Narcissistic CEOs at American banks took great risks, study shows

Banks that were led by a more narcissistic – that is, highly self-loving and self-appraising – CEO before the collapse of the US banking industry in September 2008 suffered more severe consequences of that systemic shock. That is one of the main conclusions by Tine Buyl and colleagues based on a recent study published in the Journal of Management.

The authors used a sample of 92 CEOs of US commercial from 2006 to 2014 to investigate how narcissistic the CEOs were and how this character trait impacted organizational risk-taking behavior. The researchers also investigated how this affected the resilience of these banks to the 2008 shock in the and their capacity for recovery.

High-risk derivatives

Before the shock, banks with narcissistic CEOs invested more in high-risk derivatives and off-balance sheet items (including mortgage-backed securities). The effect of CEO narcissism became even stronger when it coincided with compensation policies that encouraged risk-taking (stock options). The effect was cushioned if a board containing experienced and independent directors, and thus more effective monitoring, was in place.

High-risk narcissistic behavior combined with poor corporate governance proved to be a dangerous mix. Banks became vulnerable and, as a result of the depletion of resources and internal buffers, it took longer for them to recover to their pre-shock performance levels.

Capital injections

High-risk investment does not need to be a problem in favorable economic circumstances or if a bank can relatively easily attract new capital. However, the squeeze in the capital market after September 2008 made matters rather complicated.

Capital injections by the US government as part of the Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP) allowed the banks to partly or entirely replenish their depleted resources and mitigated the adverse effects on the banks' resilience and capacity to recover. Although TARP's objective had been to rescue the crippled financial sector, TARP in fact financed the excessive, high-risk strategies by narcissistic CEOs.


Explore further

Bailed-out banks issued riskier loans

More information: CEO Narcissism, Risk-taking, and Resilience: An Empirical Analysis in U.S. Commercial Banks, Journal of Management. (forthcoming 2017).
Journal information: Journal of Management

Provided by Tilburg University
Citation: Narcissistic CEOs at American banks took great risks, study shows (2017, May 3) retrieved 23 April 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2017-05-narcissistic-ceos-american-banks-great.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
13 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

May 03, 2017
Being in charge (power) has an undue attraction for those in the narcissism/sociopathy/psychopathy spectrum. Society would be well served if boards of directors made more effort to filter out these emotionally flawed individuals.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more