Project Lyra, a mission to chase down that interstellar asteroid

November 24, 2017 by Matt Williams, Universe Today
Artist’s impression of the first interstellar asteroid, "Oumuamua". This unique object was discovered on 19 October 2017 by the Pan-STARRS 1 telescope in Hawaii. Credit: ESO/M. Kornmesser

Back in October, the announcement that the first interstellar asteroid triggered a flurry of excitement. Since that time, astronomers have conducted follow-up observations of the object known as 1I/2017 U1 (aka. 'Oumuamua) and noted some rather interesting things about it. For example, from rapid changes in its brightness, it has been determined that the asteroid is rocky and metallic, and rather oddly-shaped.

Observations of the asteroid's orbit have also revealed that it made its closest pass to our Sun back in September of 2017, and it is currently on its way back to interstellar space. Because of the mysteries this body holds, there are those who are advocating that it be intercepted and explored. One such group is Project Lyra, which recently released a study detailing the challenges and benefits such a would present.

The study, which recently appeared online under the title "Project Lyra: Sending a Spacecraft to 1I/'Oumuamua (former A/2017 U1), the Interstellar Asteroid", was conducted by members of the Initiative for Interstellar Studies (i4iS) – a volunteer organization that is dedicated to making interstellar space travel a reality in the near future. The study was supported by Asteroid Initiatives LLC, an asteroid-prospecting company that is dedicated to facilitating the exploration and commercial exploitation of asteroids.

To recap, when 'Oumuamua was first observed on October 19th, 2017, by astronomers using the University of Hawaii's Panoramic Survey Telescope and Rapid Response System (Pan-STARRS), the object (then known as C/2017 U1) was initially believed to be a comet. However, subsequent observations revealed that it was actually an asteroid and it was renamed 1I/2017 U1 (or 1I/`Oumuamua).

Follow-up observations made using the ESO's Very Large Telescope (VLT) were able to place constraints on the asteroid's size, brightness, composition, color and orbit. These revealed that `Oumuamua measured some 400 meters (1312 feet) long, is very elongated, and spins on its axis every 7.3 hours – as indicated by the way its brightness varies by a factor of ten.

It was also determined to be rocky and metal rich, and to contain traces of tholins – organic molecules that have been irradiated by UV radiation. The asteroid also has an extremely hyperbolic orbit – with an eccentricity of 1.2 – which is currently taking it out of our Solar System. Preliminary calculations of its orbit also indicated that it originally came from the general direction of Vega, the brightest star in the northern constellation of Lyra.

Given that this asteroid is extra-solar in nature, a mission that would be capable of studying it up close could certainly tell us a great deal about the system in which it formed. It's arrival in our system has also raised awareness about extra-solar asteroids, a new class of interstellar object that astronomers now estimate arrive in our system at a rate of about one per year.

Because of this, the team behind Project Lyra believe that studying 1I/`Oumuamua would be a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity. As they state in their study:

"As 1I/'Oumuamua is the nearest macroscopic sample of interstellar material, likely with an isotopic signature distinct from any other object in our solar system, the scientific returns from sampling the object are hard to understate. Detailed study of interstellar materials at interstellar distances are likely decades away, even if Breakthrough Initiatives' Project Starshot, for example, is vigorously pursued. Hence, an interesting question is if there is a way to exploit this unique opportunity by sending a spacecraft to 1I/'Oumuamua to make observations at close range."

But of course, rendezvousing with this asteroid presents many challenges. The most obvious is that of speed, and the fact that 1I/`Oumuamua is already on its way out of our Solar System. Based on calculations of the asteroid's orbit, it has been determined that 1I/`Oumuamua is traveling at a speed of 26 km/s – which works out to 95,000 km/hour (59,000 mph).

No mission in the history of space exploration has traveled this fast, and the fastest missions to date have only been able to manage about two-thirds that speed. This includes the fastest spaceship to leave the Solar System (Voyager 1) and the fastest spaceship at launch (the New Horizons mission). So creating a mission that could catch up to it would be a major challenge. As the team wrote:

"This [is] considerably faster than any object humanity has ever launched into space. Voyager 1, the fastest object humanity has ever built, has a hyperbolic excess velocity of 16.6 km/s. As 1I/'Oumuamua is already leaving our solar system, any spacecraft launched in the future would need to chase it."

However, as they go on to state, taking on this challenge would inevitably result in key innovations and developments in space exploration technology. Obviously, the launch of such a mission would need to happen sooner other than later, given the asteroid's rapid rate of travel. But any mission that is launched within a few years' time will not be able to take advantage of later technical developments.

As famed writer Paul Glister, one of the founders of the Tau Zero Foundation and the creator of Centauri Dreams, noted on his website:

"The challenge is formidable: 1I/'Oumuamua has a hyperbolic excess velocity of 26 km/s, which translates to a velocity of 5.5 AU/year. It will be beyond Saturn's orbit within two years. This is much faster than any object humanity has ever launched into space."

As such, any mission mounted to 1I/`Oumuamua would entail three notable trade-offs. These include the trade-off between travel time and delta V (i.e. the velocity of the spacecraft), the trade-off between the launch date and travel time, and the trade-off between the launch date/trip time and the characteristic energy. Characteristic energy (C3) refers to the square of the hyperbolic excess velocity, or the velocity at infinity with respect to the Sun.

Last, but not least, is the trade-off between the spacecraft's excess velocity at launch and its excess velocity relative to the asteroid during the encounter. Excess velocity is preferable at launch, since it will result in shorter travel times. But a high excess velocity during the encounter would mean the spacecraft would have less time to conduct measurements and gather data on the asteroid itself.

With all that accounted for, the team then considers various possibilities for creating a spacecraft that would rely on an impulsive propulsion system (i.e. one with sufficiently short-duration thrust). In addition, they assume that this mission would not involve any planetary or solar fly-bys, and would fly directly to 1I/`Oumuamua. From this, some basic parameters are established which they then lay out.

"To summarize, the difficulty of reaching 1I/'Oumuamua is a function of when to launch, the hyperbolic excess velocity, and the mission duration," they indicate. "Future mission designers would need to find appropriate trade-offs between these parameters. For a realistic launch date in 5 to 10 years, the hyperbolic excess velocity is of the order of 33 to up to 76 km/s with an encounter at a distance far beyond Pluto (50-200AU)."

Last, but not least, the authors consider various mission architectures that are currently being developed. These include those that would prioritize urgency (i.e. launching within a few years' time), like NASA's Space Launch System (SLS) – which they claim would simplify the design of the mission. Another is SpaceX's Big Falcon Rocket (BFR), which they claim could enable a direct mission by 2025 thanks to its in-space refueling technique.

However, these types of missions would also require a Jupiter flyby in order to provide a gravity-assist. Looking to more long-term techniques, which would emphasize more advanced technologies, they also consider solar sail-driven technology. This is exemplified by Breakthrough Initiatives' Starshot concept, which would provide mission flexibility and the ability to react quickly to future unexpected events.

While this approach would entail waiting, possibility for future encounters with an interstellar asteroid, it would allow for quick response and a mission that could do away with gravity assists. It could also enable a particularly attractive mission concept, which is to send tiny swarms of probes to rendezvous with the asteroid. While this would entail significant investment, the value of the infrastructure would justify the expense, they claim.

In the end, the team determined that further research and development is necessary, which underwrites the importance of Project Lyra. As they concluded:

"[A] mission to the object will stretch the boundary of what is technologically possible today. A mission using conventional chemical propulsion system would be feasible using a Jupiter flyby to gravity- assist into a close encounter with the Sun. Given the right materials, solar sail technology or laser sails could be used… Future work within Project Lyra will focus on analyzing the different mission concepts and technology options in more detail and to down select 2 – 3 promising concepts for further development."

It is an age-old axiom that daunting challenges are essential to innovation and change. In this respect, the appearance of `Oumuamua in our Solar System has stimulated interest in exploring interstellar asteroids. And while an opportunity to explore this asteroid may not be possible in the next few years, the arrival of future rocky interlopers in our System might just be reachable.

Explore further: ESO observations show first interstellar asteroid is like nothing seen before

More information: Arxiv: arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1711/1711.03155.pdf

Related Stories

Small asteroid or comet 'visits' from beyond the solar system

October 26, 2017

A small, recently discovered asteroid - or perhaps a comet - appears to have originated from outside the solar system, coming from somewhere else in our galaxy. If so, it would be the first "interstellar object" to be observed ...

Astronauts to bring asteroid back into lunar orbit

August 7, 2017

Future space exploration aims to fly further from Earth than ever before. Now, Italian Space Agency scientists have expressed an interest in contributing to the development of robotic technologies to bring an asteroid from ...

Recommended for you

How massive can neutron stars be?

January 16, 2018

Astrophysicists at Goethe University Frankfurt set a new limit for the maximum mass of neutron stars: They cannot exceed 2.16 solar masses.

Black hole spin cranks-up radio volume

January 12, 2018

Statistical analysis of supermassive black holes suggests that the spin of the black hole may play a role in the generation of powerful high-speed jets blasting radio waves and other radiation across the universe.

14 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

rrwillsj
3 / 5 (2) Nov 24, 2017
Even though there is small chance of a successful rendezvous with 1I/2017 U1 'Oumuamua'.

I am of the opinion that accumulating the robotic resources for such a mission would be a smart investment.

As there will be other interstellar flotsam to watch out for. Hopefully, with continuing advances in the detection technology, allowing earlier detection.

That would make for less-risky missions at lower costs.
Jayarava
not rated yet Nov 26, 2017
Except that we can safely assume that Oumuamua is not the only extra-solarsystem object to pass through. There are probably several each year. The thing to do would be to build a suitable craft in space, and target a subsequent candidate that is not already heading away from us faster than the fastest space-craft ever made (that we are supposed to *overtake* after 5-10 years).

And why are they talking about "Jupiter flybys" and "beyond pluto" - the object is moving roughly perpendicular to the ecliptic, i.e. Jupiter is in the wrong direction! It would take *years* just to get to Jupiter.

How does this back-of-an-envelop stuff ever get published in a journal?
TheGhostofOtto1923
5 / 5 (2) Nov 26, 2017
Another option may be developing a power source sufficient to make VASIMR feasible. VASIMR people claim a trip to mars in 39 days if only they had a light enough 200mw nuclear reactor or equivalent.
https://www.googl...jcWPIm0R

- The development of such a power source would offer the greatest benefit by far to humanity, and open the entire solar system to exploration.

As far as waiting for future tech, why not launch a mission now and one later if and when the tech becomes available?

There is a slim but compelling possibility that this object is artificial.
TheGhostofOtto1923
5 / 5 (2) Nov 26, 2017
How does this back-of-an-envelop stuff ever get published in a journal?
Instead of criticizing scientists who obviously know far more than you, why not do some research and find out what you are missing?

After all, you form your opinions from a few minutes reading a pr release while they spend months looking at a problem and years getting the education to do so. Doesnt that tell you something?

It would help you to avoid looking like an ass, if that's at all important to you.
Moebius
4 / 5 (1) Nov 26, 2017
Ancient astronaut theorists ask "What if it isn't an asteroid, what if it's a dead space ship? What if it was supposed to colonize our system but the retros failed? What if it's carrying space vampires? WHAT IF?"
rrwillsj
1 / 5 (1) Nov 26, 2017
J, my reading of this article is proposing a flight plan (using existing or soon to be tested technology) to send a recon drone on a fly-by of Jupiter. There picking up delta/v with a gravity assist to steer out of the System plane. Aiming for a rendezvous.

J, two sayings for your edification:

"Use it up. Make it do. Or do without!"

"Patience, patience, catches the monkey."

Envision orbits as shells, their meaning was to catch up with the rock about the same distance as the Pluto shell.

If you want faster transit? Invent it! Develop, build, test, rebuild. Resources (including funding and skilled people) for astronautical efforts is limited. Which programs get deprived to benefit you?

How does stuff like this, hypothesized imaginings, random proposals, wild speculations, get published on this site? For that matter on any of a million Internet sites? When the advertisers are happy, the employees of the site get paid more.
rrwillsj
1 / 5 (1) Nov 26, 2017
TGO1, I agree with you we should go with what machinery is available for the proposed chase mission, right now.

There are a lot of proposed designs for space travel. Some of them may eventually work out. Or, turn out to be such spectacular failures that we can agree to try something else.

However, I lack any enthusiasm for an prototype nuclear reactor flying over my head.

And, no, no, I do not see any compelling evidence that this asteroid core is anything but a metallic rock.
rrwillsj
1 / 5 (1) Nov 26, 2017
M, what can I say but you are paddling in the shallow end of the gene pool when you repeat the babble of the antiquated astronuts.

All those corybantics have ever proven is that evolution has been wasted on primates. That the human race is still a pack of destructive howling monkeys.

It was bad enough that this rock is vaguely cylindrical in shape. Sooner or later the odds are, we're going to see a vaguely pyramid shape asteroid. And all you 'True Believers' will go apeshit crazy.

Hilarity will abound, I'm sure.

Though I have always said, truly intelligent aliens would stay the hell away from this planet. Especially once they can pick-up our commercial television and radio signals.

That could explain why the Ramadamadingdong cylinder is running silent. Holding their breaths, hoping to make a clean get away. Before the Planet of the Crazy Apes catches them and drags them off for vivisection.

TheGhostofOtto1923
5 / 5 (1) Nov 26, 2017
I lack any enthusiasm for an prototype nuclear reactor flying over my head
But Willis they're already there.
https://youtu.be/Qw9oX-kZ_9k

-Sorry wrong link...

"As of 2010, more than 30 small fission power system nuclear reactors have been sent into space in the Soviet RORSAT satellites, with only one—SNAP-10A—by the US. In addition, over 40 radioisotope thermoelectric generators have been used globally (principally US and USSR) on space missions."

-Not to mention all those bombers that used to carry nukes

"dual-capable bombers do not fly airborne alert with nuclear weapons today, although they did so routinely during the [Cold War] (and are capable of doing so again if the decision should ever be made to resume this practice)."

-which you didn't know about. And also not to mention

"U.S. govt has an entire fleet of highly specialized trucks it uses to transport nuclear material like weapons around the country."

-driving by your house at this very moment.
TheGhostofOtto1923
5 / 5 (1) Nov 26, 2017
All those corybantics have ever proven is that evolution has been wasted on primates. That the human race is still a pack of destructive howling monkeys
Yeah and I can't think of anything much more foul than gratuitous misanthropy.

Don't you know you're only revealing self-loathing? Poor baby.
ab6pn
not rated yet Nov 26, 2017
So how long does it take to get a space mission from inception to reality? Right. So forget about it.
rrwillsj
not rated yet Nov 27, 2017
TGO1, thanks for FYI about what is flying overhead and on our highways. Don't forget the railroads hauling wastes, the barges and supply ships to the Navy. Plenty of opportunity for an accident in all our neighborhoods.

I am still mot enthused about any of this glowing shit!

Don;t think I'm expressing self-hatred when I viciously satirize the antiquated astronult cults. Yes, they are pathetically stupid and it is cruel to make fun of them. I guess I lack the strength of character to pity their stuporstitions.

But I will accept the title of misanthrope. As an elder anthropoid, who better to point out their foibles?

A6p, you are correct in your critique of the time it takes to get space missions off the ground. That is why I suggested using whatever is already available and accept the risks of rushing the job.

However, I doubt if there is sufficient political support to re-prioritize planned missions, funding or other resources to chase the flying fire-extinguisher.
Osiris1
not rated yet Nov 28, 2017
enuf of the 'gravity assists'! Let us develope nuclear or fusion propulsion and just drive whrre we want to.
rrwillsj
not rated yet Nov 29, 2017
O1, we all await with baited breath for you to hook us with your brilliant inventions of new propulsion systems. And see you invest your fortune in getting those ships built and launched.

Until you oblige us with the physical products of your genius? I guess all us dullards are stuck using obsolete chemical rockets.

Curse our dumbness! At failing to recognize that Osiris can put it all together for us.

Oh, wait... That was Isis.

Never mind.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.