Americans' views towards refugee resettlement: Not-in-my backyard (NIMBYism) and media frames

September 6, 2017, Dartmouth College
Credit: CC0 Public Domain

A Dartmouth study finds that Americans are consistently less supportive of refugee resettlement within their own communities than nationally, illustrating the prevalence of not-in-my-backyard syndrome (NIMBYism). The manner in which the media links refugee issues to national security concerns was also found to affect public support for resettlement. The findings are published in Science Advances.

"This study demonstrates the collective action problems countries face when seeking to increase the scale of resettlement programs. While these policies are national in scope, their impact is primarily local. Yet citizens who ostensibly support these humanitarian policies appear to be less comfortable with the possibility of hosting refugees within their own communities," says Jeremy Ferwerda, an assistant professor of government at Dartmouth, who served as one of the co-authors of the study.

Following President Donald Trump's January 2017 executive order barring U.S. entry for citizens from seven Muslim-majority countries, Dartmouth researchers conducted a survey experiment to investigate how people's attitudes towards refugee resettlement are influenced by the geographic location of resettlement and framing of refugees. In the experiment, participants were presented with one of two media frames: one frame depicted refugees as threatening to national security and the other attempted to rebut the security threat argument. Participants were then asked questions about their support for local and national refugee resettlement.

Regardless of age, gender, race, income, education, employment status, ideology, or partisanship, participants were less supportive of refugee resettlement in their own community compared to national resettlement. This finding suggests that NIMBYism is widespread across citizens with diverse demographic and political backgrounds.

Participants were also significantly less likely to support refugee resettlement after reading the threatening media frame. Counterarguments rebutting the argument that refugees posed a threat did not appear to sway minds. These media framing results are consistent with prior research, which finds that negative framing of immigrants are more consequential for public opinion than positive frames.

However, the study also finds that people's reactions to negative media frames vary depending on local refugee population, which may serve as a proxy for prior contact with refugees. Specifically, participants living near large refugee populations were less responsive to threatening media frames compared to those living in areas with smaller or no refugee populations. This suggests that proximity to refugees may help mitigate the influence of threatening media frames.

Given that the January executive order instructs the government to consider a system in which localities may opt out of refugee resettlement, the findings provide insight into the challenges that could lie ahead for placing refugees in communities throughout the country.

Explore further: Economic benefits of admitting refugees outweigh costs

More information: J. Ferwerda el al., "Explaining opposition to refugee resettlement: The role of NIMBYism and perceived threats," Science Advances (2017). http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/3/9/e1700812 , DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1700812

Related Stories

Economic benefits of admitting refugees outweigh costs

June 15, 2017

Although working-age adult refugees who enter the United States often initially rely on public assistance programs, a study by researchers at the University of Notre Dame indicates that the long-term economic benefit of admitting ...

The fiscal impact of refugees in Sweden

December 16, 2015

The world currently has more refugees and internally displaced persons than it has had since World War II. Since late summer 2015 massive numbers of refugees from countries like Syria, Iraq, and Afghanistan have streamed ...

Refugees can offer economic boost to their host countries

June 20, 2016

Refugees are often considered an economic burden for the countries that take them in, but a new study conducted by UC Davis with the United Nations World Food Program indicates that refugees receiving aid—especially in ...

Special efforts are needed to address trauma in refugee youth

June 15, 2017

In a study of children and adolescents referred for mental health services at US trauma treatment sites, there were important differences in the experiences of refugee youth who were displaced by war-related violence relative ...

Recommended for you

3 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

rrrander
1 / 5 (1) Sep 06, 2017
I like the liberal elite. Foisting refugees on the poorest communities and never, ever living within five MILES of these people they claim to love so much.
Da Schneib
5 / 5 (2) Sep 06, 2017
NIMBYs are everywhere and tank all sorts of positive programs that actually won't cause them any trouble.

Get over it.
Gigel
not rated yet Sep 07, 2017
What refugees is this about? Cuban refugees? Those from South America (if any) or South-East Asia? I think the article is skipping over some significant information.

Some current refugee fluxes have some serious security problems attached, which can be seen occasionally in the news. I don't mean it's the refugees who have said problems, but along them come people who pose such problems. I'd like to help muslim refugees, who are humans after all, but I don't want terrorists around me. That's the issue, not refugees, but terrorists. Btw, I'm from Europe.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.