Researchers sequence genomes of parasite that is actually a 'micro jellyfish'

November 16, 2015
Left, myxozoan spores from Kudoa iwatai. Each spore is approximately 10 micrometers in width. Right, the jellyfish Aurelia aurita (moon jelly). The bell is approximately 25 centimeters wide or 2,500 times larger than a myxozoan spore. Credit: Left photo: A. Diamant. Right photo: P, Cartwright

It's a shocking discovery that may redefine how scientists interpret what it means to be an animal.

This week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, researchers at the University of Kansas will reveal how a jellyfish—those commonplace sea pests with stinging tentacles—have evolved over time into "really weird" microscopic organisms, made of only a few cells, that live inside other animals.

Genome sequencing confirms that myxozoans, a diverse group of microscopic parasites that infect invertebrate and vertebrate hosts, are actually are "highly reduced" cnidarians—the phylum that includes jellyfish, corals and sea anemones.

"This is a remarkable case of extreme degeneration of an animal body plan," said Paulyn Cartwright, associate professor of ecology and evolutionary biology at KU and principal investigator on the research project. "First, we confirmed they're cnidarians. Now we need to investigate how they got to be that way."

Not only has the parasitic micro jellyfish evolved a stripped-down body plan of just a few cells, but via data generated at the KU Medical Center's Genome Sequencing Facility researchers also found the myxozoan genome was drastically simplified.

"These were 20 to 40 times smaller than average jellyfish genomes," Cartwright said. "It's one of the smallest animal genomes ever reported. It only has about 20 million base pairs, whereas the average Cnidarian has over 300 million. These are tiny little genomes by comparison."

Despite its radical phasedown of the modern jellyfish's body structure and genome over millions of years, Myxozoa has retained the essential characteristic of the jellyfish—its stinger, or "nematocyst"—along with the genes needed to make it.

"Because they're so weird, it's difficult to imagine they were jellyfish," she said. "They don't have a mouth or a gut. They have just a few cells. But then they have this complex structure that looks just like stinging cell of cnidarian. Jellyfish tentacles are loaded with them—little firing weapons."

The findings are the stuff of scientific fascination but also could have a commercial effect. Myxozoa commonly plague commercial fish stock such as trout and salmon.

"They're a very diverse group of parasites, and some have been well-studied because they infect fish and can wreak havoc in aquaculture of economic importance," Cartwright said. "They cause whirling disease in salmon. The fish start swimming in circles—it's a neurological problem caused by a myxozoan."

Cartwright said the confirmation that myxozoans are cnidarians would necessitate the re-classification of Myxozoa into the phylum Cnidaria. Moreover, these micro jellyfish could expand understanding of what makes up an animal.

"Their biology was well-known, but not their evolutionary origins," she said. "They're microscopic, only a few cells measuring 10 to 20 microns. Some people originally thought they were single-celled organisms. But when their DNA was sequenced, researchers started to surmise they were animals—just really weird ones."

Indeed, Cartwright said traits scientists understood as vital for animal development are absent in Myxozoa.

"Hox genes are one example, which are important to development of all animals, and these lack them," she said. "But Myxozoa is definitely an animal because its evolutionary origin is shared with , and we use species' ancestry to define them. But animals are usually defined as macroscopic multicellular organisms, and this is not that. Myxozoa absolutely redefines what we think of as animal."

While the dramatic changeover from macroscopic marine animal to microscopic parasite seems utterly unique, Cartwright thinks it might reveal a strategy in nature that could be more widespread than previously known.

"If it can happen once in evolution, it certainly can happen again," she said.

Explore further: Researchers find instance of jellyfish benefitting top predators in an ocean ecosystem

More information: Genomic insights into the evolutionary origin of Myxozoa within Cnidaria, PNAS, www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1511468112

Related Stories

Jellyfish venom capsule length association with pain

October 8, 2015

Since the PLOS San Francisco office is a quick car ride from the Monterey Bay Aquarium, so many of us at PLOS have been captivated by jellyfish movements. They are simply mesmerizing to watch as they travel through the water. ...

Deadly jellyfish "milked" to save lives

August 11, 2015

An international research team led by University of Queensland venomologist Associate Professor Bryan Fry has developed a new technique for 'milking' box jellyfish to extract deadly venom for the development into lifesaving ...

Recommended for you

Water striders illustrate evolutionary processes

October 19, 2017

How do new species arise and diversify in nature? Natural selection offers an explanation, but the genetic and environmental conditions behind this mechanism are still poorly understood. A team led by Abderrahman Khila at ...

Gene editing in the brain gets a major upgrade

October 19, 2017

Genome editing technologies have revolutionized biomedical science, providing a fast and easy way to modify genes. However, the technique allowing scientists to carryout the most precise edits, doesn't work in cells that ...

4 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

TheWalrus
5 / 5 (1) Nov 16, 2015
How can they be sure that jellyfish didn't evolve from myxozoans?
NIPSZX
not rated yet Nov 16, 2015
I agree, it would seem more likely for the species to grow bigger than get smaller. At least that is how humans conceive the notion of evolution from Darwin. I guess it could go either way. One quick question, can these Myxozoa infect humans?
jsdarkdestruction
5 / 5 (2) Nov 17, 2015
I dislike how they keep calling it a jellyfish over and over. These quotes show it's an animal in the same phylum as jellyfish and other species like coral and anemones
"Genome sequencing confirms that myxozoans, a diverse group of microscopic parasites that infect invertebrate and vertebrate hosts, are actually are "highly reduced" cnidarians—the phylum that includes jellyfish, corals and sea anemones."

And have a shared ancestry with jellyfish.
""But Myxozoa is definitely an animal because its evolutionary origin is shared with jellyfish, and we use species' ancestry to define them".

Nevertheless, very very interesting stuff here.
barakn
1 / 5 (1) Nov 17, 2015
How can they be sure that jellyfish didn't evolve from myxozoans?

To get from the small genome to the large genome, the likely avenue is genome duplication from a polyploid individual. The extra copies of genes could differentiate and assume different tasks or disappear, but there would still be a lot of leftover evidence that this happened.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.