SpaceX closer to understanding rocket explosion at pad

SpaceX closer to understanding rocket explosion at pad
This Thursday, Sept. 8, 2016 file photo shows the damaged SpaceX launch complex 41 at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station in Florida. The company's Falcon 9 rocket exploded during its launch on Sept. 1. paceX is closer to understanding last month's rocket explosion at its launch pad. On Friday, Oct. 28, 2016 SpaceX said the investigation has been further narrowed to one of the pressurized helium containers, located in the second-stage oxygen tank. (Red Huber/Florida Today via AP, File)

SpaceX said Friday it's closer to understanding last month's rocket explosion at the launch pad and aims to resume flights by year's end.

The company already had targeted the rocket's helium system as being breached. On Friday, SpaceX said the investigation has been further narrowed to one of the pressurized helium containers, located in the second-stage oxygen tank.

In recent testing, SpaceX said it's managed to recreate a system failure, noting it can happen entirely through helium-loading conditions, namely temperature and pressure. More tests are planned at SpaceX facilities in Texas to identify the precise cause.

The unmanned Falcon rocket erupted in a fireball Sept. 1 during prelaunch testing at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station. Both the rocket and the satellite on board were destroyed. Facebook had wanted to use the Israeli-made satellite to spread internet access in Africa.

It was the second Falcon failure in just over a year for Elon Musk, the billionaire behind SpaceX. In June 2015, a rocket loaded with space station supplies erupted shortly after liftoff. Company officials said the two accidents were unrelated, although the 2015 loss also originated in the upper-stage helium system. In that instance, a support strut broke.

"SpaceX's efforts are now focused on two areas - finding the exact root cause, and developing improved helium loading conditions that allow SpaceX to reliably load Falcon 9," the company said on its web site. "This is an important milestone on the path to returning to flight."

Falcon rockets have been grounded as SpaceX conducts the investigation along with NASA, the Air Force, the Federal Aviation Administration and industry experts. The California-based company has about 70 launches in line, worth more than $10 billion.

The September explosion—which occurred as the rocket was being fueled for a test-firing of its engines—damaged the SpaceX launch pad. Until repairs can be completed, the company has the option of launching from its soon-to-be-modified pad at neighboring Kennedy Space Center—once used by NASA's moon rockets and space shuttles—or from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California.

Besides launching commercial satellites, SpaceX hauls supplies to the International Space Station for NASA and is developing a bigger Falcon capable of flying astronauts to the orbiting lab in another year or two. Less than two weeks ago, NASA's other major shipper, Orbital ATK, resumed launches from Wallops Island, Virginia, following an explosion of its Antares rocket soon after liftoff in 2014.


Explore further

SpaceX: Accident points to breach in rocket's helium system

More information: SpaceX: www.spacex.com/

© 2016 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.

Citation: SpaceX closer to understanding rocket explosion at pad (2016, October 28) retrieved 16 June 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2016-10-spacex-closer-rocket-explosion-pad.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
18 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Oct 29, 2016
Er. It's been obvious from the start that the breech was on the second stage. Space-X did not just 'narrow it down' from any old helium tank to the second stage helium tank. Bad reporting!

But there is news here, if it's correct. To date all that we had heard from Space-X about the cause of the explosion was that 'procedures' might have caused it. Now we are hearing, for the first time, that the procedure for pressurizing the helium tank might have caused the tank to breach.

This cannot be the entire engineering story. There's some complexity here. Pressurizing the helium tank happens in a sequence that involves also adding LOX and kerosene to their tanks. The LOX is cold - especially cold on Space-X launch vehicles. The carbon fiber helium bottle might be vulnerable to delamination and failure if transient temperature gradients are too extreme.

I think it's an open question whether the bottle's design is safe enough.

Oct 29, 2016
It's possible that fueling procedural adjustments will improve the chances of the bottle surviving. But I have to wonder if procedures alone can reduce the risk low enough to warrant human passengers.

I'm remembering that the first live launch failure in 2015 also involved the same tank. Supposedly, a substandard strut holding the tank in position gave way, the tank came loose and was smashed apart, releasing high-pressure helium into the LOX tank and causing the explosion, but there's no question that a breach of the same helium tank was implicated in that 2015 explosion. It could be that the bad strut was merely a coincidental defect and did not cause the explosion at all.

I hope Space-X will take a long hard look at that tank's design.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more