Mystery solved: Explorers Club meal wasn't woolly mammoth

February 3, 2016 byFrank Eltman
A piece of turtle meat is preserved in a glass jar in this photo provided by the Yale Peabody Museum of Natural History, Wednesday, Feb. 3, 2016 in New Haven, Conn. Folklore says this meat was woolly mammoth or giant sloth. But new tests performed by Yale researchers found that a hunk of flesh served at a lavish 1951 Explorers Club dinner in New York featuring "prehistoric meats" was something more mundane - turtle. (Yale Peabody Museum of Natural History via AP)

A Yale researcher says a lavish 1951 dinner in New York City promoted by the Explorers Club didn't actually include 250,000-year-old woolly mammoth, despite folklore about the event.

Nor did the feast for Explorers Club members include meat from an extinct giant sloth, as the menu promised.

A new DNA from a fist-sized piece of meat that survived the soiree at a hotel has shown the morsel was actually green sea turtle meat.

The Explorers Club funded the Yale analysis and says it is pleased with the results.

Will Roseman is executive director of the organization of scientists and others devoted to protecting the planet. He notes that the mindset 65 years ago was much different.

The analysis was published Wednesday in the science journal PLOS ONE.

Explore further: Nintendo to discontinue Club Nintendo rewards program

Related Stories

Google takes stake in Lending Club

May 2, 2013

Internet giant Google said Thursday it has acquired a $125 million minority stake in peer-to-peer online loan company Lending Club.

Recommended for you

Humans in America '115,000 years earlier than thought'

April 26, 2017

High-tech dating of mastodon remains found in southern California has shattered the timeline of human migration to America, pushing the presence of hominins back to 130,000 years ago rather than just 15,000 years, researchers ...

4 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

jsdarkdestruction
2.1 / 5 (7) Feb 03, 2016
Its still possible they ate both sloth and mammoth but they didn't save any of it and the piece they kept was mislabeled and acquired the folklore over time.
Vietvet
4.4 / 5 (7) Feb 03, 2016
@jsdarkdestruction

The NYTs has a better article (no surprise), it was indeed turtle.

http://www.nytime...mtyp=cur
AGreatWhopper
1 / 5 (1) Feb 08, 2016
Just so. Not to mention that his stupid comment doesn't actually make sense. If it was mammoth and sloth then what was passed down wouldn't be folklore.

promile
Feb 09, 2016
This comment has been removed by a moderator.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.