Study suggests humans are only capable of having five people in their closest circle

May 2, 2016 by Bob Yirka, Phys.org report

social network
Social network diagram. Credit: Daniel Tenerife/Wikipedia
(Phys.org)—A trio of researchers affiliated with the University of Oxford in England and Aalto University School of Science in Finland has conducted a study of human behavior and has found evidence backing up a prior theory that suggests humans have different layers that make up their social circle with different numbers of people in them. In their paper uploaded to the preprint server, arXiv, they describe their study which involved analyzing cell phone records to count calls, what they found and that they believe it means for us a group.

One of the researchers, Robin Dunbar, was part of a team that back in the 1990's studied the correlation between brain size in primates and the number of individuals in their social groups. They found that the bigger the brain, the more members of their groups. More recently, he and colleagues have conducted some experiments that suggest that humans have layers or groups of contacts, with the closet layers having fewer , and the farthest, more. He and his team have suggested that there are actually four layers, which cumulatively contain 5, 15, 50 and 150 people respectively, with the final layer representing the 150 total that was theorized back in the nineties. To give more credence to this theory, the researchers conducted a study of of people living in an undisclosed European country during 2007 (prior to Facebook and smartphones). They narrowed the initial 6 billion calls down to those that involved people who on average called approximately 130 other people, making approximately 10 calls per day. The idea was that people call those that are closer to them more often, thus counting the calls between individuals would reveal how many people were in each of their layers. The team also screened out business and casual calls and also those calls from people that clearly did not use their phone as a means of social contact.

In the end, the team did find clustering that appeared to correlate with their layer theory, with people having on average, 4.1, 11, 29.8, and 128.9 people in their layers, which was small but close to the numbers they had derived for their theory—close enough to fit in with natural variation, they claim. They did find some exceptions to the rule, such as for those people who were clearly extroverts or introverts, which the teams suggests, may mean such people may have an extra layer.

Explore further: Peak friendship—data reveals when you'll be most popular

More information: Calling Dunbar's Numbers, arXiv:1604.02400 [physics.soc-ph] arxiv.org/abs/1604.02400

Abstract
The social brain hypothesis predicts that humans have an average of about 150 relationships at any given time. Within this 150, there are layers of friends of an ego, where the number of friends in a layer increases as the emotional closeness decreases. Here we analyse a mobile phone dataset, firstly, to ascertain whether layers of friends can be identified based on call frequency. We then apply different clustering algorithms to break the call frequency of egos into clusters and compare the number of alters in each cluster with the layer size predicted by the social brain hypothesis. In this dataset we find strong evidence for the existence of a layered structure. The clustering yields results that match well with previous studies for the innermost and outermost layers, but for layers in between we observe large variability.

Related Stories

Peak friendship—data reveals when you'll be most popular

April 6, 2016

Making friends can seem easy when you're young. You encounter more new people and have more free time when you're first venturing out into the world than when you're more likely to be settled down with a steady job, a long-term ...

Phone calls back evolutionary theories of gender

April 19, 2012

Women speak to their male partners less often as they grow older and turn their attention to a younger generation, according to an unusual study Thursday that tracked nearly two billion phone calls and text messages.

Communication with similar people stronger than believed

October 23, 2013

People's tendency to communicate with similar people is stronger than earlier believed, which restricts the flow of information and ideas in social networks. These are the findings that an Aalto University research group ...

Recommended for you

Preventing chemical weapons as sciences converge

November 15, 2018

Alarming examples of the dangers from chemical weapons have been seen recently in the use of industrial chemicals and the nerve agent sarin against civilians in Syria, and in the targeted assassination operations using VX ...

8 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

antigoracle
not rated yet May 02, 2016
Study suggests humans are only capable of having five people in their closet circle

Hmm... I wonder what would happen if they came out of their closet circle.
xponen
not rated yet May 02, 2016
It wrote 4.1 people. Also 4 make more sense because it's the magic number in a lot of things.
compose
May 02, 2016
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
xponen
not rated yet May 03, 2016
Ops, I mean magic like; 4 is the average amount of objects we can keep in working memory, and 4 being mentioned in ancient Greek's pseudoscience. It imply that 4 had psychological significance, although not physical.
eachus
not rated yet May 08, 2016
Ops, I mean magic like; 4 is the average amount of objects we can keep in working memory, and 4 being mentioned in ancient Greek's pseudoscience. It imply that 4 had psychological significance, although not physical.


I think that the reason for the low numbers is that for the closest members of your inner circle, you just speak up, or give them a nudge. ;-) Same goes in business, someone who doesn't travel much seldom calls his secretary, and vice-versa. (Although for CEO-sized offices they may use an intercom.)
compose
May 08, 2016
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
huckmucus
not rated yet May 17, 2016
"In Descent of Man, Darwin observes that the history of man's moral development has been a continual extension in the objects of his "social instincts and sympathies." Originally each man had regard only for himself and those of a very narrow circle about him; later, he came to regard more and more "not only the welfare, but the happiness of all his fellow men"; then "his sympathies became more tender and widely diffused, extending to men of all races, to the imbecile, maimed, and other useless members of society, and finally to the lower animals."" Should Trees Have Standing? - Toward Legal Rights For Natural Objects by Christopher D. Stone. 45 S. Cal. L. Rev. 450 (1972)
huckmucus
not rated yet May 17, 2016
Then there is Justice Scalia's "concentric circles of care." Unfortunately, I don't think he followed it out. Today there is that, and there are those, who lie closer in, posing a greater threat to us and ours than that and those which lie further out. At 7 billion and growing, I think a my sympathies are better placed with a Snail Darter.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.