Car drivers cause the most pollution in London – but are least exposed to it themselves

February 10, 2017, University of Surrey
Credit: CC0 Public Domain

Car drivers in London are causing the most pollution per commuter, a new study by the University of Surrey has found. But drivers themselves are the commuters least exposed to harmful particulate matter (PM), when compared with those taking the Underground or the bus.

The study, which is published in Environment International today, found that those on the Underground are the most exposed to poor air quality during their commutes to work, followed by those on buses. In the Underground, trains with open windows leave passengers far more exposed to than those with closed windows.

Air pollution in typical commuting routes was assessed with personal real-time monitors. The study found that passengers on the District line in trains with closed windows were exposed to far lower concentrations of PM than those travelling on trains with open windows on the same line. PM levels were higher on trains on the Victoria and Northern lines, all of which had open windows, and in particular on those in tunnels.

But the research did not find conclusive evidence to suggest that those from more deprived areas were more exposed to pollution than those from less deprived areas. However, people from areas with low deprivation have a predominant use of car, receiving the lower doses while generating the largest emissions per person. The opposite is observed for people from higher deprivation areas, who rely more on buses.

It is estimated that around 9,400 Londoners die every year due to , costing the economy £3.7bn. The study investigated how exposed passengers were to PMs and black carbon during their commutes to work.

Dr Prashant Kumar from the University of Surrey, who led the study, said: "We found that there is definitely an element of environmental injustice among those commuting in London, with those who create the most pollution having the least exposure to it."

Earlier work of the research group found relatively higher penetration of small-sized ultrafine particles into cars compared with coarse particles, owing to a relatively greater efficiency of car filtering systems towards large-sized particles.

Dr Kumar added: "There is an interesting trade-off of exposure between different modes of transport. For example, commuters travelling to work on Underground trains are exposed to the highest levels of large-sized particles while being exposed to the highest level of and ultrafine particles during commute in buses.

"The relatively new airtight trains with closed windows showed a significant difference to the levels of people are exposed to over time, suggesting that operators should consider this aspect during any upgrade of Underground trains, along with the ways to improve ventilation in underground tunnels."

Explore further: As traffic piles up, so does air pollution

More information: Ioar Rivas et al. Exposure to air pollutants during commuting in London: Are there inequalities among different socio-economic groups?, Environment International (2017). DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2017.01.019

Related Stories

Sitting in traffic jams is officially bad for you

August 25, 2016

With millions of motorists in the UK set to hit the road for the bank holiday weekend, drivers have been urged to close windows and turn off fans while in traffic jams to avoid breathing in dangerously high levels of air ...

Diesel trains may expose passengers to exhaust

February 8, 2017

A new study from U of T Engineering finds that diesel trains may expose passengers to elevated levels of certain pollutants, especially if they are sitting directly behind the locomotive.

Why slowing down London's subway could make it more efficient

September 28, 2015

(Phys.org)—An international team of researchers has found that because of interconnectedness between methods of transportation, slowing down trains in London's subway (The Underground, or tube) would actually increase efficiency. ...

Recommended for you

How the Elwha dam removals changed the river's mouth

January 19, 2018

For decades, resource managers agreed that removing the two dams on the Elwha River would be a big win for the watershed as a whole and, in particular, for its anadromous trout and salmon. The dams sat on the river for more ...

5 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

gkam
3.2 / 5 (9) Feb 10, 2017
It is time to make electric transportation mandatory in some areas. The benefits go far beyond pollution, and when the owners of the EVs realize how maintenance-free and efficient they are, they will not go back to the ICE, unless they are adolescents who need a Big Noise.
3Travis
not rated yet Feb 10, 2017
The worst and provenly carcinogenic fumes to be eliminated from the streets of London shall be the fraudulent diesels of VW and more german diesels. This has to be done immediately possible. Then the rest to be phased out and pedal or tiny electric shall be allowed in the centre.
PoppaJ
not rated yet Feb 11, 2017
Duuuuuh. Said Mr Obvious. Now how about a study on second hand flatulence toxisity and its long term effects on pepole outside the vehicle.
jonesdave
3 / 5 (2) Feb 11, 2017
Probably the same people doing this who give you a dirty look if you take a sneaky puff on your e-cig in a pub.
TheGhostofOtto1923
3 / 5 (2) Feb 11, 2017
Re the pic

Nice clock. They ought to clean it some time i think.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.