The glorification of history may give rise to a willingness to fight in a war

January 20, 2017, University of the Basque Country

In order to study the perceptions held by people all over the world about historical figures and events, as well as what the sense of history is, researchers in the UPV/EHU consolidated social psychology research group participated in the World History Survey (WHS). The survey was conducted on the perceptions of historical figures and events held by over 7,000 university students from 40 countries all over the world.

One of the numerous studies that this survey has produced was based on the analysis of beliefs about the meaning and sense of . The survey comprised a set of phrases referring to six general beliefs, and "we were able to study the extent to which the people from each country agreed or disagreed with them," explained Magdalena Bobowik, a researcher in the UPV/EHU's consolidated group and participant in the study.

One of the beliefs she studied was the theological approach to history in which the development of history is understood to depend on the will of a power greater than man. The second belief highlights the cyclical nature of the unfolding of humanity and offers a view of history as well as a set of alternating periods of order and disorder. The third focuses on the great men and women who have determined the course of history. Fourth is the view of history as the progress of humanity in which scientific and technological development is emphasized as the principal factor in history. Another of the beliefs proposes wars as the main agents for change and for the course of history. And lastly comes the critical or pessimistic view of history in which one understands that there is no point in history, from which nothing can be learned.

Beyond accounting for the degree of agreement and disagreement with these beliefs expressed by the university students participating in the survey, the researchers were able to establish correlations between the most widespread beliefs in specific countries and the predominant cultural values in these societies and their level of , as well as the to fight in a possible war. However, Bobowik pointed out that the results "do not fully represent the societies studied, because for methodological reasons, the survey was only conducted with ."

From the wealth of results obtained, Bobowik highlights the fact that "the beliefs showing the greatest association with a willingness to fight in a war are the most determinist ones, the ones that argue that the course of history depends on other forces or laws. These people accept that what happens happens, because that is the nature of things. In general terms, these beliefs are rejected to a greater extent in western countries and find greater acceptance in Asian countries, countries with lower human development, and with more traditional, materialistic cultures."

Nevertheless, the willingness to fight in a war is also associated with a dominant, universal belief in all contexts and cultures, which is the one that regards the course of history as social progress. "This is a more linear view. It makes people more optimistic and resilient in the face of difficulties when they think that as human beings, progress is being made. This positivist view of history has a component of glorification of the past, that our ancestors were heroes, and violence is justified," added Bobowik.

At the other extreme are the more developed countries with a higher index of human development with more individualistic and egalitarian cultures and views. These people have been found to position themselves against fighting in a war. Contrary to what the researchers had expected to find, they emerge in agreement with the that emphasize wars or violence as important factors in the development of history, but "they do so from a critical perspective."

Importance of the history narrative in education

The huge difference found between the participants in different have led Bobowik to conclude that "the narratives of the past, the ones that determine how people understand history, likewise determine people's response to contemporary conflicts, and may go as far as influencing their willingness to get involved in specific military actions."

These conclusions should be taken into consideration "when it comes to developing curricula within the education systems, because the stories may often vary depending on who is telling them. You have to bear in mind that the representations of history, the narratives of our past, may influence violent trends on a collective level of society. As I see it, the capacity of students should be developed so that they can make a more critical analysis of the past, because presenting history through heroes and villains may have repercussions when position themselves before present and future conflicts," concluded the researcher.

Explore further: Einstein and Hitler, the hero and the villain of world history

More information: Darío Páez et al, Social representations of history, cultural values, and willingness to fight in a war: A collective-level analysis in 40 nations, Asian Journal of Social Psychology (2016). DOI: 10.1111/ajsp.12153

Related Stories

Motivating eco-friendly behaviors depends on cultural values

August 31, 2016

The specific cultural values of a country may determine whether concern about environmental issues actually leads individuals to engage in environmentally friendly behaviors, according to the new research published in Psychological ...

Do witchcraft beliefs halt economic progress?

May 10, 2016

Believing in witchcraft is a salient feature of daily life in many parts of the world. In worst-case scenarios, such beliefs lead to murder, and they may also cause destruction of property or societal ostracism of the accused ...

Recommended for you

Solving the mystery of an unusual medieval text

July 20, 2018

When historian Rowan Dorin first stepped onto the Stanford campus in early 2017, he made it a habit to visit Green Library every week to dig through its collection of medieval documents and objects.

7 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Shootist
Jan 28, 2017
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
cantdrive85
1 / 5 (1) Jan 28, 2017
The propaganda used by the powers that be is applicable to all levels of society, not just at war time. Revisionist history is one of their most useful tools in their aims to secure the leadership of economics, education, and gov't into fewer and fewer hands/POV's.
There are no heros in the American military these days nor have there been for a very long time (before WWI), they are little more than paid thugs for the socio-economic elites who use the media to spread their propaganda. There is no honor in killing/maiming for money/power of the few.
antialias_physorg
5 / 5 (3) Jan 28, 2017
Apex civilization

What does that even mean?
gkam
1.8 / 5 (5) Jan 28, 2017
"What does that even mean?"

Fascism. A dictatorship.

It is nationalism which causes war. I learned that in grade school. And we are once again going to wallow in the self-righteous feelings of being better than others in our minds, so anything we do to others is okay.

America first! (The world last).

julianpenrod
1 / 5 (3) Jan 28, 2017
gkam falls into the trap.
gkam says they "learned in grade school" that nationalism causes wars.
That is untrue. They were told in grade school to believe that nationalism causes wars, and they went along with it. Wars are complicated things, requiring paperwork, scheduling, allocation, man power. The facets most often seen acting in war, producing it even when a majority don't want it, preventing it even if a majority want it, are money and power, and those are the New World Order, the collection of all individuals at the top of the conventional economic system. They arrange wars when they want and get the gullible who believe what they are told to believe to accept it.
gkam
1 / 5 (4) Jan 28, 2017
"That is untrue."
---------------------------

Were you there, in my grade school class when we learned about nationalism?

Will the Trump Wars be nuclear?
antialias_physorg
4 / 5 (4) Jan 28, 2017
That is untrue. They were told in grade school to believe that nationalism causes wars, and they went along with it.

They arrange wars when they want and get the gullible who believe what they are told to believe to accept it.

Arguably nationalism makes this easier. People who are infused with national 'pride' turn inward - they start to see anyone else as inferior. Consequently they think that just because of their (perceived) superiority they cannot lose, so it becomes much easier for them to accept waging wars. Note that this has been pretty much the MOD of the US since the 1950's.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.