Sculpted head of mystery biblical king found in Israel

June 9, 2018 by Ilan Ben Zion
Sculpted head of mystery biblical king found in Israel
This Monday, June 4, 2018 photo shows a detailed figurine of a king's head on display at the Israel Museum, dating to biblical times, and found last year near Israel's northern border with Lebanon, in Jerusalem. A palm-sized enigmatic sculpture of a king's head dating back nearly 3,000 years has set off a modern-day mystery caper as scholars try to figure out whose face it depicts. The 5-centimeter (2-inch) head is an exceedingly rare example of figurative art from the Holy Land during the 9th century BC, a period associated with biblical kings. (AP Photo/Ilan Ben Zion)

An enigmatic sculpture of a king's head dating back nearly 3,000 years has set off a modern-day mystery caper as scholars try to figure out whose face it depicts.

The 5-centimeter (2-inch) sculpture is an exceedingly rare example of figurative art from the Holy Land during the 9th century B.C.—a period associated with biblical kings. Exquisitely preserved but for a bit of missing beard, nothing quite like it has been found before.

While scholars are certain the stern bearded figure donning a golden crown represents royalty, they are less sure which king it symbolizes, or which kingdom he may have ruled.

Archaeologists unearthed the diminutive figurine in 2017 during excavations at a site called Abel Beth Maacah, located just south of Israel's border with Lebanon, near the modern-day town of Metula.

Nineteenth-century archaeologists identified the site, then home to a village called Abil al-Qamh, with the similarly named city mentioned in the Book of Kings.

During the 9th century B.C., the ancient town was situated in a liminal zone between three regional powers: the Aramean kingdom based in Damascus to the east, the Phoenician city of Tyre to the west, and the Israelite kingdom, with its capital in Samaria to the south.

Kings 1 15:20 mentions Abel Beth Maacah in a list of cities attacked by the Aramean King Ben Hadad in a campaign against the Israelite kingdom.

"This location is very important because it suggests that the site may have shifted hands between these polities, more likely between Aram-Damascus and Israel," said Hebrew University archaeologist Naama Yahalom-Mack, who has headed the joint dig with California's Azusa Pacific University since 2013.

Yahalom-Mack's team was digging through the floor of a massive Iron Age structure in the summer of 2017 when a volunteer who arrived for the day struck pay dirt. The layer where the head was found dates to the 9th century B.C., the epoch associated with the rival biblical kingdoms of Israel and Judah.

In a rare move, archaeologists and curators at the Israel Museum in Jerusalem rushed to put the piece on public display. A detailed report is set for publication in the June edition of the journal Near Eastern Archaeology.

Eran Arie, the Israel Museum's curator of Iron Age and Persian archaeology, said the discovery was one of a kind. "In the Iron Age, if there's any figurative art, and there largely isn't, it's of very low quality. And this is of exquisite quality."

The royal figurine is made of faience, a glass-like material that was popular in jewelry and small human and animal figurines in ancient Egypt and the Near East.

"The color of the face is greenish because of this copper tint that we have in the silicate paste," Yahalom-Mack said. But a crucial clue for identifying it as a Near Eastern monarch was its "very interesting hairdo," she said.

The bearded figure's hair is pulled back in thick locks that cover the ears, and is held in place by a striped diadem of gold. Its hairstyle looks similar to the way ancient Egyptians depicted neighboring Near Eastern peoples in art.

"The guy kind of represents the generic way Semitic people are described," she said.

Because Carbon-14 dating cannot give a more exact date for the statue's creation other than sometime in the 9th century, the field of potential candidates is large. Yahalom-Mack posited it could be kings Ben Hadad or Hazael of Damascus, Ahab or Jehu of Israel, or Ithobaal of Tyre, all characters appearing in the biblical narrative.

"We're only guessing here, it's like a game," she said. "It's like a hello from the past, but we don't know anything else about it."

As scholars debate whether the head was a stand-alone piece or part of a larger statue, the Hebrew University team is set to restart digging this month at the spot where the mystery king's head was found.

Explore further: Archaeologists uncover entrance gate and fortification of Biblical city

Related Stories

King David's palace found, says Israeli team

July 21, 2013

(AP)—A team of Israeli archaeologists believes it has discovered the ruins of a palace belonging to the biblical King David, but other Israeli experts dispute the claim.

Recommended for you

Why war is a man's game

August 15, 2018

No sex differences in attitudes or abilities are needed to explain the near absence of women from the battlefield in ancient societies and throughout history, it could ultimately all be down to chance, say researchers at ...

6 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

granville583762
2.7 / 5 (7) Jun 10, 2018
The multiplicity of religions to rule over
The 5-centimeter (2-inch) sculpture is an exceedingly rare example of figurative art from the Holy Land during the 9th century B.C.—a period associated with biblical kings

A period associated with biblical kings? What biblical kings, do these biblical kings hold sway over their chiefdoms.

How many religions were there to become a biblical king to rule over to send the your biblical robin hood of a tax collector to pay for your lavish life style.

And finally did they wage war against apposing biblical kings to maintain their chiefdoms as they do to this present day!
rrwillsj
2 / 5 (4) Jun 10, 2018
I am wondering what were the results of metallurgical analysis?

Tracing the metals and alloys used in producing this object might give at least a rough locations for the original mining sites. Of course those metals could have been traded across long distances.

For instance, what is the alloy of the gold crown? The purer the gold the more sophisticated the techniques to produce that level of craftsmanship.

The glass itself, I would presume could be traced to a local manufacture. All the charcoal, sand, gypsum, etc, and the labor to produce such materials would require a large, wealthy community able to support a college of artisans.

I doubt if Israel or Judah had the economic resources or skilled labor to produce such a work of art.

Than again, wouldn't such a creation have been considered a blasphemous act? Golden idols and all that. Also, the Israelite's originated as refugees fleeing Egypt. Wouldn't they copy the artforms of the Egyptians?
Mmanx
2.7 / 5 (7) Jun 10, 2018
Looks vaguely like Artaxerxes III, the king of the Persians who ruled over Israel, but that would make it less than 2,500 years old. Perhaps, if significantly older then it's Assyrian, or maybe Phoenician. But, it definitely cannot be biblical because there is absolutely no archaeological evidence of either Judaism, or Christianity, existing before around 60 AD.
NoStrings
1.8 / 5 (10) Jun 10, 2018
And this is called science? This is even of less importance than dark matter fantasies.
Does it have to be a specific forgotten warlord? Maybe that was a part of a toy? Maybe they had thousands of these toys because it made good living to make them for children? A kingy looking toy - children are suckers for that. And a toy maker 500 years ahead of his age; pure genius.

So they say: hey, we found this piece of rubble. It must be important. Let us imagine how important we can imagine it. Funding depends on it's importance.

Else - What journal would publish an article saying: we found a head of a toy from 3K years ago?
Surveillance_Egg_Unit
3.7 / 5 (3) Jun 11, 2018
In a much later era it could have been a chess piece had it been found in Tel Aviv.
torbjorn_b_g_larsson
not rated yet Jun 25, 2018
I would say "pre-biblical" times, becuase the texts that were eventually incorporated into that collection were written around 2,400 years ago (see the Dead Sea Scroll find of early, incomplete versions). And as Mmanx imply, there were many religious cults that used these texts and several centuries later congealed to the surviving ones that "biblical scholars" obsess over.

@NoStrings: The archaeology part is sound, the "biblical history" shoehorning into religious myths is not.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.