Internet overseers weigh website owner privacy

The nonprofit Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers began a weeklong meeting focused on the fate of the public Who
The nonprofit Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers began a weeklong meeting focused on the fate of the public Whois database, which shows contact information for those who own websites

The group overseeing Internet addresses is scrambling to balance the privacy of website owners and the right to know who is behind online pages.

The nonprofit Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) began a weeklong meeting Monday focused on the fate of the public Whois database, which shows contact for those who own websites.

A General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) set to take effect in the European Union on May 25 could make revealing personal information about owners in Whois illegal.

This week's ICANN meeting in Puerto Rico is the last before the GDPR deadline.

"We will try to find a path forward," ICANN global domains division president Akram Atallah told AFP in a telephone interview.

"There is a lot of work still to be done, but we are working as fast as possible."

While the GDPR backs the right of people to "be forgotten" online, it raises the question of whether to shield personally identifying information about website owners listed in a Whois directory created by ICANN for transparency.

The GDPR applies to people, not organizations with fictitious names, but comes into play if individuals are somehow identified, according to ICANN.

Problems arise, for example, if a company name or email address is the same as the person who owns it.

If ICANN were to simply discontinue the Whois index in Europe, that could create a haven for those from other parts of the world who want to hide which websites they own.

ICANN's understanding is that Whois information can be published, as long as the nonprofit group can justify that doing so is in the public interest.

"We propose trying to keep as much of the policy we have unchanged while being in compliance with the law," Atallah said.

Who sees Whois?

ICANN is refining a plan to divide Whois into two tiers—one open to the public as is currently the case and a second that could be accessed as needed by police, researchers or others with legitimate queries.

It remained to be determined whether journalists would get access, according to Atallah.

"We are asking agencies in Europe for their advice on the plan and if it works," Atallah said.

Some behind websites complain that having contact information available to the public at Whois brings the potential for spam or even physical violence, according to ICANN.

Meanwhile, much focus has been put being able to find out who is behind websites or services to guard against cons or malicious manipulation of public opinion.

"We are trying to strike a balance," Atallah said.

ICANN contracts with registered website owners require them to provide identifying information for Whois, but that clause would be invalid if it was made illegal.

"We hope that we can actually get the ICANN community to agree on a middle ground," Atallah said.

"This is forcing the issue."

The ICANN meeting ends Friday.

Explore further

Hackers trick way into ICANN computers

© 2018 AFP

Citation: Internet overseers weigh website owner privacy (2018, March 12) retrieved 27 June 2019 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Mar 16, 2018
This so-called controversy is all about shrouding info execs from liability for their criminal activities.

Privacy is as obsolete as the spinning wheel or the tickertape machine.

You can fool yourself that you have privacy but the reality is the hacks start all the way back at the circuit-board design stage. Run through the communications networks. Through the backdoors within every bite of code.

People publicly worry (for good reason) about their financial and medical records.

But the real reason is very personal human nature. Everybody fears that their choices in porn becoming public knowledge. The fear of embarrassment and being laughed at for their choices.

Ohh, ain't those goats cute?!

We all wanted progress. We all wanted to play with the shiny, new toys. We got what we were convinced we needed. And the loss of privacy is only one of many sea-changes brought about by our own evolving technology.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more