factors on ecological communities is needed to protect our natural world.

"Every day the shampoo we wash down the drain, the cleaning products we use and the emissions from our cars have a complex effect on our biodiversity. The ecological impact of this exposure may vary due to the presence of other stressors, for example elevated temperature, and the sensitivity of the plants and animals exposed to the chemicals."

She added: "Our research will really help to focus scientific effort on the questions that really matter and inform decisions about the type of investigations needed to update environmental policies and regulations."

The pioneering research is part of a much larger global horizon scanning exercise co-ordinated by the Society for Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. Similar studies are also being performed in North America, Latin America, Africa, Asia and Australasia.

The international team of scientists identified 22 questions which need to be answered in order to fill the most pressing knowledge gaps. They include questions about which chemicals we should be most concerned about, where the hotspots of key contaminants are around the globe and how we can develop methods to protect biodiversity and ecosystems.

Professor Maltby said: "A lot of chemicals such as pesticides and medicines obviously have a huge benefit for people but it is important to consider the environmental cost too in order to strike a balance.

"By prioritising 22 questions we hope that scientists will be able to identify which chemicals to target first and also the most vulnerable areas."


Explore further

Scientists identify most pressing issues posed by chemicals in the environment

More information: Paul J. Van den Brink et al, Toward sustainable environmental quality: Priority research questions for Europe, Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (2018). DOI: 10.1002/etc.4205
Citation: Urgent change needed to regulate the environmental impacts of chemicals (2018, July 20) retrieved 19 July 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2018-07-urgent-environmental-impacts-chemicals.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
20 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Jul 20, 2018
I agree with the article. Human behavior can be very destructive to the environment, even inconsequential like in the treatment of daily waste. Just plastics alone are now finding there way into the food chain. Think about that one for a moment, is that hamburger plastic free? Yikes.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more