How do religious ideologies spread?

July 31, 2018, Max Planck Society
The chiefs Waikato and Hongi Hika with missionary Thomas Kendall, Oil on canvas by James Barry, 1820. Credit: National Library of New Zealand Te Puna Mātauranga o Aotearoa, Alexander Turnbull Library, Wellington (Ref:G-618)

Over the last 2000 years Christianity has grown from a tiny religious sect to the largest family of religions in the world. How did Christianity become so successful? Did Christianity spread through grass-roots movements or political elites? And what can the spread of Christianity tell us about how widespread social change happens?

A paper published today in Nature Human Behaviour uses new computational cross-cultural methods to help answer these questions. The research tested how political hierarchies, social inequality, and affected the spread of Christianity in 70 Austronesian societies.

Austronesian societies shared a common ancestral language and are located across Southeast Asia, East Africa and the South Pacific. Historically, they ranged from very small egalitarian family-based communities to large politically complex societies such as Hawaii. Conversion typically happened in the 18th and 19th centuries, and while some societies took less than a year to convert, others took up to 205 years. The range of social structures and conversion histories makes Austronesian societies ideal for theories about how cultural change happens.

The results of the study show that cultures with political leadership structures were often the fastest to convert to Christianity. This supports a "top-down" process of conversion whereby chiefs and elite leaders, themselves converted by missionaries, were highly influential in spreading Christian doctrine among their people.

In contrast, was not related to conversion times. This challenges one of the most widely-cited reasons for Christianity's popularity, that it spread from the "bottom-up" by empowering lower classes and promising to improve the lives of the less privileged in the afterlife.

The research also found that Christianity spread most quickly among small populations. This helps clarify the importance of population size in processes of cultural change.

"While people often think of big societies as sources of innovation, our findings show that bigger societies can also be slow to pick up on new ideas," says lead author Dr. Joseph Watts who undertook the research at the University of Auckland's School of Psychology and at the Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History in Jena, Germany. "In a small population, it becomes more likely that beliefs will be transmitted relatively quickly, particularly if they are being driven by leaders and other powerful figures."

Dr. Watts says the findings provide significant insight into large-scale human behaviour and the process of cultural change, a fascinating aspect of human life. "If you look at our contemporary world, some things spread incredibly quickly while others take a very long time so here we provide evidence of why that might be."

University of Auckland Professor Quentin Atkinson, a researcher in this study, says that finding new answers about how beliefs have spread in the past gives us insight into how they might spread in the future. "This research can help us understand how both the size and the structure of populations influence the diffusion and adoption of new institutions, ideologies or technologies."

The study was undertaken in collaboration with researchers at the University of Auckland in New Zealand and the Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History in Germany. The research team also includes doctoral candidate Oliver Sheehan, Professor Joseph Bulbulia, and Professor Russell Gray.

Explore further: Intensification of agriculture and social hierarchies evolve together, study finds

More information: Joseph Watts et al. Christianity spread faster in small, politically structured societies, Nature Human Behaviour (2018). DOI: 10.1038/s41562-018-0379-3

Related Stories

Identifying major transitions in human cultural evolution

July 26, 2017

Over the past 10,000 years human cultures have expanded from small groups of hunter-gatherers to colossal and complexly organized societies. The secrets to how and why this major cultural transition occurred have largely ...

The Danes do not abandon church Christianity

October 21, 2013

New research from University of Copenhagen shows that Danes are not abandoning their communal Protestant religion in favor of individualized spirituality such as meditation and mindfulness; the support for Christian faith ...

Pacific people spread from Taiwan

January 22, 2009

New research into language evolution suggests most Pacific populations originated in Taiwan around 5,200 years ago.

Recommended for you

Fat from 558 million years ago reveals earliest known animal

September 20, 2018

Scientists from The Australian National University (ANU) and overseas have discovered molecules of fat in an ancient fossil to reveal the earliest confirmed animal in the geological record that lived on Earth 558 million ...

6 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Claudius
5 / 5 (1) Jul 31, 2018
Terror and warfare? At least history seems to indicate this is how religions spread.
Surveillance_Egg_Unit
4 / 5 (4) Aug 01, 2018
The early missionaries were often murdered by some of those which they were attempting to convert by preaching the words/concepts that were not necessarily understood by everyone in the, perhaps uncivilised, community. Without sufficient prior education, the masses were sometimes conflicted over what they were being taught and what they had already known, usually from childhood. As to terror and warfare, missionaries most often had a full complement of military at their disposal, to prevent terror. Warfare could occur when the opposition, whether religious or political, became radicalised enough to wage war on the intruders, most often unsuccessful.

Then there were those members of the community who desired power and control over their neighbours and who had every intention of knocking the leaders out from power...if at all possible. The Christian afterlife was far from their mind, and only THIS life mattered.
Surveillance_Egg_Unit
5 / 5 (3) Aug 01, 2018
Religions are a man-made conception that is declarative of something better; something more desirable; and although more obtrusive in one's life, in the long run it becomes an improvement over the current situation(s)...or at least, it is supposed to.

Religions most often expound on the afterlife, what is to come rather than what is in the here and now. Those who are suffering in the now and are unable to gain any relief from it will often reject religion while they are hurting. That is the human condition and religion is supposed to alleviate human suffering. Praying, talking it over, confession and self-education are often helpful.

But religion of the Judea-Christian kind is relatively recent phenomenon and is of (what I call) a Hebrewcentric adaptation of the Universal Genesis through belief in a Jewish God, when the True God of Creation concept predated any relevancy of the Hebraic religious posturing.
yep
5 / 5 (1) Aug 01, 2018
Having the Roman State back you and policy in the new world like we will cut off your foot if you don't convert went a long way.
Surveillance_Egg_Unit
5 / 5 (2) Aug 03, 2018
I think it was the Spanish Conquistadors who arrived in the New World first, subsequently conquering the Natives and forcing them to convert and accept the Catholic Church doctrines. But then, religions are, after all, manmade.
Thorium Boy
3 / 5 (2) Aug 06, 2018
There is no indication atheism produces more benevolent results. In-fact, communists killed over 100 million since the turn of the 19th century, vastly eclipsing religious states.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.