Why general counsels don't stop corporate crime

December 1, 2016 by Greta Guest, University of Michigan

General counsels for corporations are well-versed in the law and should be able to detect and stop fraud, not profit from stock sales utilizing their fraud-related insider information.

Researchers from the University of Michigan zeroed in on the potential reasons that corporate counsels are failing to report and prevent corporate crime.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 was an answer to rampant corporate involving companies such as Enron, Worldcom and Tyco. The act required corporate attorneys to report any suspicion of violation to top executives and board of directors.

"More than any other executives in the corporation, corporate attorneys are expected to understand potential violations of law," said Nejat Seyhun, finance professor at U-M's Ross School of Business. "They are expected to use their legal expertise to advise, intervene and stop wrongdoing."

Seyhun and S. Burcu Avci, a research scholar, analyzed insider trading activities of top executives, general counsels and other officials listed in Securities Class Action database. Looking at cases filed in federal court from 1996-2014, they compared those with data and found that general counsels were more aggressive sellers of company stock than other executives.

General counsels increased their sales of stock during the class action period by 63 percent, which indicates that they were aware of the overvaluation of their common stock due to the fraud and were acting proactively to reduce their potential losses by reducing their holdings.

The fraudulent activity costs shareholders billions. The average class action settles for $170 million, they found. Given this, the estimated range of damages caused by the alleged fraud is between $6 billion and $30 billion.

"Our evidence shows that general counsels are part of the fraudulent group," Seyhun said. "They are heavy sellers of their own firm's stocks and profit abnormally by avoiding the price declines upon revelation of the fraud at the end of the period."

Explore further: Gender Trading Gap: Male executives fare better than their female colleagues on insider trades

More information: Sureyya Burcu Avci et al. Why Donnt General Counsels Stop Corporate Crime?, SSRN Electronic Journal (2016). DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2804352

Related Stories

Insider trading: Another glass ceiling?

October 8, 2008

(PhysOrg.com) -- Martha Stewart notwithstanding, female executives who legally trade on inside information make nice, tidy profits—but not as much as men in the same positions, say researchers at the University of Michigan's ...

Recommended for you

Light-based production of drug-discovery molecules

February 18, 2019

Photoelectrochemical (PEC) cells are widely studied for the conversion of solar energy into chemical fuels. They use photocathodes and photoanodes to "split" water into hydrogen and oxygen respectively. PEC cells can work ...


Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.