Reflections on the habitability of Earth

February 3, 2016 by Peter Kelley, University of Washington
Astronomers at the UW-based Virtual Planetary Laboratory have created an index to rank the habitability of exoplanets, or those outside the solar system. But what ranking might Earth itself get, if spotted from light-years away? Credit: NASA

We know the Earth is habitable because—well, here we are. But would it look like a good candidate for life from hundreds of light-years away?

Good, but perhaps not great, according to astronomer Rory Barnes of the University of Washington-based Virtual Planetary Laboratory. It's a question, among many others, that he and co-authors asked in a recent paper.

Barnes, a research assistant professor of astronomy, colleagues are drawing up a "habitability index for transiting planets" that ranks exoplanets to help prioritize the search for life.

Astronomers spot possible exoplanets, or those beyond the solar system, not through direct observation but by the dimming of light that happens when the worlds pass in front of, or "transit" their . Many factors go into judging a world's possible habitability, including the amount of energy it gets from its star, the distance and radius of its orbital path and the behavior of its neighbor planets. Spectrometry is used to estimate the mass and radius of the host star, from which astronomers can the estimate the size of the planet itself.

They use this data to create a model of a planet—"an idea of a planet," Barnes said, which is then compared with information about other worlds. "And you basically try and sort out, do I think that could reasonably be a planet that's habitable?"

But validating, or confirming planets is methodical, time-consuming work, and access to the big telescopes needed is expensive. The habitability index helps astronomers rank and prioritize planets to help determine which are worthy of closer study.

Managing these myriad calculations, the index gives the Earth, if observed from afar as we now observe faraway planets, about an 82 percent chance of being right for life.

But wait—only 82 percent?

Why wouldn't the Earth—the single example of a life-hosting world in all our experience—score a perfect, 100 percent rating?

"Basically, where we lose some of the probability, or chance for life, is that we could be too close to the star," Barnes said. "We actually are kind of close to the inner edge of the habitable zone. If we spotted Earth with our current techniques, we would reasonably conclude that it could be too hot for life."

The habitable zone is that swath of space around a star where an orbiting rocky planet might be able to keep liquid water on its surface, thus giving life a chance.

But distance to the host star is only one of many data points Barnes and colleagues account for with the habitability index. Others are the composition of the planet, the details of its orbital path and the behavior of nearby worlds.

In the paper, Barnes and co-authors argue that potential habitability could as effectively be thought of as "a cooling problem." That is, just as there is a habitable zone or "Goldilocks" sweet spot in distance, so too is there one in how successfully a planet sheds energy to maintain the right conditions for on a planet's surface.

So, why doesn't our presence on the Earth, all things considered, earn a perfect, 100 percent score? Because again, here we are, living proof. But the astronomers would not know that, if Earth were spotted hundreds or thousands of light-years away in the Kepler field of vision.

"Remember, we have to think about the Earth as if we don't know anything about it," Barnes said. "We don't know that it's got oceans, and whales and thing like that—imagine it's just this thing that dims some of the light around a nearby star when it passes."

It becomes a sort of sociology question, Barnes said. People would get pretty excited if astronomers did spot an exact Earth twin orbiting an exact Sun twin out there, Barnes allowed.

But if there came a choice between spending money and time to study the Earth twin—so close to the superheated inner edge of its —or another planet located by Kepler with a higher habitability index rating, which should we choose to spend millions on and study?

Sorry, Earth twin.

"The point of the paper is that the other one is the best to spend our time on. Because it's less in danger."

"But," Barnes added, "it's obviously based on this very limited information."

Explore further: Astronomers devise 'habitability index' to guide future search

More information: Comparative Habitability of Transiting Exoplanets.

Related Stories

Can life emerge on planets around cooling stars?

November 20, 2012

(—Astronomers find planets in strange places and wonder if they might support life. One such place would be in orbit around a white or brown dwarf. While neither is a star like the sun, both glow and so could be ...

Astronomers: 'Tilt-a-worlds' could harbor life

April 15, 2014

A fluctuating tilt in a planet's orbit does not preclude the possibility of life, according to new research by astronomers at the University of Washington, Utah's Weber State University and NASA. In fact, sometimes it helps.

Recommended for you

Two new planets discovered using artificial intelligence

March 26, 2019

Astronomers at The University of Texas at Austin, in partnership with Google, have used artificial intelligence (AI) to uncover two more hidden planets in the Kepler space telescope archive. The technique shows promise for ...

Infertility's roots in DNA packaging

March 26, 2019

Pathological infertility is a condition affecting roughly 7 percent of human males, and among those afflicted, 10 to 15 percent are thought to have a genetic cause. However, pinpointing the precise genes responsible for the ...

Facebook is free, but should it count toward GDP anyway?

March 26, 2019

For several decades, gross domestic product (GDP), a sum of the value of purchased goods, has been a ubiquitous yardstick of economic activity. More recently, some observers have suggested that GDP falls short because it ...

Droughts could hit aging power plants hard

March 26, 2019

Older power plants with once-through cooling systems generate about a third of all U.S. electricity, but their future generating capacity will be undercut by droughts and rising water temperatures linked to climate change. ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

5 / 5 (2) Feb 03, 2016
The upshot is that Earth also places less than perfect in other new habitability indexes, meaning life doesn't need perfect conditions.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.