Control system serpent: Scientists propose new model for automation

October 20, 2016, Chinese Association of Automation

In 360 BC, Plato wrote, "Whatever comes into existence always comes as a whole." In 2016, scientists are using the same philosophy to develop a new automation model for robotic systems.

"No phenomenon exists entirely alone. Each is a part of other phenomena," wrote Hua Chen, an associate professor at Hohai University, Chanzhou Campus, with YangQuan Chen, a professor at the School of Engineering, University of California, Merced.

In a paper published in IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica (JAS), Chen and Chen proposed a new model for designing used in automation. Traditionally, a control system consists of a machine directing or responding to another machine's behavior. Each piece is precisely defined as a cause and effect. The proposed model disregards such definitions.

The authors write of the ouroboros, an ancient symbol of a snake eating its own tail, as a representative example of their method. It's impossible to decipher how the snake came to bite itself, nor to clearly define where the head ends and the tail begins. The circle supports itself as a whole system.

"Different from the traditional control standpoint, the principle of the self-support idea treats the control inputs as an essential part of the control system dynamics itself," Hua Chen said. "In other words, in a closed-loop setting, control input signals and [the] system's behaviors are interlaced, serving mutually a cause-and-effect pair—thus, a 'one-snake' picture."

By thinking of the whole instead of separate parts, it's possible to create a better system capable of goals with variable parameters, such as an autonomous vehicle tracking an unknown target. "Our suggested [generalized fractional-order principle of self-support] control strategy is an important method when considering the system with long-term memory, [as] our methods can be less model dependent or even model-free, yet with desirable robustness characteristics," said Hua Chen.

The mathematics supporting the proposed method rely on the inclusive attributes of fractional order calculus, in which a single equation may be used to describe several potential outcomes over a significant length of time. The results of such mathematics then inform the next step, so any miscalculations can be corrected on the fly within the system.

"Just as [with the snake circle]," Hua Chen said, "if we consider the control input as [part of] its inner dynamics—[meaning] the controller is not the reason of moving—it also can be looked [at] as the results of the tracking error feedback."

Explore further: Scientists simplify model for human behavior in automation

More information: Fractional-order Generalized Principle of Self-support (FOGPSS) in Control System Design: … tp=&arnumber=7589490

Related Stories

Scientists simplify model for human behavior in automation

October 14, 2016

Human unpredictability is a problem in the automated human-machine systems people use every day. Scientists from Nanjing Institute of Technology's School of Automation in China and the University of California, Merced's School ...

When output becomes part of input

September 19, 2016

Neurofeedback is a technique used for the treatment of clinical disorders (like depression, anxiety, chronic pain, ADHD and schizophrenia etc.) and enhancement of brain performance. It is based on the "self-regulation" of ...

Electromagnets and sensors track the motions of fingers

December 23, 2015

A university's ubiquitous computing lab has teamed up with virtual reality company Oculus to work on a system capable of precisely tracking finger movements. You and your VR game in the future could be thriving on magnets ...

Recommended for you

Semimetals are high conductors

March 18, 2019

Researchers in China and at UC Davis have measured high conductivity in very thin layers of niobium arsenide, a type of material called a Weyl semimetal. The material has about three times the conductivity of copper at room ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Oct 24, 2016
It's like defining a superposition of all charges in the universe to define the location of a virtual charge relative to any charge in the universe, i.e. everything. I get it, but we can define the control morally, ethically, physically, socially, etc..

Not sure about the metaphor, it doesn't seem to be making progress.

Of course we can define all physical things; but, social, same algorithm, different definition of the field. That is the expected relationship to each & ...
not rated yet Oct 24, 2016
I see control and AI as separate, you gotta make it make sense.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.