New models predicting where to find fossils

April 8, 2016 by Robyn Mills

An international team of scientists has developed a way to help locate fossils of long-extinct animals.

Using the estimated ages and spatial distribution of Australian megafauna fossils, the team from University of Adelaide in Australia and Kiel University in Germany built a series of mathematical models to determine the areas in the country most likely to contain fossils.

Published in PLOS ONE, the models were developed for Australia but the researchers provide guidelines on how to apply their approach to assist fossil hunting in other continents.

"A chain of ideal conditions must occur for fossils to form, which means they are extremely rare ─ so finding as many as possible can tell us more of what the past was like, and why certain species went extinct," says project leader Professor Corey Bradshaw, Sir Hubert Wilkins Chair of Climate Change at the University of Adelaide.

"Typically, however, we use haphazard ways to find fossils. Mostly people just go to excavation sites and surrounding areas where fossils have been found before. We hope our models will make it easier for palaeontologists and archaeologists to identify new fossil sites that could yield vast treasures of prehistoric information."

Research student and lead author Sebastián Block and the team made use of modelling techniques commonly used in ecology. They modelled past distribution of species, the geological suitability of fossil preservation, and the likelihood of in the field. They applied their techniques to a range of Australian megafauna that became extinct over the last 50,000 years, such as the giant terror bird Genyornis, the rhino-sized 'wombat' Diprotodon, and the marsupial 'lion' Thylacoleo.

To produce the species distribution models of these long-extinct animals, the researchers used 'hindcasted global circulation models' to provide predicted temperature and rainfall for the deep past, and matched this with the estimated ages of the fossils.

"What we did was build a probability map for each of these layers – the species distribution, the right sort of geological conditions for fossil formation (for example, sedimentary rocks, or caves and lakes), and the ease of discovery (for example, open areas rather than dense forest)," says Professor Bradshaw. "We combined each of these for an overall 'suitability for fossil discovery' map."

"Our methods predict potential fossil locations across an entire continent, which is useful to identify potential areas far from already known sites," says Kiel University's Professor Ingmar Unkel. "It's a good 'exploration filter; after which remote-sensing approaches and fine-scale expert knowledge could complement the search."

The model showed areas south of Lake Eyre and west of Lake Torrens in South Australia and a large area around Shark Bay, Western Australia and other in south-western Australia with a high potential to yield new megafauna fossils.

Explore further: Many species now going extinct may vanish without a fossil trace

More information: Sebastián Block et al. Where to Dig for Fossils: Combining Climate-Envelope, Taphonomy and Discovery Models, PLOS ONE (2016). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151090

Related Stories

Just how good (or bad) is the fossil record of dinosaurs?

August 28, 2015

Everyone is excited by discoveries of new dinosaurs – or indeed any new fossil species. But a key question for palaeontologists is 'just how good is the fossil record?' Do we know fifty per cent of the species of dinosaurs ...

Reconstructing a vanished bird community from the Ice Age

September 9, 2015

Visit Peru's Talara Tar Seeps today and you'll see a desert, but 15,000 years ago, the area was grassland and forest, roamed by dire wolves and saber-toothed cats. If you had gone for a walk in the Talara during the last ...

Recommended for you

Six degrees of separation: Why it is a small world after all

October 19, 2017

It's a small world after all - and now science has explained why. A study conducted by the University of Leicester and KU Leuven, Belgium, examined how small worlds emerge spontaneously in all kinds of networks, including ...

Ancient DNA offers new view on saber-toothed cats' past

October 19, 2017

Researchers who've analyzed the complete mitochondrial genomes from ancient samples representing two species of saber-toothed cats have a new take on the animals' history over the last 50,000 years. The data suggest that ...

Scientists see order in complex patterns of river deltas

October 19, 2017

River deltas, with their intricate networks of waterways, coastal barrier islands, wetlands and estuaries, often appear to have been formed by random processes, but scientists at the University of California, Irvine and other ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (3) Apr 08, 2016
Very Interesting. I guess the key in this whole model is the location of sedimentary rock because most fossils are indeed found in sediment.
That's because [sedimentary] fossils are created by burial in huge amounts of waterborne sand to seal off outside/atmospheric and scavenger influences. For this reason it might be even more productive to raise the bar and look for major catastrophic water flows that might have occurred in the past. If one were to assume the results of a world wide flood of biblical proportions and then work backwards from there it might well produce a much more reliable prediction of the occurrence of such sedimentary bedrock. The results of such a flood are clearly identifiable as all of the major canyons worldwide present clear indicators that they were formed as a result of one or more major catastrophic flow-offs.
Captain Stumpy
5 / 5 (4) Apr 08, 2016
If one were to assume the results of a world wide flood of biblical proportions and then work backwards
uhm... you can't see the logic flaw in that, can you?
if there was a global flood, there would be global evidence and not limited evidence constrained to specific terrain or "geological suitability of fossil preservation" areas... you would only need to consider animal distribution, eh?


more to the point: where did the water go?
where did the evidence go?
why didn't the water take the evidence with it as it is known to actually do when moving - you know - erosion?
(also seen regularly when flooding in major rivers/tsunami takes out populated areas)

why do sheepherders think that plagiarizing a myth regardless of the impossibility of the physics makes sense?



Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.