Where is the closest black hole?

Where is the closest black hole?
If you saw this, it would already be too late. Credit: NASA

You know that saying, "keep your friends close, but keep your enemies closer?" That advice needs to go right out the window when we're talking black holes. They're the worst enemies you could have and you want them as far away as possible.

We're talking regions of space where matter is compressed so densely that the only way to escape is to be traveling faster than the speed of light. And as we know, you can't go faster than the speed of light. So… there's no escape.

Get too close to the black hole and you'll be compressed beyond comprehension, perhaps into an infinitely small point.

But you can be reasonably distant from a black hole too, and still have your day ruined. A black hole reaches out through the light years with its gravity. And if one were to wander too close to our Solar System, it would wreak havoc on all our precious planets.

The planets and even the Sun would be gobbled up, or smashed together, or even thrown out of the Solar System entirely.

Black holes are unkillable. Anything you might try to do to them just makes them bigger, stronger and angrier. Your only hope is to just wait them out over the eons it takes for them to evaporate.

It makes sense to keep track of all the out there, just in case we might need to evacuate this Solar System in a hurry.

Where is the closest black hole?
This artist’s impression shows the surroundings of the supermassive black hole at the heart of the active galaxy NGC 3783. Credit: ESO/M. Kornmesser

Where are the closest black holes?

There are two kinds of black holes out there: the at the heart of every galaxy, and the stellar mass black holes formed when massive stars die in a supernova.

The supermassive ones are relatively straightforward. There's one at the heart of pretty much every single galaxy in the Universe. One in the middle of the Milky Way, located about 27,000 light-years away. One in Andromeda 2.5 million light years away, and so on.

No problem, they supermassive ones are really far away, no threat to us.

The stellar mass ones might be more of a problem.

Where is the closest black hole?
Artist’s illustration of Cygnus X-1, a stellar-mass black hole in a binary system. Credit: NASA/CXC/M.Weiss

Here's the problem. Black holes don't emit any radiation, they're completely invisible, so there's no easy way to see them in the sky. The only you'd know there's a black hole is if you were close enough to see the background starlight getting distorted. And if you're close enough to see that, you're already dead.

The closest black hole we know of is V616 Monocerotis, also known as V616 Mon. It's located about 3,000 light years away, and has between 9-13 times the mass of the Sun. We know it's there because it's located in a binary system with a star with about half the mass of the Sun. Only a black hole could make its binary partner buzz around so quickly. Astronomers can't see the black hole, they just know it's there by the whirling gravity dance.

The next closest black hole is the classic Cygnus X-1, which is about 6,000 light-years away. It has about 15 times the mass of the Sun, and once again, it's in a binary system.

The third closest black hole, is also in a binary system.

See the problem here? The reality is that a fraction of black holes are in binary systems, but that's our only way to detect them.

More likely there are more black holes much more close than the ones astronomers have been able to discover.

This all sounds terrifying, I'm sure, and now you've probably got one eye on the sky, watching for that telltale distortion of light from an approaching black hole. But these events are impossibly rare.

The Solar System has been around for more than 4.5 billion years, with all the planets going around and around without interruption. Even if a black hole passed the Solar System within a few dozen light years, it would have messed up the orbits significantly, and life probably wouldn't be here to consider this fact.

We didn't encounter a black hole in billions of years, and probably won't encounter one for billions or trillions more years.

Sadly, the answer to this question is… we don't know. We just don't know if the closest black holes is a few away, or it's actually V616 Mon. We'll probably never know.

Explore further

Rare galaxy with 2 black holes has 1 starved of stars

Source: Universe Today
Citation: Where is the closest black hole? (2016, March 21) retrieved 23 October 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2016-03-closest-black-hole.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Mar 21, 2016
Ugghhhh - I hate bad science or more precisely bad comments.

According to the article: "Even if a black hole passed the Solar System within a few dozen light years, it would have messed up the orbits significantly, and life probably wouldn't be here to consider this fact."

A stellar mass black hole passing within even a dozen light years of the solar system would have no significant impact on the orbits of planets in our solar system. Even at a few light years there would be no impact.

At a distance of a light year there is no difference in the gravitation field of a stellar mass black hole and a stellar mass star. If the critical distance were dozens of light years then any stars closer would have disrupted planetary orbits.

Mar 21, 2016
Even if a black hole passed the Solar System within a few dozen light years, it would have messed up the orbits significantly

How so? Gravitational pull is inversely proportional to the square of distance. The nearest solar system to ours is Alpha Centauri at 4.37 light years. Its two stars add up to two solar masses. The pull from a black hole with 30 solar masses at a distance of 17 light years would be no more than that of Alpha Centauri at 4.37. A black hole of the size of V161 Mon would pull no more than Alpha Centauri at 11 light years. So where does that prediction of significant disruption to our solar system from distances of dozens of light years come from?

Mar 21, 2016
Run the math, at a dozen light years a black hole with a mass of 15.11 solar would have the same effect as the alpha centauri star system (just over 2 solar masses) at 4.365 ly.

I sense a retraction or at least a correction looming in the future.

Mar 21, 2016
From the article: "And if one were to wander too close to our Solar System, it would wreak havoc on all our precious planets."

Because a star wandering too close to our Solar System would be so much more preferable?

Mar 21, 2016

"A close call of 0.8 light years."

Given the absence of 70 kY mega-holes, its Oort objects missed us. Of course, if the pass stirred up our Oort cloud, they'd now be arriving en-masse...

Mar 22, 2016
A black hole would have no more gravity and probably less radiation than the star from which it formed before it became a black hole. In fact, planets of the 'former shining star would still exist, but as cold bodies with solid atmospheres unless internally heated like moons undergoing tidal forces from massive gas giants. The most light in the systems would be from the gas giants if they were massive enough. That said, the polar jets of black holes would give concerns, but planetary discs seem to form normal to the axis of rotation of stars, and black holes would rotate no differently, so black hole jets would be normal to the planes of planetary orbits. As such the jets would not endanger the 'hole's own planets. We will find our Oort clouds are actually large torus's....doughnuts if you will, so these bodies also will not be affected. Normal stars may retain jets of some kind all their lives. Maybe all star systems coplanar with their galaxies.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more