Longest maths proof would take 10 billion years to read

July 8, 2016
Credit: Charles Rondeau/public domain

An Anglo-American trio presented the prize-winning solution to a 35-year old maths problem Friday, but verifying it may be a problem in itself: reading it would take 10 billion years.

"Boolean Pythagorean Triples" is not a shameful contagious disease, but a long-unsolved enigma within a field called Ramsey Theory.

It was such a brain-teaser that nearly 30 years ago fabled American mathematician Ronald Graham offered a cash prize to anyone who could solve it.

It was only $100, but still.

The self-declared winners—Marijn Heule, Oliver Kullmann and Victor Marek, of the universities of Texas, Swansea and Kentucky, respectively—unveiled their proof at the international SAT 2016 conference in Bordeaux, France.

By their own account, they cracked the puzzle "using Cube-and-Conquer, a hybrid satisfiability testing (SAT) method for hard problems."

As one would.

But colleagues, they acknowledged, needed to see the proof in the pudding, so to speak.

"Due to the general interest in this mathematical problem, our result requires a formal proof," the numbers nutters explained in an abstract.

The resulting string of symbols is equivalent to "all the digitalised texts held by the US Library of Congress," some 200 terabytes of data, according to the newsletter of France's National Centre for Research.

That's two hundred thousand billion octets, for those more comfortable thinking in the base unit for digital information.

The problem itself is (almost) understandable.

It asks if it is possible to colour positive whole numbers (such as 1, 2 or 3) either red or blue such that no sequence of numbers that satisfy Pythagoras's famous equation—a2 + b2 = c2—are the same colour.

If a and b are red, for example, then c could be blue. But all three could not be blue or red.

The proof shows that such a colouring scheme is, in fact, possible—up to the 7,824. Beyond that, however, it doesn't hold.

Crunching the numbers took two days of computer time on the Stampede supercomputer at the Texas Advanced Computing Center.

Explore further: Computer generated math proof is largest ever at 200 terabytes

Related Stories

Mathematician announces that he's proved the ABC conjecture

September 12, 2012

(Phys.org)—In all of history there are very few names that stand out in the field of mathematics, at least among those not in the field: Euclid, Newton, Pythagoras, etc. This is likely due to several reasons, chief among ...

Blog comment, collab help man attack old maths problem

September 26, 2015

Chris Cesare in Nature reported on Friday that Terence Tao successfully attacked the Erdős discrepancy problem by building on an online collaboration. Tao is a professor in the math department at UCLA. He works primarily ...

Recommended for you

New paper answers causation conundrum

November 17, 2017

In a new paper published in a special issue of the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, SFI Professor Jessica Flack offers a practical answer to one of the most significant, and most confused questions in evolutionary ...

Chance discovery of forgotten 1960s 'preprint' experiment

November 16, 2017

For years, scientists have complained that it can take months or even years for a scientific discovery to be published, because of the slowness of peer review. To cut through this problem, researchers in physics and mathematics ...

6 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Shootist
1.4 / 5 (9) Jul 08, 2016
The Nine Billion Names of God - I'll allow the clueless the honor to look up the reference.
Da Schneib
5 / 5 (8) Jul 08, 2016
Now, any questions why we need simulations?

This is duh.
drmudd
5 / 5 (6) Jul 08, 2016
My proof is better. It only takes 5 billion years to read it.
antigoracle
1.5 / 5 (8) Jul 08, 2016
Now, any questions why we need simulations?

This is duh.

What does this proof have to do with simulations?
You are duh.
ElectricBoobVerses
Jul 10, 2016
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
Da Schneib
5 / 5 (2) Jul 10, 2016
What does this proof have to do with simulations?
What exactly do you think simulations are?

Every time you open your gob, you prove how little you know about math, physics, and even basic science.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.