Hot, rocky planets may change their composition if rock components vaporize in steam atmospheres that escape to space

June 28, 2016 by Diana Lutz, Washington University in St. Louis
Washington University in St. Louis cosmochemists show that hot, rocky exoplanets with steam atmospheres may vaporize some of their rocky elements and then lose them to space, changing the bulk composition of the planet. Credit: NASA

The media often imply that the goal of the hunt for extrasolar planets is to find a rocky planet about the size of Earth orbiting a star like the sun at a distance that would allow liquid water to persist on its surface. In other words, the goal is to find Earth 2.0.

But there are reasons to be interested in the other worlds even if they couldn't possibly harbor life. The hot, rocky planets, for example, offer rare and precious clues to the character and evolution of the early Earth.

The Kepler satellite has detected more than 100 hot, rocky planets orbiting close to their stars. If these planets formed from interstellar clouds with Earth-like abundances of volatile elements, like hydrogen, water and carbon dioxide, these planets might have steam atmospheres.

Steaming a rocky planet wouldn't just press out the wrinkles. Because the rock-forming elements dissolve in steam to different extents, steaming could, in principle, alter the planet's bulk composition, density and internal structure, especially if all or part of the rock-bearing steam atmosphere was then lost to space.

Bruce Fegley and Katharina Lodders-Fegley, respectively professor and research professor in earth and planetary sciences in Arts & Sciences at Washington University in St. Louis, published models of the chemistry of a steam atmosphere in equilibrium with a magma ocean at various temperatures and pressures in the June 20, 2016 issue of the Astrophysical Journal.

Based on their findings, they have some suggestions for planet hunters—things they might see when they train their telescopes on the hot rocks.

Getting some steam up

The fact that planet hunters have discovered many hot rocks roughly the size of Earth is one of three lines of evidence that come together in this research, Fegley said. The other two are the solubility of silica and other rock-forming elements in steam, and the idea that the early Earth had a steam atmosphere.

The notion that rocks will dissolve in steam may seem outlandish, but it is common knowledge among geologists. "Geologists are mainly concerned with very hot water or water and steam mixtures, whereas we're looking at pure steam and temperatures hundreds of degrees hotter. But it's the same kind of idea," Fegley said.

The suspicion that the early Earth had a steam atmosphere goes back to 1974, when Gustave Arrhenius of the Scripps Institute of Oceanography argued that planetesimals that smacked into the forming Earth got hot enough to melt and release all their volatiles into the atmosphere.

The first to model the steam atmosphere of the early Earth were Yutaka Abe and Takafumi Matsui of the University of Tokyo in 1985. "They were mainly interested in the physics of the problem," Fegley said, "and whether greenhouse gases acting as a thermal blanket would keep the surface molten. I think we're the first ones to do a detailed chemistry on it."

Escaping steam

Fegley and Lodders looked particularly at magnesium, silicon and iron, the three most abundant elements in material that combine with oxygen to form rock—both on Earth and the other terrestrial planets and probably on exoplanets orbiting stars with a composition like our sun's.

The rocky elements enter the atmosphere as hydroxides (Si(OH)4, Fe(OH)2, and Mg (OH)2). Because these oxides have different solubilities in steam, cooking a planet in steam can change its major-element chemistry.

"Potassium, for example, easily goes into steam and if it's lost, you'll lose its radioactive isotope and so change the heat production on the planet," Fegley said.

"If you dissolve more silicon than magnesium, and some of the atmosphere is lost, you can change the ratio of these elements in the planets. This might explain why the ratio of silicon to magnesium in the Earth is about 15 percent smaller than the ratio in the sun, even though the two formed from the same interstellar cloud," he said.

"If you boil off a lot of the silicon, you might end up with a much denser planet than you'd expect. We've found some pretty dense exoplanets," Fegley said. "Sometimes it's crazy high. Earth is about 5.51 g/cm3, but Corot-7b is closer to 10 g/cm3 . . . high enough that it's kind of hard to explain.

"And if you don't lose the atmosphere, when the atmosphere cools down, the rock-forming elements would precipitate out. Since silicon is the rocky element most soluble in , it will be the most abundant, and you'll get a silicate-rich-crust ready-made," he said.

What to look for

Although the scientists are experimenting with numerical models, they remark that their conclusions are testable by observation.

"We're hoping astrophysicists doing mass/radius diagrams to figure out the internal composition of planets will consider compositions other than Earth's," Fegley said.

"We're also hoping space-based spectrometers will be trained on the hot, . Astrophysicists see silicon, magnesium and sodium coming off the atmospheres of hot Jupiters and hot Neptunes but not yet off of hot rocks, which are dimmer and harder to observe," Fegley said.

Intense ultraviolet light from nearby stars is likely to break up hydroxide molecules at the top of atmospheres, the scientists said. The "photoproducts" of these reactions, such as monatomic gases of aluminum, calcium, iron, magnesium and silicon, might be easier to see both because of their abundances and because their spectral lines are less likely be masked by other emissions.

Explore further: Simulations of vaporization of Earth-like planets tell planet-hunters what to look for in atmospheres of super-Earths

More information: Bruce Fegley et al, SOLUBILITY OF ROCK IN STEAM ATMOSPHERES OF PLANETS, The Astrophysical Journal (2016). DOI: 10.3847/0004-637X/824/2/103

Related Stories

What are the chances of life on another planet?

May 9, 2016

In an infinite universe, most scientists agree, the odds of life existing on a planet besides Earth are pretty high. It is unlikely, however, that familiar life forms will be found on any planet within our solar system. Life ...

Earth-like planets have Earth-like interiors

February 8, 2016

Every school kid learns the basic structure of the Earth: a thin outer crust, a thick mantle, and a Mars-sized core. But is this structure universal? Will rocky exoplanets orbiting other stars have the same three layers? ...

Recommended for you

Superflares from young red dwarf stars imperil planets

October 18, 2018

The word "HAZMAT" describes substances that pose a risk to the environment, or even to life itself. Imagine the term being applied to entire planets, where violent flares from the host star may make worlds uninhabitable by ...

Blazar's brightness cycle confirmed by NASA's Fermi mission

October 18, 2018

A two-year cycle in the gamma-ray brightness of a blazar, a galaxy powered by a supermassive black hole, has been confirmed by 10 years of observations from NASA's Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope. The findings were announced ...

Astronomers catch red dwarf star in a superflare outburst

October 18, 2018

New observations by two Arizona State University astronomers using the Hubble Space Telescope have caught a red dwarf star in a violent outburst, or superflare. The blast of radiation was more powerful than any such outburst ...

Magnetic fields may be the key to black hole activity

October 17, 2018

Collimated jets provide astronomers with some of the most powerful evidence that a supermassive black hole lurks in the heart of most galaxies. Some of these black holes appear to be active, gobbling up material from their ...

3 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Maggnus
5 / 5 (5) Jun 28, 2016
Interesting, Gustave Arrhenius is the grandson of Svante August Arrhenius, who first recognized (way back in 1896 or so) that CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere are responsible for the greenhouse effect. Svante was also a Nobel Laureate in chemistry. although he did not win for his research into CO2.

I think it is cool how similar his grandson's studies were. His father (Svante's son) also contributed much to chemistry. Pretty heady legacy!
wduckss
1 / 5 (1) Jun 29, 2016
I would like to share the euphoria but the reality is more attractive me.
We have a model of the Earth and Venus model (body with independent rotation, and body, without self-rotation).
Earth without, crust is melted body (and Venus). From studying the of volcanoes clearly we know that this article is not for base used the real evidence already fiction.
Ascending way of movement of the body is: Mars-Earth-Sun or Mercury-Venus-Sun.
torbjorn_b_g_larsson
5 / 5 (2) Jun 29, 2016
wduckss: Your comment is, again, not readable.

But if you claim that volcano studies (how!?) contradict the research presented here, don't bother. The article wouldn't have passed peer review if the geology was wrong.

Is this the new troll style? Witless criticism without even bothering to make sense?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.