Exploring belief in an animal afterlife

August 3, 2016 by Jordan Bartel
Credit: North Carolina State University

A personal belief in an afterlife for humans is likely to shape belief in an animal afterlife, according to a study by three North Carolina State University College of Veterinary Medicine professors.

In the study titled "Do All Dogs Go to Heaven?" Clinical Science professors Kenneth D. Royal, April A. Kedrowicz and Amy M. Snyder found that of the participants who believed in human afterlife, 73 percent also believed in animal afterlife.

Of the 800 research participants, the groups more likely to believe in the existence of an afterlife for animals are females (51 percent), American Indian/Alaska natives (71.4 percent), African-Americans (58.5 percent), Buddhists (77.3 percent), people living in the South (50.3 percent) and pet owners (45 percent).

"The notion of the human-animal bond is pervasive in the United States," said Dr. Royal. "Yet, Americans are incredibly diverse in terms of their backgrounds, experiences and views. We wanted to explore this issue further by investigating the role that one's religious views might have in understanding this relationship and the value of pets."

The study, set to be published in August in the journal Anthrozoos, is believed to be the first to systematically explore American's beliefs about animal afterlife using a national sample of participants.

Another notable finding: Of 12 different animals presented to the research participants, dogs, cats and horses were rated the most likely to experience an afterlife. Those rated least likely: insects, fish and reptiles.

While the study found widespread belief in an animal afterlife, participants were less certain when asked whether animals have souls: 16 percent stated "definitely no," 16.7 percent stated "probably no" and 19.5 percent were "unsure," compared with 25.8 who stated "probably yes" and 22 percent who said "definitely yes."

Such findings could help guide veterinarians in their interactions with .

"Spirituality and beliefs about animals, including animal afterlife, undoubtedly impact what clients think, how clients feel and what decisions they make," said Dr. Kedrowicz. "So veterinarians should explore and acknowledge client perspectives to build trust and actively engage them in the process of animal care.

"This requires an open approach to communication where the veterinarian asks clients to provide their perspectives with a focused attention to really listening and exploring client meanings and intentions."

Explore further: Beliefs about the soul and afterlife that we acquire as children stick with us, whether we know it or not

Related Stories

Recommended for you

New paper answers causation conundrum

November 17, 2017

In a new paper published in a special issue of the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, SFI Professor Jessica Flack offers a practical answer to one of the most significant, and most confused questions in evolutionary ...

Chance discovery of forgotten 1960s 'preprint' experiment

November 16, 2017

For years, scientists have complained that it can take months or even years for a scientific discovery to be published, because of the slowness of peer review. To cut through this problem, researchers in physics and mathematics ...

9 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

greenonions
4 / 5 (4) Aug 03, 2016
So do bees go to heaven too? What about ants? bacteria? Wonder where the line is drawn.
CockyChocachubra
Aug 03, 2016
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
aksdad
1 / 5 (1) Aug 03, 2016
an open approach to communication where the veterinarian asks clients to provide their perspectives with a focused attention to really listening and exploring client meanings and intentions.

Listening to the client. Huh. Sounds like a good method for communication between any type of service providers and clients. They should write a book, call it something like "How to Win Friends and Influence People."
TheGhostofOtto1923
3.4 / 5 (5) Aug 03, 2016
Well this would only work in cultures where people come back as animals. And then of course there would be an animal afterlife, but it would be in the form of yet another animal, hopefully a domesticated one with a name.

Or some similar rubbish.

Consider that humans are most likely the only animals that know they will eventually grow old and die. For many of them this makes an afterlife imperative, and so its invention was inevitable because it is worth a great deal. But for any dog, cat, horse, or parakeet the notion is pretty worthless.
BendBob
3.7 / 5 (3) Aug 03, 2016
Perhaps a new section should be added to phys.org for those that love a god or profess to follow a god. I mean lamb's blood and the death angel and all that stuff would be in that new section. This would allow the rest of us to not have to close our eyes and wince - knowing the trolls will set their bait and the knee jerks are obligated to kick out.

Perhaps phys.org would name the new section: Faith and Hope!
greenonions
1 / 5 (1) Aug 04, 2016
BendBob - this is said respectfully - and I will expand - you do not have to read the comments section. Perhaps the god vs science topic is one of (or the) most important topic of our times. History is fascinating - and religion has been, and is clearly one of (or the) most divisive forces in our world. Oceans of blood have been spilled in the name of god. The goders always respond by saying that more blood has been spilled by atheists. That is a foolish line of reason - as wars BY atheists, is different than wars in the name of atheism. Wars were certainly not fought in the name of science. So perhaps we are watching up close - the playing out of one of the greatest steps the human race can make - being the transition from a superstitious being - to a rational one. Of course the goders don't like it - they lose control. No one can become President of the U.S. without professing allegiance to Jesus. So Trump - the ultimate narcissist - who clearly has no religious cont.
greenonions
1 / 5 (1) Aug 04, 2016
cont. inclination - has been married 3 times, on the cover of Playboy with a naked model, owns casinos, and a strip bar, and openly cheated on his wives - is now endorsed by the religious right. http://www.thebla...versity/ That tells you how powerful religion is in the U.S. But it is changing, and millenials are the least religious generation in U.S. history - http://www.huffin...998.html
BendBob
3 / 5 (2) Aug 04, 2016
@greenonions: No problem as I am an atheist. I commented, also, out of respect to those that still have "faith and hope." Those are the 2 most lame reasons to believe in a god, imho. Yes, I have read the stats of the declining xtians within the USA, that makes me happy. Let learning and logic drive away the idiocy, opps, sorry those beliefs.
Thanks, for the reply, as for the main point: I do not have to read the comments. I generally read them, or part of them until the believers take over. The amount of comments arguing who is right about a god, or gods is what I would like to see diverted into their own section. Simple, non-science in the non-science area.
I've even had to ask Google News to create a Religion news section so we don't have to see entries for schedules of church service times - ya those are real news stories, NOT!
LifeBasedLogic
Aug 08, 2016
This comment has been removed by a moderator.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.