Fungi respire millennium-old carbon from Antarctic soil

May 30, 2018, British Antarctic Survey
Fungi respire millennium-old carbon from Antarctic soil
Credit: British Antarctic Survey

Fungi in Antarctic soils release carbon, as carbon dioxide, that is more than a thousand years old, a team led by scientists at the British Antarctic Survey (BAS) has found. This discovery sheds light on how carbon is released into the atmosphere as polar regions warm.

The findings, published this month (May 2018) in Nature Scientific Reports, show for the first time that different species of fungi decompose components of soil to respire of different ages, including ancient carbon which was fixed from the atmosphere up to 1,200 years ago.

Soil from under Antarctic Hairgrass was taken from Léonie Island, near Rothera Research Station on the Antarctic Peninsula, and brought back to BAS headquarters in Cambridge. The sterilised soils were inoculated with fungi from the natural Antarctic environment, put into sealed jars and incubated at 4 °C in the lab.

The emitted by the fungi from the soils was collected and analysed by the NERC Radiocarbon Facility. To their surprise, the scientists found that some of the carbon was about 1,200 years old.

BAS ecologist and lead author Dr Kevin Newsham said: "This was an unexpected finding, showing carbon that had originally been fixed from the atmosphere from as far back as around 800 AD is stored in soil under grasses on the Antarctic Peninsula. We know that processes are very slow in the cold environment of Antarctica, but carbon could be stored in undecomposed organic matter of Antarctic soils for much longer than we previously thought.

"This is important if we want to understand which carbon fractions are released into the atmosphere as temperatures rise in ."

It is predicted that a significant amount of carbon will be respired from thawed layers of permafrost by soil microbes as the Earth's climate warms (and more so in the Arctic, where there is far more soil and peat than in the Antarctic), and so determining the decomposition processes influencing its release to the atmosphere is pivotal to understanding the carbon cycle and impacts on the biosphere.

Explore further: Study finds that soil carbon may not be as stable as previously thought

More information: Kevin K. Newsham et al. Discrete taxa of saprotrophic fungi respire different ages of carbon from Antarctic soils, Scientific Reports (2018). DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-25877-9

Related Stories

Securing the UK's natural carbon storage

May 17, 2018

The UK's spectacular scenery attracts millions of visitors from around the world. Iconic heath, peatland and sea lochs don't just look beautiful though. They are shaped by the changing climate.

Carbon dioxide biggest player in thawing permafrost

June 13, 2016

Carbon dioxide emissions from dry and oxygen-rich environments are likely to play a much greater role in controlling future rates of climate change caused by permafrost thaw than rates of methane release from oxygen-poor ...

Recommended for you

4 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Shootist
1 / 5 (2) May 30, 2018
Fungi in Antarctic soils release carbon, as carbon dioxide, that is more than a thousand years old


It's a conspiracy!
SteveS
5 / 5 (2) May 30, 2018
Fungi in Antarctic soils release carbon, as carbon dioxide, that is more than a thousand years old


It's a conspiracy!


You mean the fungi are in on it as well !

OMG we don't stand a chance
Ojorf
3 / 5 (2) May 31, 2018
Yeah we are fucked! Now that the fungi are in cahoots with those unscrupulous money hungry scientists, the rest of the ecosystem is sure to follow. Stupid life! Why is it it all against us?
humy
not rated yet May 31, 2018
To their surprise, the scientists found that some of the carbon was about 1,200 years old.

Well, that is a huge surprising! And I thought that carbon was forged in stars billions of years ago via stellar nuceosythesis thus that carbon is BILLIONS of years old, not merely 1,200 years old!

https://en.wikipe...ynthesis

I wish they wouldn't make such badly thought out confusing assertions without any consideration of how the reader might misinterpret them. Please be unambiguous.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.