Hunting for dark matter's 'Hidden Valley'

Hunting for Dark Matter’s ‘Hidden Valley’
Kathryn Zurek. Credit: Roy Kaltschmidt/Berkeley Lab

Kathryn Zurek realized a decade ago that we may be searching in the wrong places for clues to one of the universe's greatest unsolved mysteries: dark matter. Despite making up an estimated 85 percent of the total mass of the universe, we haven't yet figured out what it's made of.

Now, Zurek, a theoretical physicist at the Department of Energy's Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab), says thanks to extraordinary improvements in experimental sensitivity, "We increasingly know where not to look." In 2006, during grad school, Zurek began to explore the concept of a new "Hidden Valley" model for physics that could hold all of the answers to .

"I noticed that from a model-builder's point of view that dark matter was extraordinarily undeveloped," she said. It seemed as though scientists were figuratively hunting in the dark for answers. "People were focused on models of just two classes of , rather than a much broader array of possibilities."

Physicist and author Alan Lightman has described dark matter as an "invisible elephant in the room"—you know it's there because of the dent it's making in the floorboards but you can't see or touch it. Likewise, physicists can infer that dark matter exists in huge supply compared to normal matter because of its gravitational effects, which far exceed those expected from the matter we can see in space.

Since physicist Fritz Zwicky in 1933 measured this major discrepancy in the gravitational mass of a galaxy cluster, that he concluded was due to dark matter, the search for what dark matter is really made of has taken many forms: from deep-underground detectors to space- and ground-based observatories, balloon-borne missions and powerful particle accelerator experiments.

While there have been some candidate signals and hints, and numerous experiments have narrowed the range of energies and masses at which we are now looking for dark matter particles, the scientific community hasn't yet embraced a dark matter discovery.

In 2006, as a graduate student at the University of Washington, Zurek and collaborator Matthew J. Strassler, a faculty member, published a paper, "Echoes of a Hidden Valley at Hadron Colliders," that considered the possibility of new physics such as the existence of a new group of light (low-mass), long-lived particles that could possibly be revealed at CERN's Large Hadron Collider, the machine that would later enable the Nobel Prize-winning discovery of the Higgs boson in 2012.

Some of the scientifically popular hypothetical particle candidates for dark matter are WIMPs (weakly interacting massive particles) and axions (very-low-mass particles). But the possibility of a rich and overlooked mix of light particles was compelling for Zurek, who began to construct models to test out the theory.

"If you had a low-mass hidden sector, you could 'stuff' all kinds of things inside of it," she said. "That really set me up to start thinking about complex dark sectors, which I did as a postdoc."

Looking back to 2008, Zurek said she felt like someone carrying around a sandwich board proclaiming that dark matter could be a stranger, manifold thing than most had imagined. "I was like that little guy with the sign."

By coincidence, the so-called "PAMELA anomaly" was revealed that same year; data from the PAMELA space mission in 2008 had found an unexpected excess of positrons, the antimatter counterpart to electrons, at certain energies. This measurement excited physicists as a possible particle signature from the decay of dark matter, and the excess defied standard dark matter theories and opened the door to new ones.

Now that the concept of "hidden valleys" or "dark sectors" with myriad particles making up dark matter is gaining steam among scientists—Zurek spoke in late April at a three-day "Workshop on Dark Sectors"—she said she feels gratified to have worked on some of the early theoretical models.

"It's great in one sense because these ideas really got traction," Zurek said. "The fact that there were these experimental anomalies, that was sort of a coincidence. As a second- or third-year postdoc, this was like 'my program'—this was the thing I was pushing. It suddenly got very popular."

On an afternoon in late April, Zurek and her student Katelin Schutz sat together waiting to press the button to submit a new paper on a proposal to tease out a signal for light using an exotic, supercooled liquid known as superfluid helium. In the paper, they explain how this form of helium can probe for signals of "super light dark matter," with an energy signature well below the reach of today's experiments.

They are also working with Dan McKinsey, a Berkeley Lab scientist and UC Berkeley physics professor who is a superfluid helium expert, on possible designs for an experiment.

Most popular theories of WIMPs suggest a mass around 100 times the mass of a proton, a particle found at an atom's core, for example, but a superfluid helium detector could be sensitive to masses many orders of magnitude smaller, she said.

Are we any closer to finding dark matter?

Zurek said she is surprised we haven't yet made a discovery, but she is encouraged by the increasing sensitivity of experiments, and she said Berkeley Lab has particular expertise in high-precision detectors that will hopefully ensure its role in future experiments.

"There is a cross-fertilization from different fields of physics that has really blossomed in the last several years," Zurek also said. She joined Berkeley Lab in 2014 after serving as an associate professor at University of Michigan, and has also spent time at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, N.J.; and at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory's Particle Astrophysics Center.

Besides dark matter research, Zurek works on problems related to possible new physics at play in the infant universe and in the evolution of the universe's structure, for example Her work often is at the intersection of particle physics experiments and astrophysics observations.

Hard problems like the dark matter mystery are what drew her to physics at an early age, when she enrolled in college at the age of 15.

"I wanted to understand how the universe worked. Plus, physics was hard and I liked that. I thought it was the hardest thing you could do, which I found very appealing. I decided at 15 that I wanted to make it a career, and I just never looked back," she said.

She knew, too, that she didn't want to work directly on big science experiments. "I had always been fascinated about ideas: Ideas in philosophy, and the interplay between music and philosophy and physics."

She is a classical pianist with the ability to improvise melodies—she refers to this as a "tremendous intuition in how to make sounds"—and she still turns to music when confronting a physics problem. "When you're really stuck on a problem you never stop thinking about it. Sometimes playing the piano helps."

When outdoors, Zurek enjoys sailing, hiking and alpine-style climbing—complete with ice axe and crampons—atop peaks such as Mount Rainer and Mount Shasta.

As for the trail ahead in the dark matter hunt, Zurek said it's important to be nimble and to expect the unexpected.

"You don't want to put yourself at a dead-end where you're not exploring other possibilities," she said.

"The thing we don't want to forget is: We don't know what dark matter is. You have to have room for exploratory experiments, and you probably need a lot of them."

3 Knowns and 3 Unknowns about Dark Matter

What's known

1. We can observe its effects.

While we can't see dark matter, we can observe and measure its gravitational effects. Galaxies have been observed to spin much faster than expected based on their , and galaxies move faster in clusters than expected, too, so scientists can calculate the "missing mass" responsible for this motion.

2. It is abundant.

It makes up about 85 percent of the total mass of the universe, and about 27 percent of the universe's total mass and energy.

3. We know more about what dark matter is not.

Increasingly sensitive detectors are lowering the possible rate at which dark mark matter particles can interact with normal matter.

What's unknown

1. Is it made up of one particle or many particles?

2. Are there "dark forces" acting on dark matter?

Are there forces beyond gravity and other known forces that act on dark matter but not on , and can dark matter interact with itself?

3. Is there dark antimatter?

Could dark matter have an antimatter counterpart, as does normal matter, and is there a similar imbalance that favored dark matter over "dark antimatter" as with normal matter-antimatter?


Explore further

Researchers present a new model for what dark matter might be

More information: Learn more about Kathryn Zurek's research: www.kzurek.theory.lbl.gov/.
Citation: Hunting for dark matter's 'Hidden Valley' (2016, May 24) retrieved 16 July 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2016-05-dark-hidden-valley.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
97 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

May 24, 2016
The majority' of dark matter is quantum particles, that's what space is a quantum particle dimension, of dormant micro charged quantum particles outside of induction environments , the logistical parts supply house for building electrons, neutrons and protons, , hydrogen atom based constructions are a by product of this quantum dimension,

May 29, 2016
Dark matter is made of the same stuff as visible matter except visible matter comes in quantized packages which jump from one quantized state to another emitting radiation.

May 29, 2016
"Is there Dark Antimatter?"
All known non EM interacting matter, namely photons and gravitons, is its own antimatter. Therefore it is likely that DM is, too.
Well maybe its own antiparticle.

May 29, 2016
I keep asking myself why we don't see the 'aether field' or the charge field of Miles Mathis or the neutron sun of Oliver Manuel and the reason I come up with is that in our society there cannot be a 'free' energy while existing energy production requires use and subsequent public payment. It seems that there will be no recognition until and if our science applies the impossible fusion of the atom.
if this 'minute instability' that seems to be behind all science failures is a part of the natural world and it is now, then there will be no fusion and the plan is for war to 'interrupt' our glorious march forward into technology in spite of the successful use of earth energy ley lines in the deep past.
We will begin again in the reconstruction of capitalism as kali Yuga ends in 2025 and Dwapara begins.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more