Atmospheric chemistry on paper

July 22, 2016
Rendering of an earth-like exoplanet with atmosphere. Credit: © ESO

Normally computers speed up calculations. But with his new pen-and-paper formula Kevin Heng of the University of Bern, Switzerland, gets his results thousands of times faster than using conventional computer codes. The astrophysicist calculates the abundances of molecules (known as atmospheric chemistry) in exoplanetary atmospheres. Ultimately, deciphering the abundances of molecules allows us to interpret if features in a spectrum are due to physics, geology or biology.

With their sophisticated instruments, astronomers today not only detect new exoplanets outside our solar system but are able to characterize the atmospheres of some of these distant worlds. To know what to anticipate and when to be surprised theorists calculate the expected abundances of molecules. Kevin Heng, director of the Center of Space and Habitability (CSH) at the University of Bern, is an expert in these calculations. "The sun – and other stars – have a very definite proportion of chemical elements like hydrogen, carbon, oxygen or nitrogen", he explains: "And there is a lot of evidence that planets form from the essence of stars." But whereas in stars the elements exist as atoms, in the lower temperatures of exoplanetary atmospheres they form different molecules according to temperature and pressure.

At , for instance, the dominant carrier of carbon is methane (CH4), at it is carbon monoxide (CO). The network of possible chemical reactions is well known but very large. Therefore, conventional calculations are complex and very time-consuming. "I found a way to do this much faster by solving 99% of the problem on paper, before one even touches a computer," says Kevin Heng. "Normally, one solves what we call a system of coupled, non-linear equations. I managed to reduce the problem to solving a single polynomial equation. Effectively, I 'uncoupled' the system of equations on paper, instead of using a computer." Solving this polynomial equation then takes a fraction of the original computer time.

10 milli-seconds instead of a few minutes

"It took me a few months to figure out what is possible", says the astrophysicist. He needed two papers to lay down the foundation for the main result in the third paper that is now accepted for publication in the Astrophysical Journal. "This breakthrough essentially reduces the main part of the program to one line of computer code. Now we can calculate chemistry in 0.01 seconds (10 milli-seconds) instead of a few minutes." A figure showing curves of the relative abundances of various molecules like methane, carbon monoxide, water or ammonium versus temperature demonstrates how accurate the new formula is. "You can almost not tell the difference between my calculations and those with the complicated computer code," summarizes the scientist. No wonder the paper caused a stir in the experts' community even before its official publication.

The new analytical method has several implications. The tremendous speed-up allows for a more thorough exploration of the possibilities when interpreting the spectra of exoplanetary atmospheres. To Heng, what is more exciting is the opportunity for scientific democracy: "It is now easy for any astronomer, around the world, to calculate in exoplanets. One no longer needs to implement a sophisticated . I get a kick out of knowing that this knowledge is instantly transferrable to any other scientist in the world."

Observing the atmospheres of exoplanets, scientists hope to find out how the objects formed and what kind of processes are still taking place. Atmospheric chemistry teaches them how and when to be surprised. Differences between the calculated and the observed abundances of molecules could unveil geological or even biological processes. "Maybe in 20 or 30 years looking at an exoplanetary atmosphere with water, oxygen, ozone and other molecules we can ask whether we see life," says Kevin Heng: "But first we will have to answer the question whether the data can be explained by physics or geology."

Explore further: Understanding clouds as a necessary ingredient in the search for life: The case study of the exoplanet Kepler-7b

More information: Kevin Heng et al. ANALYTICAL MODELS OF EXOPLANETARY ATMOSPHERES. I. ATMOSPHERIC DYNAMICS VIA THE SHALLOW WATER SYSTEM, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series (2014). DOI: 10.1088/0067-0049/213/2/27 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1603.05418

Related Stories

Oxygen in stars

May 2, 2016

Oxygen is the third most abundant element in the universe, after hydrogen and helium. It is an important constituent of the clouds of gas and dust in space, especially when combined in molecules with other atoms like carbon, ...

The effect of starlight on the atmospheres of mini-Neptunes

January 19, 2015

Exoplanet surveys have discovered the first planets with sizes between 2 and 3.5 Earth radii—slightly smaller than the size of the planet Neptune in our solar system. These planets, dubbed "mini-Neptunes," have been spotted ...

Recommended for you

The origin of binary stars

August 21, 2017

The origin of binary stars has long been one of the central problems of astronomy. One of the main questions is how stellar mass affects the tendency to be multiple. There have been numerous studies of young stars in molecular ...

Scientists improve brown dwarf weather forecasts

August 18, 2017

Dim objects called brown dwarfs, less massive than the sun but more massive than Jupiter, have powerful winds and clouds–specifically, hot patchy clouds made of iron droplets and silicate dust. Scientists recently realized ...

3 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

retrosurf
5 / 5 (3) Jul 22, 2016
We are a mess of star stuff.
It's spelled C-H-O-N.
They modelled the reactions
and computed them again.

The reactions form a digraph,
nine gasses are the nodes.
The edges are reactions,
transforming to and fro.

A simple polynomial
with degree of ten
was all they really needed
to compute it all again.



rimifoyi
4 / 5 (1) Jul 22, 2016
The reactions form a digraph,
nine gasses are the nodes.
The edges are reactions,
transforming to and fro.

Thanks.
Nik_2213
5 / 5 (2) Jul 22, 2016
Given the arcane complexities of the interactions, that really is a breakthrough...

{ Hankers back to the late 70's when you could sit down with a pot of coffee plus pen & paper, craft a *real neat* algorithm to solve an apparently intractable contention !! }

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.