Who will suffer the most from US climate exit?

June 2, 2017 by Mariëtte Le Roux
Experts are concerned that the US decision to withdraw from the Paris Agreement on climate change could prompt other major carbon-emitting nations to follow suit

In withdrawing the United States from the Paris climate pact, President Donald Trump claimed that honouring its terms would cost the country billions of dollars for a miniscule change to the global warming trajectory.

Is this true? How will Washington quitting the 196-nation Paris club affect the fight against change?


The Paris Agreement's stated goal is to limit the average global temperature to two degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) over its level prior to the Industrial Revolution, wich kicked off large-scale coal and oil burning to fuel human progress.

Trump proclaimed that if nations honoured their pledges for curbing planet-warming in full, it would produce a mere 0.2 C Celsius "reduction" in global temperature by the year 2100.

Not so, experts say.

Scientific projections show that the Paris pledges place Earth on course for warming of 3 C, which is why they need to be significantly upgraded in the years to come.

America's withdrawal from the climate club risks adding another 0.3 C, according to Deon Terblance of the World Meteorological Organization's department for atmospheric research.

This early estimate was based on the assumption that no American city, region or company compensates for the federal shortfall in emissions cuts, which is unlikely as many have challenged the wisdom of Trump's decision and pledged to stay the clean energy course.

Countries will meet next year to review the overall impact of their efforts to limit global temperature rises to 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels

Countries will meet next year for the first time since the pact was signed to review the overall impact of their efforts on the 2 C target. The first loose deadline for updating emissions pledges is 2020, and every five years thereafter.


Trump claimed the Green Climate Fund (GCF) would "likely obligate the United States to commit potentially tens of billions of dollars".

The fund was set up to help developing countries and those at high risk of global warming-induced disasters to move away from fossil fuel and shore up their defences against climate impacts.

In reality, observers point out, the US under Barack Obama had committed $3 billion to the fund, now $10 billion strong, and paid one billion. Trump will withhold the other two billion.

The GCF is only one avenue of international climate funding, a contentious issue on which poor countries had sought assurances before they signed up to the Paris Agreement.

"The question of finance will be very difficult to solve," said Laurent Fabius, who presided over the UN conference that adopted the pact. "The money will have to be found elsewhere."

The United States further contributed about a quarter of the budget of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) under whose auspices the Paris Agreement was negotiated. The US contribution was about $4 million last year, a quarter of the total, which will now fall away.

But on Friday, the charitable foundation Bloomberg Philanthropies pledged to contribute $15 million to the UNFCCC secretariat.

America's withdrawal from the Paris Agreement on climate change could add 0.3 degrees Celsius to global temperatures by the end of the century
"Americans are not walking away from the Paris Climate Agreement," said Mike Bloomberg, the UN secretary general's special envoy for cities and .

"Americans will honour and fulfil the Paris Agreement by leading from the bottom up -– and there isn't anything Washington can do to stop us."

Domino effect?

Some fear a US withdrawal may spur other recalcitrant carbon polluters to follow suit, or at least dampen enthusiasm for updating emissions-cutting pledges.

Scientists say that to meet the 2 C target, humanity must leave a third of all oil reserves, half of gas reserves and over 80 percent of coal reserves in the ground.

The UN's climate science panel recommends a 40-70-percent emissions cut by 2050 from 2010 levels, whereas the Paris Agreement itself commits signatories to peaking emissions "as soon as possible".

"In the short term the United States' withdrawal from the Paris Agreement will certainly have ripple effects globally," said Bill Hare, chief executive of the Climate Analytics think tank.

"But rather than fatally undermine the Paris Agreement, it will likely cause other countries to reaffirm their firm commitment to the full implementation of the climate deal."

This is the hope, at least.

Europe, China and India have already recommitted to the deal, though Russia's Vladimir Putin said Friday he would not "judge" Trump for his decision.

Explore further: Billionaire Bloomberg pledges $15 million to UN for climate change

Related Stories

UN climate talks begin amid uncertainty over US position

May 8, 2017

Despite uncertainties about whether the United States will remain committed to the Paris climate accord under President Donald Trump, envoys convened talks Monday in Germany on implementing the details of the deal to combat ...

Recommended for you

Earth's deep mantle flows dynamically

March 25, 2019

As ancient ocean floors plunge over 1,000 km into the Earth's deep interior, they cause hot rock in the lower mantle to flow much more dynamically than previously thought, finds a new UCL-led study.

Scientists solve mystery shrouding oldest animal fossils

March 25, 2019

Scientists from The Australian National University (ANU) have discovered that 558 million-year-old Dickinsonia fossils do not reveal all of the features of the earliest known animals, which potentially had mouths and guts.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

2.3 / 5 (6) Jun 02, 2017
"Who will suffer the most from US climate exit?"

........only the paychecks of EU & UN Climatologists who had been depending on the US Taxpayer overpaying their "fair share" just like we presently do in NATO.

1 / 5 (3) Jun 02, 2017
Everyone but the United States :-)
not rated yet Jun 03, 2017
Who will suffer most? Well, pretty much all US citizens travelling abroad right now (business and pleasure), are being asked about this, all day long. Everywhere they go. Everyone they talk to for longer than one minute will bring this subject up (actually probing 'are you a retard too?').

How it penetrates daily life in the future will be of other magnitude than annoyance, but less smeared out; some won't notice, others however..; there will be lifeless statistics of more casualties of droughts, tornados, floods, fires etc. The direct cause-effect link of policy to the specific family losing their child and their home in that specific tornado will never be proven. The emergent properties of policy; these specific families, that is where you will find those who will 'suffer most', not with 'the tax payers'. In effect stepping out of 'Paris' is like pushing the red button. He has already done it.
1 / 5 (2) Jun 04, 2017
Silly. The Paris Agreement accomplishes nothing tangible beyond perpetuating future international climate conferences where delegates can worry together about a problem that exists only in their imaginations, negotiate non-binding agreements to "do something" about it, and congratulate themselves for their sweat and tears over a naturally occurring phenomenon that has been happening for millions of years.

Going to Paris to rally the faithful to worry about climate change: $$$$
Witnessing their mass derangement after Trump's rejection of their nonsense: priceless

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.