A social reboot for illegal downloaders

January 3, 2017

Unauthorized downloading of digital goods, including copyright music, videos, computer games, and images has become an increasing problem for content providers and those who hold the copyright on such goods and expect remuneration for distribution. A new research study in the International Journal of Business Environment suggests that content providers must take a pragmatic view based on social consensus to persuade illicit downloaders that their behaviour is economically and ethically unacceptable behaviour among their peer group or other social group to which they belong.

Eva Hofmann of the Centre for Trust, Peace and Social Relations, Coventry University, UK and Elfriede Penz of the Institute for International Marketing Management, at Vienna University of Economics and Business, in Austria, explain that unauthorised sharing of digital content, often referred to as "piracy", is well-entrenched in popular culture. However, they have discerned a difference in the way those downloading pirated content and the legal downloaders decide on how to obtain the content they desire from the internet.

Inherent in the problem for copyright holders is that digital can be duplicated endlessly without loss of fidelity, this benefit of the digital realm makes piracy easy but also points to the value of such goods as being less than traditional, physical items in the realm of content, such as CDs and DVDs. This makes the moral decision less onerous for illegal downloaders than were they to steal a CD or DVD from a high street shop. Interestingly, some earlier studies have suggested that does not detrimentally affects sales of physical goods and that many so-called pirates actually spend more on entertainment overall. Nevertheless, the sale of CDs and related goods are in decline and the industry blames piracy largely for declining numbers of units shifted. Conversely, consumers often cite the high price of as justification for engaging in unauthorised downloading.

"In the era of digitisation, exchanging goods for material and immaterial compensation or for a feeling of sheer altruism remains an important human behaviour," the team says, "But rather than tightening enforcement to protect their assets would benefit more by initiating communication with the illegal downloaders and profiting from global online networking rather than fighting it."

Explore further: Jury sides against Cox in 'trailblazing' music piracy case

More information: Hofmann, E. and Penz, E. (2016) 'The moral decision-making process of unauthorised downloading', Int. J. Business Environment, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp.385-407. DOI: 10.1504/IJBE.2016.10001657

Related Stories

Recommended for you

Volvo to supply Uber with self-driving cars (Update)

November 20, 2017

Swedish carmaker Volvo Cars said Monday it has signed an agreement to supply "tens of thousands" of self-driving cars to Uber, as the ride-sharing company battles a number of different controversies.

2 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

ta2025
not rated yet Jan 03, 2017
Yet the media companies are making more money than they ever have before. Video piracy is not a real problem. People will still pay to see a GOOD movie. But paying $15 -$20 to see a good movie and then $12 for popcorn and a coke??
xponen
not rated yet Jan 11, 2017
Blame capitalism and legacy currency system, eg: expensive physical media due to high business cost, and obscene amount of steps (and services) required to buy online credits/items.

Which cumulatively result in; effectively no desired product in store at all.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.