Gravitational wave kicks monster black hole out of galactic core

March 23, 2017
The galaxy 3C186, located about 8 billion light years from Earth, is most likely the result of a merger of two galaxies. This is supported by arc-shaped tidal tails, usually produced by a gravitational tug between two colliding galaxies, identified by the scientists. The merger of the galaxies also led to a merger of the two supermassive black holes in their centers, and the resultant black hole was then kicked out of its parent galaxy by the gravitational waves created by the merger. Credit: NASA, ESA, and M. Chiaberge (STScI/ESA)

Astronomers have uncovered a supermassive black hole that has been propelled out of the center of a distant galaxy by what could be the awesome power of gravitational waves.

Though there have been several other suspected, similarly booted black holes elsewhere, none has been confirmed so far. Astronomers think this object, detected by NASA's Hubble Space Telescope, is a very strong case. Weighing more than 1 billion suns, the rogue black hole is the most massive black hole ever detected to have been kicked out of its central home.

Researchers estimate that it took the equivalent energy of 100 million supernovas exploding simultaneously to jettison the black hole. The most plausible explanation for this propulsive energy is that the monster object was given a kick by gravitational waves unleashed by the merger of two hefty black holes at the center of the host galaxy.

First predicted by Albert Einstein, gravitational waves are ripples in space that are created when two massive objects collide. The ripples are similar to the concentric circles produced when a hefty rock is thrown into a pond. Last year, the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO) helped astronomers prove that gravitational waves exist by detecting them emanating from the union of two stellar-mass black holes, which are several times more massive than the sun.

Hubble's observations of the wayward black hole surprised the research team. "When I first saw this, I thought we were seeing something very peculiar," said team leader Marco Chiaberge of the Space Telescope Science Institute (STScI) and Johns Hopkins University, in Baltimore, Maryland. "When we combined observations from Hubble, the Chandra X-ray Observatory, and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, it all pointed towards the same scenario. The amount of data we collected, from X-rays to ultraviolet to near-infrared light, is definitely larger than for any of the other candidate rogue black holes."

Chiaberge's paper will appear in the March 30 issue of Astronomy & Astrophysics.

Hubble images taken in visible and near-infrared light provided the first clue that the galaxy was unusual. The images revealed a bright quasar, the energetic signature of a black hole, residing far from the galactic core. Black holes cannot be observed directly, but they are the energy source at the heart of quasars - intense, compact gushers of radiation that can outshine an entire galaxy. The quasar, named 3C 186, and its host galaxy reside 8 billion light-years away in a galaxy cluster. The team discovered the galaxy's peculiar features while conducting a Hubble survey of distant galaxies unleashing powerful blasts of radiation in the throes of galaxy mergers.

"I was anticipating seeing a lot of merging galaxies, and I was expecting to see messy host galaxies around the quasars, but I wasn't really expecting to see a quasar that was clearly offset from the core of a regularly shaped galaxy," Chiaberge recalled. "Black holes reside in the center of galaxies, so it's unusual to see a quasar not in the center."

This illustration shows how gravitational waves can propel a black hole from the center of a galaxy. The scenario begins in the first panel with the merger of two galaxies, each with a central black hole. In the second panel, the two black holes in the newly merged galaxy settle into the center and begin whirling around each other. This energetic action produces gravitational waves. As the two hefty objects continue to radiate away gravitational energy, they move closer to each other over time, as seen in the third panel. If the black holes do not have the same mass and rotation rate, they emit gravitational waves more strongly in one direction, as shown by the bright area at upper left. The black holes finally merge in the fourth panel, forming one giant black hole. The energy emitted by the merger propels the black hole away from the center in the opposite direction of the strongest gravitational waves. Credit: NASA, ESA, and A. Feild (STScI)

The team calculated the black hole's distance from the core by comparing the distribution of starlight in the host galaxy with that of a normal elliptical galaxy from a computer model. The black hole had traveled more than 35,000 light-years from the center, which is more than the distance between the sun and the center of the Milky Way.

Based on spectroscopic observations taken by Hubble and the Sloan survey, the researchers estimated the black hole's mass and measured the speed of gas trapped near the behemoth object. Spectroscopy divides light into its component colors, which can be used to measure velocities in space. "To our surprise, we discovered that the gas around the black hole was flying away from the galaxy's center at 4.7 million miles an hour," said team member Justin Ely of STScI. This measurement is also a gauge of the black hole's velocity, because the gas is gravitationally locked to the monster object.

The astronomers calculated that the black hole is moving so fast it would travel from Earth to the moon in three minutes. That's fast enough for the black hole to escape the galaxy in 20 million years and roam through the universe forever.

The Hubble image revealed an interesting clue that helped explain the black hole's wayward location. The host galaxy has faint arc-shaped features called tidal tails, produced by a gravitational tug between two colliding galaxies. This evidence suggests a possible union between the 3C 186 system and another galaxy, each with central, massive black holes that may have eventually merged.

Based on this visible evidence, along with theoretical work, the researchers developed a scenario to describe how the behemoth black hole could be expelled from its central home. According to their theory, two galaxies merge, and their black holes settle into the center of the newly formed elliptical galaxy. As the black holes whirl around each other, gravity waves are flung out like water from a lawn sprinkler. The hefty objects move closer to each other over time as they radiate away gravitational energy. If the two black holes do not have the same mass and rotation rate, they emit gravitational waves more strongly along one direction. When the two black holes collide, they stop producing gravitational waves. The newly merged black hole then recoils in the opposite direction of the strongest gravitational waves and shoots off like a rocket.

The researchers are lucky to have caught this unique event because not every black-hole merger produces imbalanced gravitational waves that propel a black hole in the opposite direction. "This asymmetry depends on properties such as the mass and the relative orientation of the back holes' rotation axes before the merger," said team member Colin Norman of STScI and Johns Hopkins University. "That's why these objects are so rare."

An alternative explanation for the offset quasar, although unlikely, proposes that the bright object does not reside within the galaxy. Instead, the quasar is located behind the galaxy, but the Hubble image gives the illusion that it is at the same distance as the galaxy. If this were the case, the researchers should have detected a galaxy in the background hosting the quasar.

If the researchers' interpretation is correct, the observations may provide strong evidence that supermassive black holes can actually merge. Astronomers have evidence of black-hole collisions for stellar-mass black holes, but the process regulating supermassive black holes is more complex and not completely understood.

The team hopes to use Hubble again, in combination with the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) and other facilities, to more accurately measure the speed of the black hole and its gas disk, which may yield more insight into the nature of this bizarre object.

Explore further: Hubble gazes into a black hole of puzzling lightness

More information: The puzzling case of the radio-loud QSO 3C 186: a gravitational wave recoiling black hole in a young radio source? Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. 3c186 www.spacetelescope.org/static/ … ic1706/heic1706a.pdf

Related Stories

Hubble gazes into a black hole of puzzling lightness

January 13, 2017

The beautiful spiral galaxy visible in the center of the image is known as RX J1140.1+0307, a galaxy in the Virgo constellation imaged by the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope, and it presents an interesting puzzle. At first ...

Image: Computer simulation of a supermassive black hole

April 7, 2016

This computer-simulated image shows a supermassive black hole at the core of a galaxy. The black region in the center represents the black hole's event horizon, where no light can escape the massive object's gravitational ...

Oxymoronic black hole RGG 118 provides clues to growth

August 12, 2015

Astronomers using NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory and the 6.5-meter Clay Telescope in Chile have identified the smallest supermassive black hole ever detected in the center of a galaxy, as described in our latest press release. ...

Hubble image: The sleeping giant

February 11, 2016

The placid appearance of NGC 4889 can fool the unsuspecting observer. But the elliptical galaxy, pictured in this new image from the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope, harbours a dark secret. At its heart lurks one of the most ...

Hubble sees a supermassive and super-hungry galaxy

January 11, 2016

This NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope image shows the spiral galaxy NGC 4845, located over 65 million light-years away in the constellation of Virgo (The Virgin). The galaxy's orientation clearly reveals the galaxy's striking ...

Recommended for you

Eclipse 2017: Science from the moon's shadow

December 11, 2017

On Dec. 11, 2017, six researchers discussed initial findings based on observations of the Sun and on Earth gathered during the solar eclipse that stretched across North America on Aug. 21, 2017. Ranging from new information ...

Unravelling the mysteries of extragalactic jets

December 11, 2017

University of Leeds researchers have mathematically examined plasma jets from supermassive black holes to determine why certain types of jets disintegrate into huge plumes.

The initial mass function

December 11, 2017

The gas and dust in giant molecular clouds gradually come together under the influence of gravity to form stars. Precisely how this occurs, however, is incompletely understood. The mass of a star, for example, is by far the ...

18 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

gkam
Mar 23, 2017
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
Going
not rated yet Mar 23, 2017
So how long ago did the collision which caused the gravity waves and begun the trajectory of this black hole occur?
cantdrive85
1 / 5 (10) Mar 23, 2017
More wild pseudoscientific conjecture without any basis in scientific reality, but why be surprised as this is the MO of astrophysicists.
Nik_2213
1 / 5 (1) Mar 23, 2017
A billion 'solar masses' ? And, when it gets clear of the merging galaxies' halo, it will become dormant ? How many of those would it take to account for that cluster's 'Dark Matter' ??
Da Schneib
5 / 5 (6) Mar 23, 2017
@Going Well, eight billion years ago, since it's 8 billion light years away. The black hole has moved some 35,000 light years away from the center of its galaxy, which is insignificant compared to the travel time for the light to get here; one might as well just say 8 billion years and let it go at that.

@Nik, As far as "becoming dormant," that will depend on how much matter it has to chew through.

A billion solar masses is considerable, but galaxies (particularly galaxies we can see from 8 billion light years away) are from several times that mass to thousands of times. So it would take more than there are galaxies to account for dark matter.
wduckss
1 / 5 (2) Mar 24, 2017
"The black hole had traveled more than 35,000 light-years from the center, which is more than the distance between the sun and the center of the Milky Way." from Article

Clarifying for the readers.
System Sirius is located 8.6 ly and has no influence on the Earth and the Sun. The authors talking gibberish on the impact of two bodies at a distance of 35,000 ly.

"Gravitational waves - a great discovery or a great scandal (a plagiarism)?"
https://www.acade...agiarism
katesisco
2.3 / 5 (3) Mar 24, 2017
Gravity waves No. Solitons, Yes.
KelDude
5 / 5 (2) Mar 24, 2017
@cantdrive85 you sound staid and boring. Without the "wild ideas" where is the starting point for any scientific theory? That's where you start. From there you modify and refine your theory through observations etc. You may even find that it's crap and toss it out but you must use these as starting points. Your statement sort of says you're a bonehead that can't think out of the box. Start dreaming, you may discover a great new theory all by yourself.
antialias_physorg
5 / 5 (5) Mar 24, 2017
How many of those would it take to account for that cluster's 'Dark Matter' ??

This has been considered, but seems unlikely. It's pretty much the opposite of the WIMP theories (WIMP = weakly interacting massive particles). The theory in question was/is called MACHO (MACHO = massive compact halo object)
gkam
2.7 / 5 (7) Mar 24, 2017
How interesting it would have been to get THAT signal on the gravity wave detectors!
richk
5 / 5 (1) Mar 24, 2017
is/there/a/better/model/of/the/imbalanced/waves/that/would/cause/such/a/trajectory?
gkam
1 / 5 (4) Mar 24, 2017
Okay, math wizards, how many horsepower was required to eject that mass at that velocity?
Benni
1 / 5 (5) Mar 24, 2017
The researchers are lucky to have caught this unique event because not every black-hole merger produces imbalanced gravitational waves that propel a black hole in the opposite direction. "This asymmetry depends on properties such as the mass and the relative orientation of the back holes' rotation axes before the merger,


They should simply say what they mean, that what they are detecting is the frequent changing intensity of the GRAVITY FIELD as the two objects approach one another or put distance between one another and then:

"When the two black holes collide, they stop producing gravitational waves"

If you take literally what the author states in the above sentence from the article, you could at first get the impression on first read that the gravity field ceases to exist from the statement "they stop producing gravitational waves". In actuality the change that has "stop"ed is the change of intensity of the gravity field to a higher level.
jross
not rated yet Mar 27, 2017
If two massive Black Holes are circling a common center and there is a third Black Hole located perpendicular to the plane of the circling Black Holes the third Black Hole will be attracted to the center of the circle and will be traveling at speeds such as 21 million meters per second as it passes through the center and will continue sailing away from the two circling Black Holes at about the same speed of 21 million meters per second. This explanation does not depend on waves, just gravity. Gravity from the two circling Black Holes should slow down the third Black Hole but the gravity from the two Black Holes may or may not be strong enough.to pull the third Black Hole back. John Ross
The_Doctor_07
not rated yet Mar 27, 2017
Dear commenters,

i have two questions regarding this news, and maybe someone more knowledgeable in astrophysics than me can give me some hints.
First: Both black holes collide after some circling, and production of gravity waves stops (because there is no dynamic stress on spacetime anymore?) - but how can the second black hole get then pushed out by a counterforce if it has already merged with the bigger black hole, as stated in the article? When black holes merge, don't they become a big mass without any dividing internal features? How can the second black hole re-emerge from such a situation?
Second question in next comment because of character limitation.
The_Doctor_07
not rated yet Mar 27, 2017
Second: Lets just skip a few million or billion years into the future - the black hole only shines as bright quasar, because it has a accretion disk of material around it, which falls beyond the event horizon, and hence radiation, light, x-rays, yada-yada... But somewhere in the future, the black hole has used up most of the surrounding material - so it will go really black somewhen? How long may that take, do we talk about millions of years, billions, more years than the universe has left?
Is it feasible that there are quite a few supermassive (!) black holes out there, which are just nearly undetectable (except maybe for gravitational lensing)? Are there any hints that such lonely and dark supermassive black holes are more than just unique, single cases?
nikola_milovic_378
Mar 28, 2017
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
CarnSoaks
not rated yet Mar 31, 2017
I thought galaxy mergers must be very common over the lifespan of this Cosmos. Perhaps a merger of 2 GN occur in an orderly fashion, but if a third perchance is involved, even "slightly" after a first, the third BH would be forced into a 3 body oscillation and eventually one of the 3 is ejected. A normal part of the dance of 3 postulated to happen regardless of the bodies involved, atoms, planets, starts, BH's.

great to see one so large in action

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.