Study casts doubt on warming implications of brown carbon aerosol from wildfires

Study casts doubt on warming implications of brown carbon aerosol from wildfires
A team of engineers at Washington University in St. Louis makes a new discovery about one type of wildfire residue and its effect on the atmosphere. Credit: Washington University in St. Louis

As devastating wildfires continue to rage in the western U.S. and Canada, a team of environmental engineers at Washington University in St. Louis have discovered that light-absorbing organic particulate matter, also known as brown carbon aerosol, in wildfire smoke loses its ability to absorb sunlight the longer it remains in the atmosphere.

Rajan Chakrabarty, assistant professor, and Brent Williams, the Raymond R. Tucker Distinguished InCEES Career Development Associate Professor, both aerosol scientists in the Department of Energy, Environmental & Chemical Engineering in the School of Engineering & Applied Science, and their labs found that brown carbon aerosol changes its properties from light-absorbing to light-scattering the longer it remains in the . When it is first emitted, the smoke is brown and has a effect on the atmosphere. But over several days in the atmosphere, the smoke gradually turns white and has a significantly reduced warming effect. The resulting white smoke roughly contributes to roughly a 46 percent reduction in light absorption compared with the brown smoke.

"Our study casts doubts on the warming implications of brown carbon," Chakrabarty said. "If this life cycle analysis is not taken into account, could very well give rise to overestimated values of warming due to these aerosols."

Results of the research were published in early online publication in Environmental Science & Technology Letters Sept. 21.

While scientists already identified black carbon, or soot, as the major light-absorbing and warming agent, less is known about the effects of brown carbon from smoldering wildfires on the atmosphere. There are a lot of uncertainties regarding the role of these aerosols in enhancing atmospheric warming, the researchers said.

Chakrabarty, Williams and their lab members made the discovery by burning peatland fuels, acquired from different regions of Alaska with the help of the U.S. Forest Service, in their combustion chamber. Smoldering peat fires in the Boreal forests are a major source of organic aerosol and carbon emissions. In a unique simulated environment, the team studied the changes in the physics, chemistry, optical properties and composition of the smoke over several days. By exposing the smoke plumes to ultraviolet radiation and oxidants, such as ozone, in a photochemical reactor, they could mimic the natural effects in the atmosphere.

When the smoke was first emitted from the burns, it was a muddy brown from the way it absorbed the shorter visible wavelengths (blue to green).

"We saw that as the smoke ages in our simulated atmosphere, we are increasing the extent to which the chemical changes can happen," said Williams, director of the Washington University Climate Change Program (WUCCP). "As this chemistry occurs in the atmosphere, the smoke particles become a lighter color as the days go on. If the particles always stayed brown, they would continue to contribute to warming because they absorb more radiation. If after a few days in the atmosphere they turn white, they'll start contributing to cooling by scattering more radiation."

Chakrabarty said the results will be beneficial to scientists for fine-tuning climate models and satellite retrieval algorithms. It also will assist several federal agencies working to understand wildfires.

"Wildfires are going to be the major source of air pollution because of decades of fire suppression and increased fuel loads," Chakrabarty said. "We have exerted control to a certain extent on regular emissions, such as those from vehicles and industries, but this is nature, and it's very hard to control."

Williams said the longtime land management in the West and warming in the northern part of the country has led to an increase of combustible fuels as climate change has become more prevalent.

"Events such as droughts, floods and invasive pests can all kill your vegetation, so you have standing, dead vegetation with a whole forest floor full of fuel ready to go," Williams said. "All of our models predict that these fires are going to get more extreme. In addition to the climate implications that were a focus of this study, air quality management districts are also very concerned about the health consequences for communities that will have poorer air quality because of these forest fires."


Explore further

Peat fire emissions may shed light on climate change

More information: Benjamin J. Sumlin et al, Atmospheric Photooxidation Diminishes Light Absorption by Primary Brown Carbon Aerosol from Biomass Burning, Environmental Science & Technology Letters (2017). DOI: 10.1021/acs.estlett.7b00393
Citation: Study casts doubt on warming implications of brown carbon aerosol from wildfires (2017, October 11) retrieved 17 June 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2017-10-implications-brown-carbon-aerosol-wildfires.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
4 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more