Polarizing politics prompts 'louder and more frequent calls for political action'

February 20, 2017 by Molly Callahan
Credit: Northeastern University

In the weeks since President Donald J. Trump's inauguration, grassroots movements of the social and political variety have cropped up en masse across the country. But American history is dotted with protests, boycotts, and political upheaval dating back to the nation's birth in 1776.

So is the recent level of civic and political engagement merely an extension of our country's history or does it represent something more? And what, if anything, can we expect these to achieve?

We asked political science professor John Portz to explain how these protests compare with those from the past, with a particular focus on their potential success and social media's role in sparking mass demonstrations.

On Tuesday, The New York Times reported on a group of New York middle school and high school students who are "showing a level of civic engagement not seen in years." Are the recent marches, protests, and campaigns calling for congressional outreach an indication of a more politically engaged electorate or merely an outcropping of a citizenry that's been engaged for some time?

Political engagement ebbs and flows over time, although the current level of engagement is indicative of a heightened sense of action in response to the Trump administration. As our politics become more polarized, which they are, we see louder and more frequent calls for political action. Engagement by those opposed to Trump is particularly strong and vocal since these are people who generally see a positive role for government, yet Trump is altering or dismantling policies and programs that were put in place with that positive role in mind. This is an awakening for many people after an election that defied most predictions.

In the early years of the Obama administration, Tea Party members effectively protested to sink Democratic legislative priorities. Is there a limit on the success grassroots movements can achieve?

To be effective in the policy arena, a grassroots movement needs to connect to policymakers, particularly legislators. This might be done through political protest and the show of numbers, or by having more direct influence in legislative chambers, by electing sympathetic legislators or effectively lobbying legislators. If a grassroots movement is organized in these ways, it can be quite effective. Those opposed to Trump have a significant challenge when both the House and the Senate are controlled by Republicans, but the alliance between congressional Republicans and the Trump White House is likely to be quite tenuous, creating openings for an effective movement to influence legislative priorities.

Are the protests we're seeing today likely to spawn larger, more sustained movements? Are there any indicators that they'll fizzle out or have a broader impact?

It's difficult to sustain a grassroots movement like what we've seen in the past few weeks. A key challenge is maintaining focus on one or a small number of goals and organizing in a way to show some progress in meeting those goals. President Trump's proclivity to tweet and make statements out of the political norm provides a convenient and recurring target for grassroots movements and other groups, although long-term sustainability is still difficult unless goals can be articulated and achieved that will keep the movement together.

During the Vietnam War and in prior eras, the nation saw massive protests. This all happened in an age without social media. Are we giving social media too much credit today for its contributions to mass demonstrations?

Yes, there have long been large-scale protests in American history. Social media did not create these protests. What it does do, however, is facilitate quicker and more widespread actions. With social media and other forms of rapid communications, protest actions can be much more quickly organized, and they can include sites over a much wider geographic area. The protests on the day after President Trump's inauguration took place in cities across the country and around the world. In a pre-internet and pre- world, that is less likely to happen.

Explore further: As Trump takes office, there appears to be little hope of bringing people together, VCU political scientist says

Related Stories

Apple, Google, Uber join fight against Trump travel ban

February 6, 2017

Dozens of tech companies, including behemoths like Apple, Google, and Facebook, are siding with Washington state and Minnesota as they fight President Donald Trump's ban on refugees and travelers from seven predominantly ...

Uber chief quits Trump advisory group after uproar

February 3, 2017

Uber chief executive Travis Kalanick on Thursday quit US President Donald Trump's business advisory group, as a movement grew to dump the ride-sharing service because of his connection to the new administration.

Recommended for you

New paper answers causation conundrum

November 17, 2017

In a new paper published in a special issue of the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, SFI Professor Jessica Flack offers a practical answer to one of the most significant, and most confused questions in evolutionary ...

Chance discovery of forgotten 1960s 'preprint' experiment

November 16, 2017

For years, scientists have complained that it can take months or even years for a scientific discovery to be published, because of the slowness of peer review. To cut through this problem, researchers in physics and mathematics ...

2 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

rderkis
1 / 5 (1) Feb 20, 2017
Most of the past historical protests had a focused objective.example "Get out of Vietnam". Most of today's protesters have no clear cut united objectives. Look at the variety of signs describing their cause in a modern protest. You will see everything from "stop immigration" to "ban smoking in smoking parlors" all in the same protest.
Perhaps that is because most their objectives have to do with what might happen or could happen etc.
manfredparticleboard
1 / 5 (2) Feb 28, 2017
Information has a quality factor, what we are dealing with these days is a low signal to noise ratio. Good coherent information is lost to a roar of noise by the torrent of information the internet delivers. Once the internet was like an encyclopaedia, you look up an index and it points you to a series of relevant pages. Now it's like getting off a tourist boat in a third world nation and asking where is the nearest post office. A thousand hands and voices trying to sell you cheap shit you don't want or need or offers on a cheap taxi ride by my brother (wife clutches purse a little tighter) is all you get. The information age failed us.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.