Astronomers find a star with a record variation period

March 21, 2016
Astronomers found a star with a record variation period
Robotelescope MASTER II, created by a joint force of the Lomonosow Moscow State University, Sternberg Astronomical Institute (GAISh) scientists, and Moscow Union "Optica". Credit: Lomonosow Moscow State University

Three years ago, Lomonosov Moscow State University astronomers detected a bright star TYC 2505-672-1 that has now faded significantly. The scientists assume that TYC 2505-672-1 is actually a double star system, though the nature of its companion remains unknown. An article about the finding was will be published in Astronomy & Astrophysics, and is accessible as a pre-print at Arxiv.

The Russian scientists, working with the global MASTER network of robotic telescopes, determined that the giant star in Leo minor, which was considered to be extinct, had in fact just faded—its brightness had decreased by nearly 100 times.

The MASTER telescope network was constructed by MSU scientists under the guidance of Prof. Vladimir Lipunov for the purpose of detecting and researching the most energetic flashes in the Universe, gamma-ray bursts, a process accompanying formations of black holes and neutron . They also sought thermonuclear flashes on white dwarfs, galactic center flares and quasars. MASTER telescopes have already detected more than 1000 flashes at distances from several hundred to a billion light years away, as well as a number of potentially dangerous asteroids. The telescopes are located near Blagoveshchensk, Irkutsk, Kislovodsk, in the Ural region, the Moscow region, and also in Argentina, the Republic of South Africa and Spain (on the Canary islands).

Initially, the discovery concerning the star's fading did not seem significan. Phenomena of that kind are known to occur. However, why the star dimmed remained a mystery. Diverse hypotheses were suggested, one of which proposed that a red giant following its evolutionary processes emitted a cloud of stardust consisting of carbon particles and hid itself from view.

Astronomers found a star with a record variation period
Automatic telescope 'MASTER-2' of Irkutsk State University, Tunkin valley. Credit: Lomonosov Moscow State University

Later photometric measurements by MASTER-Amur and spectral measurements by the 6-metre BTA-6 telescope determined that the star did not turn red as the sun does before sunset as the atmosphere scatters shorter wavelengths of light. For that reason, the star was tracked attentively, and the researchers observed a return of its luminosity. In October 2014, it recovered to normal levels.

At approximately the same time, Rolf Yansen, Dutch astronomer (Arizona university), drew attention to the star. He revised the data of the Harvard observatory picture library, publicly available since June 2014, and detected that from 1942 to 1945, TYC 2505-672-1 underwent the same decrease in luminosity. According to the scientist's calculations, the star has an unprecedented variation period of 25,245 days, which is about 69 years.

The star became a record-breaker in a length of variation period. According to Denis Denisenko, one of the authors, the previous record belonged to Epsilon Aurigae. Its eclipses repeat over 9890 days, which is a bit more than 27 years. Only five stars are known to have a period of more than ten years. In other words, the new variable star exceeds the existing record by more than two and a half times.

"Ironically, the project MASTER, initially intended for observing fast-occurring phenomena such as gamma-ray bursts and star flashes, discovered an unprecedented variability of a totally different scale," comments Denis Denisenko.

Scientists assume that the star is actually a double system, though they can only speculate on the nature of its companion.

"The scale of the new object is already impressive," says Denis Denisenko. "Giant stars of this spectral class are about three and a half times heavier than the sun. Taking into account the second component, the mass of the system should be around at least four solar masses. The orbital radius of this star should be about 33 astronomical units, and the orbital length should then exceed two hundred astronomical units."

"The system is quite mysterious," Vladimir Lipunov agrees. "We actually see a total eclipse. That means that something totally occults the giant star. Hence, the disc around the second, unseen companion, should be absolutely opaque. But what shines with the same spectrum during the eclipse? That does not seem to be a stardust disc, though, and it can not be another star. If the luminosity of the companion is 100 times lower, then, the companion is a low-mass star. But a low-mass star can not have a size exceeding that of a more massive companion in that double system, and the eclipse would not take place at all, as you can not hide a larger object behind a smaller one."

Explore further: Longest-lasting stellar eclipse discovered

More information: Discovery of an unusual bright eclipsing binary with the longest known period: TYC 2505-672-1 / MASTER OT J095310.04+335352.8.

Related Stories

Image: Hubble checks out a home for old stars

December 21, 2015

This image, taken with the Wide Field Planetary Camera 2 on board the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope, shows the globular cluster Terzan 1. Lying around 20,000 light-years from us in the constellation of Scorpius (The Scorpion), ...

What are the different kinds of supernovae?

March 15, 2016

There are a few places in the universe that defy comprehension. And supernovae have got to be the most extreme places you can imagine. We're talking about a star with potentially dozens of times the size and mass of our own ...

Recommended for you

Sun's eruptions might all have same trigger

April 26, 2017

Large and small scale solar eruptions might all be triggered by a single process, according to new research that leads to better understanding of the Sun's activity.

'Iceball' planet discovered through microlensing

April 26, 2017

Scientists have discovered a new planet with the mass of Earth, orbiting its star at the same distance that we orbit our sun. The planet is likely far too cold to be habitable for life as we know it, however, because its ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (1) Mar 21, 2016
The contention that the companion object needs to be larger than the primary does not hold water. Imagine a massive companion object which acts to magnify a small field of view. If that field is swept near, but not perfectly aligned with the primary, the amplified beam of light will sweep past Earth and the primary will disappear from view. In practice the companion could have a non-uniform gravitational field, or a planet orbiting it which allows some of the light from the primary through. Also note that the primary in this discussion need not be the most massive object.
2.7 / 5 (3) Mar 21, 2016
This is almost suggestive of KC whatever, the so-called alien engineering star. They are both more massive than the sun and undergo mysterious dimming events, except in this case the dimming is regular and periodic.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.