Open Science environment Unicorn allows researchers and decision makers to work together

Open Science environment Unicorn allows researchers and decision makers to work together
Links and interactions between the work packages. Credit: Prof. Pekka Neittaanmäki et. al.

Given that the most important societal needs require multidisciplinary collaboration between researchers and decision makers, a suitable environment has to be provided in the first place. A proposal, prepared by a Finnish consortium and published in the open access journal Research Ideas and Outcomes, suggests a new, open virtual work and modeling platform to support evidence-based decision making in a number of areas, while also abiding by the principles of openness, criticism and reuse.

The Finnish consortium, led by Prof. Pekka Neittaanmäki, University of Jyväskylä, and bringing together Timo Huttula and Janne Ropponen, Finnish Environment Institute, Juha Karvanen and Tero Tuovinen, University of Jyväskylä, Tom Frisk, Pirkanmaa Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment, Jouni Tuomisto, National Institute for Health and Welfare, and Antti Simola, VATT Institute for Economic Research, acknowledge that, "it is not enough that experts push data to politicians."

"There must be practices for mutual communication: experts must answer policy questions in a defendable and useful way; decision makers must more clearly explain their views using evidence; and there must be ICT tools to support this exchange," the authors explain. "The focus is on end-users."

Unicorn is to combine shared practices, tools, data, working environments and concerted actions in order to aggregate open information from multiple databases, and create tools for efficient policy studies.

The consortium have already developed and tested prototypes of such practices and tools in several projects, and insist that they are now ready to apply their experience and knowledge on a larger scale. They are also certain that open data and models are deservedly the "mega trend" nowadays.

"Unicorn directs this trend to paths that are the most beneficial for societal by providing quick, reliable and efficient decision support," they say.

"Significant saving of resources will be manifested with improved data collection, analyses and modeling. Also, the quality and amount of assessments that can be done to support work."

"The major challenges related to evidence-based decision making actually are about changing the practices of researchers and decision makers," according to the authors. Therefore, they see their project as a demonstration of the needed shifts.

Although the approach is applicable in all areas, the researchers are to initially implement them in environment, human health, and regional economy, "as they are complex and challenging enough to offer a good test bed for general development."

Having already been submitted to the Strategic Funds of Academy of Finland in 2015, the Unicorn environment proposal has been rejected due to overambitiousness and low commercial potential. However, the authors are confident that the Unicorn along with its growing community of developers can, in fact, meet a great success. They are currently looking for further funding suggestions and forming new consortiums.

More information: Pekka Neittaanmäki et al, Unicorn–Open science for assessing environmental state, human health and regional economy, Research Ideas and Outcomes (2016). DOI: 10.3897/rio.2.e9232

Provided by Pensoft Publishers

Citation: Open Science environment Unicorn allows researchers and decision makers to work together (2016, May 17) retrieved 19 April 2024 from https://phys.org/news/2016-05-science-environment-unicorn-decision-makers.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Simulation and modelling tool to help decision makers involved in large-scale crisis management

11 shares

Feedback to editors