What happens when black holes collide?

October 5, 2016 by Fraser Cain, Universe Today
What happens when black holes collide?
The more massive the object, the more it distorts spacetime. Credit: LIGO/T. Pyle

The sign of a truly great scientific theory is by the outcomes it predicts when you run experiments or perform observations. And one of the greatest theories ever proposed was the concept of Relativity, described by Albert Einstein in the beginning of the 20th century.

In addition to helping us understand that light is the ultimate speed limit of the universe, Einstein described gravity itself as a warping of spacetime.

He did more than just provide a bunch of elaborate new explanations for the universe, he proposed a series of tests that could be done to find out if his theories were correct.

One test, for example, completely explained why Mercury's orbit didn't match the predictions made by Einstein. Other predictions could be tested with the scientific instruments of the day, like measuring time dilation with fast moving clocks.

Since gravity is actually a distortion of spacetime, Einstein predicted that massive objects moving through spacetime should generate ripples, like waves moving through the ocean.

Just by walking around, you leave a wake of gravitational waves that compress and expand space around you. However, these waves are incredibly tiny. Only the most energetic events in the entire universe can produce waves we can detect.

It took over 100 years to finally be proven true, the direct detection of gravitational waves. In February, 2016, physicists with the Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory, or LIGO announced the collision of two massive black holes more than a billion light-years away.

Credit: Universe Today

Any size of black hole can collide. Plain old stellar mass black holes or supermassive black holes. Same process, just on a completely different scale.

Let's start with the stellar mass black holes. These, of course, form when a star with many times the mass of our sun dies in a supernova. Just like regular stars, these massive stars can be in binary systems.

Imagine a stellar nebula where a pair of binary stars form. But unlike the sun, each of these are monsters with many times the mass of the sun, putting out thousands of times as much energy. The two stars will orbit one another for just a few million years, and then one will detonate as a supernova. Now you'll have a massive star orbiting a black hole. And then the second star explodes, and now you have two black holes orbiting around each other.

As the black holes zip around one another, they radiate gravitational waves which causes their orbit to decay. This is kind of mind-bending, actually. The black holes convert their momentum into gravitational waves.

As their angular momentum decreases, they spiral inward until they actually collide. What should be one of the most energetic explosions in the known universe is completely dark and silent, because nothing can escape a black hole. No radiation, no light, no particles, no screams, nothing. And if you mash two black holes together, you just get a more .

Colliding black holes. Credit: LIGO/A. Simonnet

The gravitational waves ripple out from this momentous collision like waves through the ocean, and it's detectable across more than a billion light-years.

This is exactly what happened earlier this year with the announcement from LIGO. This sensitive instrument detected the gravitational waves generated when two black holes with 30 solar masses collided about 1.3 billion light-years away.

This wasn't a one-time event either, they detected another collision with two other stellar mass black holes.

Regular stellar mass black holes aren't the only ones that can collide. Supermassive black holes can collide too.

From what we can tell, there's a at the heart of pretty much every galaxy in the universe. The one in the Milky Way is more than 4.1 million times the mass of the sun, and the one at the heart of Andromeda is thought to be 110 to 230 million times the mass of the sun.

Arial view of LIGO Livingston. Credit: The LIGO Scientific Collaboration

In a few billion years, the Milky Way and Andromeda are going to collide, and begin the process of merging together. Unless the Milky Way's black hole gets kicked off into deep space, the two black holes are going to end up orbiting one another.

Just with the black holes, they're going to radiate away in the form of gravitational waves, and spiral closer and closer together. Some point, in the distant future, the two black holes will merge into an even more supermassive black hole.

The Milky Way and Andromeda will merge into Milkdromeda, and over the future billions of years, will continue to gather up new galaxies, extract their and mashing them into the collective.

Black holes can absolutely collide. Einstein predicted the this would generate, and now LIGO has observed them for the first time. As better tools are developed, we should learn more and more about these extreme events.

Explore further: Did the LIGO gravitational waves originate from primordial black holes?

Related Stories

First gravitational waves form after 10 million years

September 5, 2016

If two galaxies collide, the merging of their central black holes triggers gravitational waves, which ripple throughout space. An international research team involving the University of Zurich has now calculated that this ...

Using gravitational waves to catch runaway black holes

June 30, 2016

Black holes are the most powerful gravitational force in the Universe. So what could cause them to be kicked out of their host galaxies? Cambridge researchers have developed a method for detecting elusive 'black hole kicks.'

Black holes and measuring gravitational waves

June 16, 2016

The supermassive black holes found at the centre of every galaxy, including our own Milky Way, may, on average, be smaller than we thought, according to work led by University of Southampton astronomer Dr Francesco Shankar.

How much of the universe is black holes?

June 17, 2014

We all fear black holes, but how many of them are there out there, really? Between the stellar mass black holes and the supermassive ones, just how much of our Universe is black holes?

Where is the closest black hole?

March 21, 2016

You know that saying, "keep your friends close, but keep your enemies closer?" That advice needs to go right out the window when we're talking black holes. They're the worst enemies you could have and you want them as far ...

Recommended for you

Coffee-based colloids for direct solar absorption

March 22, 2019

Solar energy is one of the most promising resources to help reduce fossil fuel consumption and mitigate greenhouse gas emissions to power a sustainable future. Devices presently in use to convert solar energy into thermal ...

NASA instruments image fireball over Bering Sea

March 22, 2019

On Dec. 18, 2018, a large "fireball—the term used for exceptionally bright meteors that are visible over a wide area—exploded about 16 miles (26 kilometers) above the Bering Sea. The explosion unleashed an estimated 173 ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

5 / 5 (2) Oct 05, 2016
Paragraph 4, first sentence: substitute "Newton" for "Einstein." (The video got it right.)
1 / 5 (3) Oct 06, 2016
It is just such articles (and some 'papers') which build myths/legends into the scientific psyche/literature.

But a-LIGO exercise/claims are so potentially flawed, that any pretense to 'scientific detection/discovery' is unjustified.

This is headed for a bicep2-like denouement, where the 'teams' and mainstream are dragged kicking and screaming to admit the whole 'experiment' is flawed.

Like for Bicep2, I made my observations re a-LIGO 'exercise' immediately after announcement/claim of 'detection/discovery'.

Now observers with time/resources are making more in-depth initial critique of the a-LIGO methodology/procedures/claims etc; the 'holes' in which one could 'drive a truck through', being so open to error/artifact.

A recent observer/critique:

not rated yet Oct 09, 2016
It's very reasonable to point out possible sources of error in any experiment and, while I wouldn't like to say either way that the experiment is faulty or that the critique paper is faulty, the stats quoted in the analyses in the paper you cite seem to be extremely coarse-grained, amounting to, "there are lots of these sorts of things happening over the same period of time so the results must be wrong." (For one thing I haven't looked at the logs the author says are publicly available.)

I think that Christopoulos should also have been very much more analytical within a very small time frame around the reported detection if he wanted to be taken seriously. It is pretty easy to imagine that the LIGO scientists could (and should) have taken account of the noise sources that he analyses from the logs - after all, if he can find them, surely they can also and use them for subtraction purposes? Perhaps a refutation analysis will come out in due course?
1 / 5 (1) Oct 09, 2016
What happens when black holes collide?

See the following
1 / 5 (1) Oct 11, 2016
What happens when black holes collide?

See the following

Physicists heads explode.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.