New insights into early terrestrial planet formation

October 6, 2016 by Kana Takahama, Tokyo Institute of Technology
The crescent Earth rises above the lunar horizon in this spectacular photograph taken from the Apollo 17 spacecraft in lunar orbit during final lunar landing mission in the Apollo program. Credit: NASA

Scientists at Tokyo Institute of Technology have demonstrated that the relatively high levels of precious metals (gold, platinum, etc.) in the Earth's mantle likely originated from one large-scale planetary impact prior to the formation of the Earth's crust. This implies that the early Earth was a more benign place than previously thought, with fewer impacts from space. The findings are published in Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 4 October 2016.

The debate surrounding the formation of the planets in our solar system, particularly the terrestrial ('rocky') planets, has been ongoing for many years. Scientists have long used computer models coupled with analysis of ancient meteorites to piece together the most likely scenarios that led to the planets forming as we know them today. A few puzzles still remain, including why Mars is much smaller than most models predict, and why the Earth in particular has a large amount of iron-loving, or 'siderophile', material in its mantle. Metals like gold, platinum and palladium would ordinarily be sequestered in the metallic core. The existing explanation for the latter is that the Earth was pummelled by meteors in its early life, leaving the highly siderophile elements (HSE) beneath the crust.

Now, Ramon Brasser and Shigeru Ida at the Earth-Life Science Institute at Tokyo Institute of Technology, Japan, together with an international team of researchers from the University of Colorado (USA), the University of Dundee (UK) and the University of Oslo (Norway), have shown that the Earth's HSE budget was most likely the result of a single, large-scale impact from space rather than the slow accumulation of material from many smaller meteors. This single impact may or may not have been the same one that created the Moon.

Brasser's team simulated the evolution of the up to 300 million years after their first formation, a much longer time-scale than in previous studies. They collated information regarding the precious metal budget of Earth, Moon and Mars, and data on lunar cratering, and ran simulations to determine the circumstances that would fit the observations.

Their results show that the total mass of planetesimals - accumulations of planet-forming material floating in space - at the time of the event that formed the Moon was less than previously thought. Mars accumulated 0.06% of its total mass in meteors during the period of the late veneer on Earth. The single, large-scale impact that created Earth's HSE complement was unique to Earth, and must have occurred before the crust had begun to form around 4.45 billion years ago. Brasser and his team have shown that the early Earth at the time of life's emergence was not under a constant, intense bombardment from meteors as previously thought.

The early solar system

There is still much debate around the early formation and behaviour of the planets that orbit our Sun. While the initial formation processes for the terrestrial planets – accumulation of material into 'planetesimals' followed by the gradual growth into full-size planets – is well-researched, it has proven difficult to solve some of the more complex enigmas about the inner solar system.

Recently, the 'Grand Tack' theory was proposed in which Jupiter shifted its path inwards towards the sun before tracking back to its current position. This movement, together with the formation of Saturn and its associated resonance with Jupiter, meant that the two gas planets pulled an immense amount of debris and material away from the inner solar system when they shifted back outwards. This accounts for the smaller size of Mars and for the current composition of the asteroid belt.

Questions regarding the unexplained high levels of iron-loving material (highly siderophile element, or HSE) in the Earth's mantle, and indeed beneath the crust of Mars, still remain.

Implications of the current study

By combining data from various sources and simulating the early evolution of the terrestrial planets using computer models incorporating the Grand Tack theory, Brasser and his team have provided new insights into the HSE conundrum. Their simulations suggest that the Earth's mantle composition was altered primarily by one large-scale impact – possibly the same impact that created the Moon – rather than by a multitude of small meteor impacts. Their results also show that there was far less debris and material floating in the inner solar system by the time the Moon-forming event occurred than scientists had anticipated. This implies that the early Earth may have been a more benign place than previously thought, and the team suggest that their findings should be incorporated into future simulations of the early solar system.

Explore further: New study finds 'geologic clock' that helps determine Moon's age

More information: R. Brasser et al, Late veneer and late accretion to the terrestrial planets, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Available online 4 October 2016, ISSN 0012-821X, dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2016.09.013.

Related Stories

New clues to the early Solar System from ancient meteorites

July 22, 2012

In order to understand Earth's earliest history--its formation from Solar System material into the present-day layering of metal core and mantle, and crust--scientists look to meteorites. New research from a team including ...

The Earth and Moon formed later than previously thought

June 7, 2010

The Earth and Moon were created as the result of a giant collision between two planets the size of Mars and Venus. Until now it was thought to have happened when the solar system was 30 million years old or approx. 4,537 ...

Our sun may have eaten a super-Earth for breakfast

April 22, 2016

Our solar system sure seems like an orderly place. The orbits of the planets are predictable enough that we can send spacecraft on multi-year journeys to them and they will reliably reach their destinations. But we've only ...

Asteroid Vesta to reshape theories of planet formation

July 16, 2014

EPFL researchers have a better understanding of the asteroid Vesta and its internal structure, thanks to numerical simulations and data from the space mission Dawn. Their findings, published today in Nature, question contemporary ...

Recommended for you

Asteroid 2002 AJ129 to fly safely past Earth February 4

January 22, 2018

Asteroid 2002 AJ129 will make a close approach to Earth on Feb. 4, 2018 at 1:30 p.m. PST (4:30 p.m. EST / 21:30 UTC). At the time of closest approach, the asteroid will be no closer than 10 times the distance between Earth ...

A new bound on axions

January 22, 2018

An axion is a hypothetical elementary particle whose existence was postulated in order to explain why certain subatomic reactions appear to violate basic symmetry constraints, in particular symmetry in time. The 1980 Nobel ...

3 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

katesisco
1 / 5 (5) Oct 06, 2016
Evidence like this will continue to be recognized until we arrive at the conclusion, evident now as in the past, that the Earth was 'veneered' with granite in an electro magnetic event. Was the MOHO the original surface of Earth? Was the granite created by the transmutation of elements by a plasma bolt? Were the precious metals emplaced by this event?
This event may not have been in the far distant past. The sun may not be entirely nuclear. Gravity may not rule Earth. W Brown's In The Beginning may be more correct than wrong. Life may be much more diverse than we see now.
torbjorn_b_g_larsson
5 / 5 (2) Oct 06, 2016
The evidence for an early habitable Earth accumulates. The geological evidence, such as it is [zircons], tells of little impact flow [from no zircon shock fractures] from 4.4 billion years ago and a habitable ocean [from zircon oxygen isotope ratios right after that.

The Apollo rocks that underlies the late bombardment dating attempts sampled the Moon surface right where the Imbrium impact ejecta may have happened, an impact now believed to ejected more material than earlier believed. Maybe Apollo sampled the same contaminated rocks.

And the haphazard way the Moon crust formed means the statistics that saw a spike may simply be a result of a uniformly diminishing impact flow [ http://phys.org/n....html#ms ], consistent with that "early Earth at the time of life's emergence was not under a constant, intense bombardment from meteors as previously thought."
jonesdave
5 / 5 (2) Oct 08, 2016
Evidence like this will continue to be recognized until we arrive at the conclusion, evident now as in the past, that the Earth was 'veneered' with granite in an electro magnetic event. Was the MOHO the original surface of Earth? Was the granite created by the transmutation of elements by a plasma bolt? Were the precious metals emplaced by this event?
This event may not have been in the far distant past. The sun may not be entirely nuclear. Gravity may not rule Earth. W Brown's In The Beginning may be more correct than wrong. Life may be much more diverse than we see now.


And pigs might fly.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.