Online freedom hit by pressure on social media, apps

November 14, 2016
A recent report released by watchdog group Freedom House says 34 of the 65 countries assessed saw internet freedom deteriorate since June 2015

Governments around the world have stepped up efforts to block or censor social media and messaging applications, in a new blow to internet freedom, a watchdog group said Monday.

The Freedom on the Net report by the activist group Freedom House said online freedom declined in 2016 for a sixth consecutive year amid new restrictions on messaging platforms such as WhatsApp in addition to social networks.

"Popular social media sites like Facebook and Twitter have been subject to growing censorship for several years, but governments are now increasingly going after messaging apps like WhatsApp and Telegram," said Sanja Kelly, director of the study.

Messaging apps have become increasingly popular tools for activists, and many of them can offer encrypted communications which make it more difficult for the users to be monitored, the report noted.

"The key reason for the block of these apps is preventing users from disseminating news during periods of unrest," Kelly said.

The report said 34 of the 65 countries assessed in the report have seen internet freedom deteriorate since June 2015.

Some of the notable declines were in Uganda, Bangladesh, Cambodia, Ecuador and Libya, while online freedom improved in Sri Lanka and Zambia and in the United States, due to the passage of a law limiting collection of telecommunications metadata.

Freedom House said 67 percent of internet users live in countries where criticism of the government, military, or ruling family is subject to censorship.

Governments in 24 countries limited or blocked access to social media and communication tools, up from 15 in the previous year.

Even some democratic governments have been targeting applications that use encryption features seen as a threat to national security. WhatsApp faced restrictions in 12 of the 65 countries analyzed, more than any other app.

"Although the blocking of these tools affects everyone, it has an especially harmful impact on human rights defenders, journalists, and marginalized communities who often depend on these apps to bypass government surveillance," said Kelly.

China labeled worst

China was the world's worst offender for a second year, according to the report, followed by Syria and Iran.

Freedom House criticized a new Chinese law that allows for seven-year prison terms for spreading rumors on social media, a charge often used to imprison political activists.

It said some users in China belonging to minority religious groups were imprisoned for watching religious videos on mobile phones.

The report said authorities in 38 countries made arrests based on social media posts over the past year, an increase of more than 50 percent since 2013. Prison sentences imposed in some countries exceeded ten years. Some have been jailed for merely sharing or "liking" content on Facebook.

"When authorities sentence users to long prison terms for simply criticizing government policies online, almost everyone becomes much more reluctant to post anything that could get them in similar trouble," Kelly said.

At least 15 countries temporarily shut down internet or mobile networks as another way of limiting online activism, the report said.

Some governments broadened the range of censorship to include images, caricatures and even emojis deemed offensive by regimes, Freedom House said.

In Egypt, for example, a student who posted a photo depicting President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi with Mickey Mouse ears got a three-year prison term.

"When faced with humorous memes and cartoons of themselves, some world leaders are thin-skinned and lash out," said Kelly.

"Instead of enjoying a good laugh, they try to remove the images and imprison anyone posting them online."

Explore further: Online freedom hit as governments ramp up surveillance

Related Stories

Online freedom declines, amid NSA effect

December 4, 2014

Internet freedom suffered this year as a growing number of countries stepped up efforts to spy on users and censor online postings, a global survey showed Thursday.

China passes controversial cybersecurity law

November 7, 2016

China on Monday passed a controversial cybersecurity bill further tightening restrictions on online freedom of speech, raising concerns that it could intensify already wide-ranging Internet censorship.

Iran rounds up 450 social network users

August 23, 2016

Iran has "arrested or summoned" around 450 social media users over their online activities, a website linked to the powerful Revolutionary Guards said on Tuesday.

Facebook launches 'lite' version of Messenger overseas

October 3, 2016

Facebook is launching a "lite" version of it Messenger chat app. It is aimed at emerging markets, where many people use older phones that don't have enough room to store or ability to run the full-featured application due ...

Recommended for you

Printing microelectrode array sensors on gummi candy

June 22, 2018

Microelectrodes can be used for direct measurement of electrical signals in the brain or heart. These applications require soft materials, however. With existing methods, attaching electrodes to such materials poses significant ...

EU copyright law passes key hurdle

June 20, 2018

A highly disputed European copyright law that could force online platforms such as Google and Facebook to pay for links to news content passed a key hurdle in the European Parliament on Wednesday.

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

NIPSZX
not rated yet Nov 14, 2016
This regulation is useless because the people will shift from one social platform to another immediately after the regulation. If Facebook is hit with blocking, then a new app will appear that will be a Facebook clone without the regulation, and that one will fill up. When it is hit with regulation, a new one will appear and so forth and so on. It will be similar to torrent regulation. It will only lead to the demise of Facebook and twitter and the big names. Newer and smaller startups will swoop in and grab everybody and the freedom will remain, only shifting to a different platform. Save Section 230! Besides if our own president can write hateful, bullying social media posts, the public should be allowed to write what they please also. Do not be misconstrued, the big media are at fault the most. The small media should be allowed to fabricate also. It is the consumers responsibility to distinguish the real from the fake. If not, then get courts ready for millions of cases!

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.