Enhanced electron doping on iron superconductors discovered

August 15, 2016, Institute for Basic Science
Before and after the attachment of alkaline metals to the surface of iron-based, pniktogen superconductors.

(a) Quantity of momentum of electrons (X) and kinetic energy of electrons (Y) before and after the electron doping : electron doping has changed the distribution of electron kinetic energy.

(b) Fermi surface data before and after the electron doping: nesting condition has been weakened. Credit: IBS

The Institute for Basic Science research team headed by the associate director of CCES, KIM Chang Young, presented the possibility of unifying theories to explain the working mechanism of iron- based superconductors.

Their research was published in Nature Materials on August 16th. Superconductors are a relatively new concept; they were brought to prominence in the late 80's when two Nobel Prize winners discovered a new . The basic principle of superconductivity arises when a superconducting material is cooled to a fairly low critical temperature allowing an electric current to flow without resistance.

Building on a Nobel Prize

The Nobel Prize winners reported their superconducting material - oxides which contain copper and rare earth metals - becomes a superconducting material below -250° Celsius, higher than the previous temperature of -269° Celsius. This led to a boom in developing similar materials for commercial use. Today's research has moved on greatly; oxides are replaced with iron-based which are cheaper to mass produce and also permit a current to flow unabated. To understand the working mechanism of iron-based superconductors scientists have to significantly raise the transition temperatures to source the reason for the increase. Many researchers initially work on the assumption that the nesting effect is a dominant factor, especially in the case of pnictide superconductors {PSD}. Later, scientists discovered another type of superconductor, chalogenide superconductors {CSD}. Since it turned out that CSD is not subject to the nesting effect, the discovery of CSD generated controversy on the mechanism of their superconductivity. The nesting effect states when the surface temperature is increased, electrons become unstable thereby altering their properties both electrically and magnetically, allowing conductors to turn into superconductors.

If the doping is generated by replacing elements, as doping density (concentration) goes up (nesting condition gets worse), critical temperature goes down. In contrast, if the doping is generated by attaching alkaline metals to the surface of the superconductors, critical temperature goes up (nesting condition gets worse). Credit: Institute for Basic Science (IBS)

Rewriting theories with peripheral electrons

Working under the assumption that a strong nesting effect in PSD corresponds to high temperature, the CCES team used potassium (K) and sodium (Na), two alkaline metals with peripheral electrons, thereby facilitating an easy transfer of electrons to other metals. They heated K and Na in a vacuumed environment to excite their atoms whereby the atoms attached to the surface of PSD, which have a lower temperature than the K and Na. As a result electron doping took place on the surface of PSD. The IBS team measured the momentum and kinetic energy of electrons and revealed, for the first time, that there is, in fact, no correlation between superconducting transition and the nesting effect in PSD as is the case in CSD.

Associate director Kim Chang Young said, "Up to now the prevailing theory of PSD and CSD have been thought of as two different systems. Our research is a starting point to confirm that those two superconductors have the same working mechanism, we have laid a cornerstone for the discovery of , whose production cost is low and has no restraints in its current."

Explore further: Finding superconducting needles in the metal haystack

More information: W. S. Kyung, S. S. Huh, Y. Y. Koh, K.-Y. Choi, M. Nakajima, H. Eisaki, J. D. Denlinger, S.-K. Mo, C. Kim and Y. K. Kim (2016) Enhanced Superconductivity in Surface Electron Doped Iron-Pnictide Ba(Fe1:94Co0:06)2As2, Nature Materials, DOI: 10.1038/NMAT4728

Related Stories

New material could advance superconductivity

July 28, 2016

Scientists have looked for different ways to force hydrogen into a metallic state for decades. A metallic state of hydrogen is a holy grail for materials science because it could be used for superconductors, materials that ...

Superconductivity seen in a new light

March 31, 2016

Superconducting materials have the characteristic of letting an electric current flow without resistance. The study of superconductors with a high critical temperature discovered in the 1980s remains a very attractive research ...

New ferromagnetic superconductor—CsEuFe4As4

July 8, 2016

Superconductivity (SC) and ferromagnetism (FM) are mutually antagonistic collective phenomena in solids. Macroscopically, a superconductor expels magnetic fluxes from its interior below the superconducting critical temperature ...

Recommended for you

Information engine operates with nearly perfect efficiency

January 19, 2018

Physicists have experimentally demonstrated an information engine—a device that converts information into work—with an efficiency that exceeds the conventional second law of thermodynamics. Instead, the engine's efficiency ...

Team takes a deep look at memristors

January 19, 2018

In the race to build a computer that mimics the massive computational power of the human brain, researchers are increasingly turning to memristors, which can vary their electrical resistance based on the memory of past activity. ...

Artificial agent designs quantum experiments

January 19, 2018

On the way to an intelligent laboratory, physicists from Innsbruck and Vienna present an artificial agent that autonomously designs quantum experiments. In initial experiments, the system has independently (re)discovered ...

2 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Hyperfuzzy
1 / 5 (1) Aug 15, 2016
When current flows unabated, the nucleus does not produce heat. Heat is atomic motion, the greater the motion the greater the heat and may culminate in radiation or nuclear instability. The motion of the orbiters may also oscillate as other electrons flow nearby. Typically the electron release a time varying field that may be absorbed by another electron, couple this with the passing electron we may achieve lasers. However, for superconductivity all motion that is not part of the current has the ability to create heat. By cooling some materials we neutralize the ability of heat production by limiting the number of atomic states to a minimum. We will create superconductivity at high energy with controls over this energy transfer. Not simple as the easter egg hunt for materials. It requires pure understanding of all the fields and atoms. The near field and the applied fields.
Hyperfuzzy
1 / 5 (1) Aug 15, 2016
Try to understand the constraints on the nucleus and the degrees of freedom by design on the flow at the outer shells. Suggest proper atomic simulation.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.