Making lab equipment on the cheap

Making lab equipment on the cheap
A 3-D model of FlyPi (left) and the assembled FlyPi with single micromanipulator and light-emitting diode-ring module, diffusor, and Petri dish adapter mounted in the bottom (right). Credit: Tom Baden

Laboratory equipment is one of the largest cost factors in neuroscience. However, many experiments can be performed with good results using self-assembled setups involving 3-D printed components and self-programmed electronics. In a study publishing July 18 in the open access journal PLOS Biology, André Maia Chagas and Tom Baden from the Universities of Tübingen and Sussex present "FlyPi"—a low-cost imaging and microscope system for research, training and teaching.

The intricate equipment necessary for modern neuroscience experiments can easily cost tens or even hundreds of thousands of Euros when relying on commercially available solutions, confining top-level research and scientific training to well-endowed institutes in rich countries.

"FlyPi" can perform many standard lab protocols, including light and fluorescence microscopy, optogenetics, thermogenetics, and behavioural studies on small animals such as roundworms, fruit flies, zebrafish larvae. The design is based on a 3-D printed framework holding a Raspberry Pi computer and camera, cheap LEDs for lighting and simple lenses, as well as optical and thermal control circuits based on Arduino, an open-source microcontroller. Taken together, the components cost less than 100 Euros for the basic system, and can be modified to suit the lab's purposes. The FlyPi system provides modular, low-cost options for research and assembly, and instructions for use are made available free of charge via open-source platforms.

The developers of the FlyPi system share a keen interest in spreading "open labware." Together with co-author Lucia Prieto Godino of the University of Lausanne, the developers have taught courses in 3 D printing, programming and DIY at universities in Kenya, Uganda, Ghana, Nigeria, South Africa, Sudan and Tanzania. "Many institutions around the world have little money to spend on costly equipment," says Baden. "We think it is very important that neuroscientific training and research open up to larger numbers of students and junior scientists. So we hope that, with open labware such as our FlyPi, we can offer a starting point."


Explore further

Researcher slashes optics laboratory costs using customizable 3-D printable designs

More information: Maia Chagas A, Prieto-Godino LL, Arrenberg AB, Baden T (2017) The €100 lab: A 3D-printable open-source platform for fluorescence microscopy, optogenetics, and accurate temperature control during behaviour of zebrafish, Drosophila, and Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS Biol 15(7): e2002702. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2002702
Journal information: PLoS Biology

Citation: Making lab equipment on the cheap (2017, July 18) retrieved 18 April 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2017-07-lab-equipment-cheap.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
343 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Jul 18, 2017
I assume the biggest issue with making your own lab equipment is ensuring it's properly calibrated.

Jul 18, 2017
This comment has been removed by a moderator.

Jul 19, 2017
The article states that it is geared towards students and junior scientists.

Dr. Baden says, "We think it is very important that neuroscientific training and research open up to larger numbers of students and junior scientists. So we hope that, with open labware such as our FlyPi, we can offer a starting point."


Jul 19, 2017
"There is also the question, whether we are paying the scientists for doing research or for doing equipment."

Now Db, you know the truly important question at all Institutions of Higher Learning is: "Are we paying our Sports Coaches (male of course) enough to build a winning team?"

Jul 20, 2017
This comment has been removed by a moderator.

Jul 20, 2017
This comment has been removed by a moderator.

Jul 20, 2017
I assume the biggest issue with making your own lab equipment is ensuring it's properly calibrated.

Since calibration can often be compensated with software that's not as much an issue as one might think.
Even so: for learning purposeses a device that gives qualitative insights is usually enough. It is not expected of students to make world-class accuracy measurements in a lab designed to teach them the fundamentals. If you can get some quantitative data out of it, great...but for the envisioned use cases it's not essential.

Jul 21, 2017
Sorry Db, but if you need to consider, hell we all need to consider. How much tax money and public property and siphoning funds from educational endowments (yeah, for tax breaks!) are diverted to pay for everything from stadiums to security to traffic access and parking, to medical including insurance and a hundred other forms of fake-amateur sports being used to corrupt education and our society.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more