Two species of ravens nevermore? New research finds evidence of 'speciation reversal'

Two species of ravens nevermore? New research finds evidence of 'speciation reversal'
A raven is shown in the rain. Credit: Bjørn Aksel Bjerke/University of Oslo

For over a century, speciation—where one species splits into two—has been a central focus of evolutionary research. But a new study almost 20 years in the making suggests "speciation reversal"—where two distinct lineages hybridize and eventually merge into one—can also be extremely important. The paper, appearing March 2 in Nature Communications, provides some of the strongest evidence yet of the phenomenon, in two lineages of Common Ravens.

"The bottom line is [speciation reversal] is a natural evolutionary process, and it's probably happened in hundreds or almost certainly thousands of lineages all over the planet," said Kevin Omland, professor of biological sciences at University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC) and co-author on the new study. "One of our biggest goals is to just have people aware of this process, so when they see interesting patterns in their data, they won't say, 'That must be a mistake,' or, 'That's too complicated to be correct.'"

"We examined genomic data from hundreds of ravens collected across North America," said Anna Kearns, the study's first author and a former postdoctoral fellow at UMBC, who is now a postdoc at the Smithsonian Center for Conservation Genomics. "Integrating all of the results across so many individuals, and from such diverse datasets, has been one of the most challenging aspects of this study. Next-generation genomic techniques are revealing more and more examples of species with hybrid genomes."

When Omland initially began work on this project in 1999, Common Ravens were considered a single species worldwide. He thought further research might uncover two distinct species—perhaps an "Old World" and "New World" —but the real story is much more complicated. Omland reported the existence of two Common Raven lineages in 2000, one concentrated in the southwestern United States dubbed "California," and another found everywhere else (including Maine, Alaska, Norway and Russia) called "Holarctic."

Two species of ravens nevermore? New research finds evidence of 'speciation reversal'
A raven is shown perching in the snow. Credit: Bjørn Aksel Bjerke/University of Oslo

Since then, the plot has thickened. Two undergraduates in Omland's lab, Jin Kim and Hayley Richardson, analyzed mitochondrial DNA from throughout the western United States and found the two lineages are extensively intermixed. In 2012, the Norwegian Research Council provided major funding for the project and Kearns spent a year at the University of Oslo analyzing nuclear genome data.

The best explanation based on the team's analysis is that the California and Holarctic lineages diverged for between one and two million years, but now have come back together and have been hybridizing for at least tens of thousands of years.

"The extensive genetic data reveals one of the best supported examples of speciation reversal of deeply diverged lineages to date," said Arild Johnsen, professor of zoology and evolutionary biology at University of Oslo and another leader of the study. "The biggest thing is the degree to which we've caught them in the act."

How does this relate to people? Humans are also a product of speciation reversal, Omland notes, with the present-day human genome including significant chunks of genetic material from Neanderthals and Denisovans, another less well-known hominid lineage. Recent genetic studies have even indicated a mysterious fourth group of early humans who also left some DNA in our genomes.

Two species of ravens nevermore? New research finds evidence of 'speciation reversal'
A pair of ravens interact on a branch. Credit: Bjørn Aksel Bjerke/University of Oslo

"Because speciation reversal is a big part of our own history," Omland said, "getting a better understanding of how that happens should give us a better sense of who we are and where we came from. These are existential questions, but they are also medically relevant as well."

Next steps in the current avian research include analyzing genetic data from ravens who lived in the early 1900s to investigate the potential role of humans in the speciation reversal process. "Getting out of such old, degraded specimens is challenging," Kearns said, "and all work must be done in a special 'ancient DNA' lab at the Smithsonian's Center for Conservation Genomics."

If those ravens have a similar distribution of genes from the Holarctic and California lineages as the ravens living today, it's unlikely changes in human civilization over the last century played a role.

Co-author John Marzluff, professor of wildlife science at the University of Washington, summed up the experience of being part of the study: "It is fascinating to me that this complex history of raven speciation has been revealed. For decades my students and I held and studied ravens throughout the West and never once suspected they carried evidence of a complex past," he said. "Thanks to collaborations among field workers and geneticists, we now understand that the raven is anything but common."


Explore further

Green toads with multiple genomes have ancestors that are only distantly related

More information: Anna M. Kearns et al. Genomic evidence of speciation reversal in ravens, Nature Communications (2018). DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-03294-w
Journal information: Nature Communications

Citation: Two species of ravens nevermore? New research finds evidence of 'speciation reversal' (2018, March 2) retrieved 24 August 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2018-03-species-ravens-nevermore-evidence-speciation.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
249 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Mar 02, 2018
ravens evolve into...ravens!

Mar 02, 2018
The definition of "species" are groups that cannot interbreed and produce fertile young. For two already existing "species" to "reverse speciate" would require the two species, which, by definition, cannot interbreed, to produce fertile young. It sounds very much like a desperate attempt to preserve the reputation of whoever said there were two different species of crows.

Mar 02, 2018
julianpenrod, that is only one of several different definitions of 'species'.

Also, ravens are not "crows", they're a separate type of corvid as different from crows as jays are. There are a LOT of different species of crow, too.

Mar 02, 2018
julianpenrod
your "definition" of what determines a species is not viable if it it presumes that different species can not produce fertile progeny. That never has been a criteria; in thousands of species hybrids occur commonly.

Mar 02, 2018
well, that explains why some of us still drag our knuckles around the city. smh

Mar 03, 2018
jpr, as a generalization I would agree with your comment.

However, the Britamerican language is such a morass of cannibalized dialects, missedcommunications and deliberately falsified interpretations of incompetently translated long-deceased tongues. With a heavy dosages of cunning linguistics. Enough too make a bad situation even worse!

This is a case where all the commentators are correct but not accurate.

Whee! Isn't Science fun?

Mar 03, 2018
The speciation never went far enough to create two populations that could not interbreed. Before that happened, some environmental pressure drove the two groups back together. They were never referred to as separate species, but rather separate lineages.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more