Good fighters are bad runners

July 21, 2017
Credit: martha sexton/public domain

For mice and men, a strength in one area of Darwinian fitness may mean a deficiency in another. A look at Olympic athletes shows that a wrestler is built much differently than a marathoner. It's long been supposed that strength in fighting, or protecting territory and resources, comes at the expense of running, or spatial mobility. Now an experiment with house mice provides evidence for this theory. 

University of Utah researchers measured how successful mice in the lab were at fending off other males from a territory containing females. The mice were housed in a lab enclosure with plenty of room for the losers of fights to retreat. Before and after the enclosure experiments, the researchers also measured running efficiency of the on tiny treadmills to see which were the most efficient runners. 

Their findings: Mice that defended their territory (i.e. fought off other males) burned more oxygen while running than less-successful fighters. You might be picturing Charles Atlas huffing and puffing while running while a lean 97-lb weakling runs circles around him effortlessly, but that wasn't the case in this experiment - good fighters and good runners had about the same body mass. More subtle physiological differences between the two groups are likely at work. 

Humans are also creatures that employ both endurance-based and aggression-based behaviors, so the results give a clue as to how the trade-offs may have shaped our evolution.

The paper is recently published in the Journal of Experimental Biology,.

Explore further: Even your bones can get fat, mouse study suggests

More information: Jeremy S. Morris et al, A disparity between locomotor economy and territory-holding ability in male house mice, The Journal of Experimental Biology (2017). DOI: 10.1242/jeb.154823

Related Stories

Heavy runners risk injury in lightweight running shoes

June 21, 2017

Minimalist or lightweight running shoes, popularised as a safe alternative to conventional trainers, have been found to cause more harm than good for runners carrying extra weight, reveals research from the University of ...

Recommended for you

Scientists edit butterfly wing spots and stripes

September 18, 2017

An international research team working at the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute in Panama knocked-out a single control gene in the DNA of seven different butterfly species. In the Sept. 18 Proceedings of the National ...

Enzyme's worth to biofuels shown in latest research

September 18, 2017

An enzyme discovered at the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) proves adept at breaking down cellulose fibers regardless of whether their crystalline structure is simple or highly ...

When it comes to the threat of extinction, size matters

September 18, 2017

Animals in the Goldilocks zone—neither too big, nor too small, but just the right size—face a lower risk of extinction than do those on both ends of the scale, according to an extensive global analysis.

Deep roots in plants driven by soil hydrology

September 18, 2017

Searching for water, some tree roots probe hundreds of feet deep and many trees send roots through cracks in rocks, according to a new study led by a Rutgers University-New Brunswick professor.

3 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Yellowdart
not rated yet Jul 21, 2017
I guess they never heard of Lawrence Taylor...
Dingbone
Jul 21, 2017
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
TheGhostofOtto1923
not rated yet Jul 21, 2017
Fight or flee...

"Humans are also creatures that employ both endurance-based and aggression-based behaviors, so the results give a clue as to how the trade-offs may have shaped our evolution."

Humans developed the ambush, a tactic wildly successful in both hunting and fighting which are in essence the same thing. Superior runners were able to outflank the competition and lie in wait. An ambush throws the advantage to brains over brawn. An essential component is the ability to anticipate an opponents movements.

Goodall described apes ambushing enemies. But with humans the art of the ambush, as well as escape and evasion, escalated rapidly, requiring bigger brains and greater mobility, ultimately culminating in the cavalry.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.