Climate change helped kill off super-sized Ice Age animals in Australia

January 26, 2017, Vanderbilt University
Credit: Vanderbilt University

During the last Ice Age, Australia, Tasmania and New Guinea formed a single landmass, called Sahul. It was a strange and often hostile place populated by a bizarre cast of giant animals.

There were 500-pound (227kg) kangaroos, marsupial tapirs the size of horses and wombat-like creatures the size of hippos. There were flightless birds that weighed twice as much as modern emu, 33-foot (10m) snakes, 20-foot (6m) crocodiles, 8-foot (2.5m) turtles with horned heads and spiked tails, and giant monitor lizards that measured greater than 6 feet from tip to tail and were likely venomous.

By about 30,000 years ago, however, most of these 'megafauna' had disappeared from the Sahul as part of a global mass extinction that saw the end of nearly all of the super-sized animals that had evolved to survive in extreme Ice Age climates. The factors that forced the Australian megafauna into extinction remain a matter of considerable controversy. Many experts argue that the ancestors of the Australian aborigines, who made an appearance approximately 50,000 years ago, either hunted them into extinction or gradually destroyed the habitat they required by practices such as fire-stick burning. Others argue that the gradual drying out of Australia and weakening of the Australian monsoon played a major role in their demise.

A new study has compared the diet of a variety of Australian megafaunal herbivores from the period when they were widespread (350,000 to 570,000 years ago) to a period when they were in decline (30,000 to 40,000 years ago) by studying their . The analysis suggests that climate change had a significant impact on their diets and may well have been a primary factor in their extinction.

"We have found evidence that, as the climate was changing and getting drier, animal diets were shifting dramatically," said Larisa DeSantis, assistant professor of earth and environmental studies at Vanderbilt University, who directed the study. "If climate change was a primary or contributing factor in their demise, as it appears, we need to pay more attention to how current levels of are affecting animals today."

The results of the study are described in a paper titled "Dietary responses of Sahul (Pleistocene Australia-New Guinea) megafauna to climate and environmental change" published Jan. 26 by the journal Paleobiology. Co-authors on the paper are Judith Field and John Dodson from the University of New South Wales and Stephen Wroe from the University of New England.

Changes in the diets of the super-sized megafauna that ruled Australia during the last Ice Age indicate that climate change was a major factor in their extinction. Credit: Zachary Eagles, Vanderbilt University

Michael Archer, a leading Australian paleontologist at the University of New South Wales who was not involved in the study, commented, "This new study, based on hard evidence, makes it clear that changes in late Pleistocene climate had a major impact on the late Pleistocene megafauna of Australia, adding even more evidence to challenge the imaginative a priori assumption that 'blitzkrieg' by early humans caused the extinction of this continent's lost megafauna. Climate change clearly has been in the past and will continue to be a major cause of extinction into the future."

The teeth that were analyzed came from the Cuddie Springs site in southeastern Australia. It is located on a prehistoric ephemeral lake and it is the only site on mainland Australia that has produced fossil evidence of the co-existence of humans and megafauna. "Unfortunately, many of the advocates of the human predation hypothesis have discounted Cuddie Springs because it does not support the popular 'blitzkrieg' theory that maintains the megafauna went extinct in the 1,000-year period after humans arrived on the scene," said DeSantis.

It's amazing how much information about the prehistoric environment paleontologists can extract from fossil teeth using a dental drill, dental impression material and some sophisticated instruments. The ratios of oxygen and carbon isotopes locked in the enamel provide clues about the animals' diet and the average temperature and humidity of the environment at the time the teeth formed.

Differences within individual teeth mirror climate variability. Analysis of the microscopic scratches on the surface of the teeth provides evidence of what the animal was eating in the last few weeks of its life. Differences in wear-patterns can differentiate between animals that were grazing on grass and browsing on bushes.

"For example, we know from the analysis of modern day kangaroos that oxygen isotope ratios in their teeth are highly correlated with the relative humidity and amount of precipitation in their environment," DeSantis said. "This makes them ideally suited for tracking changes in aridity over time."

During the megafaunal heyday around 500,000 years ago, the dental analysis revealed that the climate was semi-arid. In addition, the animals' diets were highly variable, implying that there were a number of ecological niches available to them. That contrasts markedly with the period from 30,000 to 40,000 years ago. Here, the analysis indicates that the climate was substantially drier and the diet of the giant herbivores was considerably more restricted.

"It appears that long-term aridification may have reduced the ability of megafauna to consume certain types of plants, including salt-bush. Eating salt-rich plants requires drinking additional water that was less available and likely increased competition for similar plant resources," said DeSantis. "These data clarify the impacts of climatic change on marsupial megafauna and suggest that the long-term drying out of Australia, identified here and in other records, likely played a key role in the decline and disappearance of this unique suite of animals."

Explore further: Humans, not climate change, wiped out Australian megafauna

Related Stories

Humans, not climate change, wiped out Australian megafauna

January 20, 2017

New evidence involving the ancient poop of some of the huge and astonishing creatures that once roamed Australia indicates the primary cause of their extinction around 45,000 years ago was likely a result of humans, not climate ...

Disappearing lakes stoke megafauna debate

February 25, 2015

New research into central Australia's ancient lakes has found evidence that climate change contributed to the extinction of the continent's megafauna.

New evidence links humans to megafauna demise

January 21, 2010

( -- A new scientific paper co-authored by a University of Adelaide researcher reports strong evidence that humans, not climate change, caused the demise of Australia's megafauna -- giant marsupials, huge reptiles ...

Early humans linked to ancient Australian extinction

October 22, 2015

While the anthropogenic impact on global species diversity is clear, the role of ancient human populations in causing extinctions is more controversial. New data presented this week at the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology ...

Recommended for you

T. Rex couldn't stick out its tongue, new research shows

June 20, 2018

Dinosaurs are often depicted as fierce creatures, baring their teeth, with tongues wildly stretching from their mouths like giant, deranged lizards. But new research reveals a major problem with this classic image: Dinosaurs ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

3 / 5 (2) Jan 26, 2017
Ancient humans may not have been the prime cause of the destruction of Australian mega fauna but does anyone believe that if they (and later Europeans) hadn't turned up that there wouldn't be pockets of these mega fauna surviving today? Australia after all encompasses a vast range of habitats and environments from the Central Desert to the Snowy Mountains. In between huge rain forests and temperate forest regions as well as open scrub land and pasture which currently supports millions of sheep and cattle.
2.5 / 5 (6) Jan 26, 2017
So funny. This article reaches the opposite conclusion of a PHYS.ORG article a few days ago "Humans, not climate change, wiped out Australian megafauna" whose link appears above.

Let's just say that this "science" is far from settled.

5 / 5 (1) Jan 26, 2017
"it is the only site on mainland Australia that has produced fossil evidence of the co-existence of humans and megafauna." And therefore humans didn't kill the megafauna? Because in one place it took more than 1000 years? Or maybe humans didn't have the same population density everywhere at once?

Come on, we did it. Guilty as charged. Didgeridoo.

5 / 5 (1) Jan 27, 2017
They even used the same 1st image on both articles.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.