Rude drivers turn 'good' drivers bad

November 12, 2015 by Sandra Hutchinson, Queensland University of Technology

Rude drivers turn 'good' drivers bad
QUT road safety researcher Lauren Shaw has looked at what turns "good" drivers bad.
"Good" drivers turn bad when faced with poor driver etiquette, according to QUT research which has found many motorists are creating the problem they hate by responding aggressively to rudeness on the roads.

Lauren Shaw, from QUT's Centre for Accident Research & Road Safety - Queensland (CARRS-Q), said there was a widespread belief among drivers that their own on-road performance was good, and they expected other people's driving behaviour to be poor.

"It becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy when drivers respond aggressively to behaviour they think is bad," she said.

"My studies found common on-road events that trigger driver aggression from 'good' drivers were actions like poor merging, cutting off behaviours and tailgating.

"Although these behaviours are all dangerous, the reason they aroused anger was because the receiving driver thought it to be rude, inconsiderate and disrespectful. The offending driver had violated appropriate driver etiquette."

Ms Shaw said typical responses from 'good' but angered drivers, were to sound their horn, flash their lights or verbally vent their frustration.

She said the underlying motivation for these behaviours was to let drivers know they had behaved poorly, so that they would not repeat the behaviour in future.

"It's a contradiction. Good drivers are using rude and unpleasant bad behaviour to teach other drivers how to be better drivers," she said.

"All this does to the driver on the receiving end of the aggressive act is reinforce their own belief that the behaviour of other drivers is bad."

Ms Shaw said other research had also shown that expecting something to happen raises the likelihood that it will happen.

"In this context, drivers become more alert to instances of bad driver behaviour that meet this expectation," she said.

She said almost 40 per cent of drivers surveyed reported verbally venting their frustrations through actions such as name calling and while this might seem physically harmless, research had shown yelling increased driver danger.

"When drivers scream and shout they don't let the negativity go and it actually increases negative emotions and that increases crash risk," Ms Shaw said.

Ms Shaw said the good news was not all drivers reacted aggressively to poor etiquette.

"There are definitely those drivers who feel a level of superiority and perceive themselves as better than the offending , and therefore refuse to respond aggressively," she said.

"These drivers feel that an aggressive response would be lowering their driving standards to that of the bad driver."

Ms Shaw's study focused on looking at the thought processes that promote driver aggression rather than the personality traits that make behave aggressively.

"Driver aggression cannot be blamed on gender or age, it is widespread and linked to how we think about others' behaviours on the road," she said.

Explore further: Attitudes towards cyclists hinges on fellow motorists

Related Stories

Attitudes towards cyclists hinges on fellow motorists

September 15, 2015

A Perth psychologist has delved into the testy relationship between motorists and cyclists, determining drivers are more likely to be unpleasant to bike riders if they think fellow motorists are behaving aggressively towards ...

Don't smile for the camera when sleepy

October 20, 2015

Drowsy drivers who filmed themselves behind the wheel may have unknowingly given road safety researchers the answer to reducing sleepy driving.

Parents make bad call with mobile phone use

November 20, 2014

Hypocritical parents who tell their children not to dial and drive but use their mobile phones behind the wheel are setting a bad example for young drivers, according to QUT road safety researchers.

Over 70 and still driving, who do you listen to?

July 29, 2014

Studies show older drivers self-regulate their actions behind the wheel, but now a QUT road safety researcher is looking to find out who and what influences their driving decisions and how this feedback can improve road safety.

Recommended for you

Coffee-based colloids for direct solar absorption

March 22, 2019

Solar energy is one of the most promising resources to help reduce fossil fuel consumption and mitigate greenhouse gas emissions to power a sustainable future. Devices presently in use to convert solar energy into thermal ...

EPA adviser is promoting harmful ideas, scientists say

March 22, 2019

The Trump administration's reliance on industry-funded environmental specialists is again coming under fire, this time by researchers who say that Louis Anthony "Tony" Cox Jr., who leads a key Environmental Protection Agency ...

The taming of the light screw

March 22, 2019

DESY and MPSD scientists have created high-order harmonics from solids with controlled polarization states, taking advantage of both crystal symmetry and attosecond electronic dynamics. The newly demonstrated technique might ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

5 / 5 (1) Nov 12, 2015
Personally, I think that it is very appropriate to sound your horn and/or blink your lights when someone endangers your life by making unsafe lane changes or merging into traffic improperly.
not rated yet Nov 13, 2015
Just in case anyone wonders why the google cars get rear ended so often.


"We've capped the speed of our prototype vehicles at 25 mph for safety reasons." Yea, right, slower is always safer.

They are the hazard. Yet Google has the nerve to blame others for problems they created.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.