Why and how businesses should protect against data breaches from within

April 24, 2017 by Craig Horne, The Conversation
Data breaches are on the rise and insiders are a big part of it. Credit: Shutterstock

As we become more connected and companies hold more data, breaches are increasing, with more than 4,000 reported in 2016 alone. A statistical analysis of breaches in the United States found that 85% were conducted by someone known to the business, usually an employee or partner.

To protect both themselves and their customers, companies need to secure their data. This starts with critically evaluating what they hold, and then securing, dumping and outsourcing it as necessary.

We can never be entirely protected from , but understanding data is the first step to minimising the risk.

Data breaches can take a number of forms

Recently, Australian startup ShowPo alleged a former employee had exported a customer database before going to work for a competitor.

A DuPont employee was charged just this month with stealing 20,000 files – including trade secrets – with the aim of selling them to rival companies in Taiwan.

Employees at Wells Fargo Bank leaked , allowing criminals to impersonate customers and steal more than half a million dollars. Around US$16 billion was stolen, affecting more than 12 million consumers in the US in 2014 alone due to identity theft.

What makes these breaches worse is that once information has been stolen it cannot be easily recovered. If a thief steals a wallet, it can be returned. But this is not true for information theft because the owner still has it. Data can be replicated almost infinitely. The genie can't be put back in the bottle.

This only gets worse as technology improves, allowing for greater storage, concealment and transmission of data.

What data needs to be secured?

The first step in securing data is to do an audit. What data does the organisation hold and where is it stored? Which suppliers, customers, regulators or staff have access to it? This is important as data comes in many forms, and ownership can be quite murky.

For example, does a business own the emails downloaded onto a workers' smartphone?

Next, the type of data needs to be profiled and classified as public, confidential or secret. Not all data is created equal and some may not require confidentiality, such as sales brochures.

Customer data, on the other hand, would be classified as confidential. Especially due to tough penalties in recently passed legislation. These include fines of A$360,000 for individuals and A$1.8 million for organisations, for those that don't divulge breaches of .

So companies need to identify what is high-value or strategically important information.

The next step is to decide whether any outsourcing constraints exist and are relevant to the organisation. For example, do privacy obligations prevent organisations from storing personal information in outside of Australia?

Three strategies

Once the data has been sorted, there are three strategic approaches to reduce the danger of data breaches.

The first strategy involves securing sensitive information with protective fortifications. This could take the form of encrypting it.

But there are some weaknesses to this approach. Encrypted information may make workflows cumbersome, and it may not stop an insider who has been trusted with passwords. It could also lead to a false sense of security.

The second strategy involves devaluing the data held by actively deciding not to hold . This is analogous to a retail shop hanging a "no cash kept on premises" sign in the window.

Does a company really need to hold , for instance, or could that be outsourced to a company like Paypal? Businesses may always need to protect their "secret sauce", but by methodically devaluing data they are less of a target and can concentrate on what to protect.

The third strategy involves seeking outside assistance. This may not be an option for some sectors due to regulation, but storing data in the cloud or hiring a security service provider may be wise if possible. These services often offer security infrastructure unavailable to small organisations, as well as specialists to counter a lack of security expertise inside an organisation.

But, again, there is a trade-off. Outsourcing comes with a lack of control, which may increase other risks. The Australian Red Cross found this out when an external administrator accidentally leaked the of blood donors.

In the end, we can never be entirely safe. But if businesses critically analyse what data they hold, and adopt strategies in response to this, the risk of an insider attack can be minimised.

Explore further: New law will force some (but not all) organisations to reveal data breaches

Related Stories

Q&A: Ashley Madison hack only latest high-profile breach

August 20, 2015

The data breach affecting customers of the Ashley Madison website may be salacious, embarrassing or even ruinous for those involved. But it's only the latest, and not the biggest, high-profile breach of customer or employee ...

2.5 million Californians exposed in data breaches

July 3, 2013

A state report reveals 2.5 million Californians have had Social Security numbers, credit card and bank accounts and other sensitive information exposed in 131 data breaches since 2010.

Recommended for you

Pushing lithium ion batteries to the next performance level

December 13, 2018

Conventional lithium ion batteries, such as those widely used in smartphones and notebooks, have reached performance limits. Materials chemist Freddy Kleitz from the Faculty of Chemistry of the University of Vienna and international ...

Uber filed paperwork for IPO: report

December 8, 2018

Ride-share company Uber quietly filed paperwork this week for its initial public offering, the Wall Street Journal reported late Friday.


Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.