Study is first to map Earth's hidden groundwater

November 16, 2015, University of Victoria
If all the Earth's modern groundwater was pooled above ground, how deep would it be? Credit: Karyn Ho

Groundwater: it's one of the planet's most exploited, most precious natural resources. It ranges in age from months to millions of years old. Around the world, there's increasing demand to know how much we have and how long before it's tapped out.

For the first time since a back-of-the-envelope calculation of the global volume of groundwater was attempted in the 1970s, an international group of hydrologists has produced the first data-driven estimate of the Earth's total supply of groundwater. The study, led by Dr. Tom Gleeson of the University of Victoria with co-authors at the University of Texas at Austin, the University of Calgary and the University of Göttingen, was published today in Nature Geoscience.

The bigger part of the study is the "modern" groundwater story. The report shows that less than six per cent of groundwater in the upper two kilometres of the Earth's landmass is renewable within a human lifetime.

"This has never been known before," says Gleeson. "We already know that water levels in lots of aquifers are dropping. We're using our groundwater resources too fast—faster than they're being renewed."

With the growing global demand for water—especially in light of climate change—this study provides important information to water managers and policy developers as well as scientists from fields such as hydrology, atmospheric science, geochemistry and oceanography to better manage groundwater resources in a sustainable way, he says.

Using multiple datasets (including data from close to a million watersheds), and more than 40,000 groundwater models, the study estimates a total volume of nearly 23 million cubic kilometres of total groundwater of which 0.35 million cubic kilometres is younger than 50 years old.

Why is it important to differentiate old from modern groundwater? Young and old groundwater are fundamentally different in how they interact with the rest of the water and climate cycles. Old groundwater is found deeper and is often used as a water resource for agriculture and industry. Sometimes it contains arsenic or uranium and is often more salty than ocean water. In some areas, the briny water is so old, isolated and stagnant it should be thought of as non-renewable, says Gleeson.

The volume of modern groundwater dwarfs all other components of the active water cycle and is a more renewable resource but, because it's closer to surface water and is faster-moving than old groundwater, it's also more vulnerable to climate change and contamination by human activities.

The study's maps show most modern groundwater in tropical and mountain regions. Some of the largest deposits are in the Amazon Basin, the Congo, Indonesia, and in North and Central America running along the Rockies and the western cordillera to the tip of South America. High northern latitudes are excluded from the data because satellite data doesn't accurately cover these latitudes. Regardless, this area is largely under permafrost with little groundwater. The least amount of modern groundwater is not surprisingly in more arid regions such as the Sahara.

"Intuitively, we expect drier areas to have less young groundwater and more humid areas to have more, but before this study, all we had was intuition. Now, we have a quantitative estimate that we compared to geochemical observations." says Dr. Kevin Befus, who conducted the groundwater simulations as part of his doctoral research at the University of Texas and is now a post-doctoral fellow at the United States Geological Survey.

The next step in painting a full picture of how quickly we're depleting both old and modern groundwater is to analyze volumes of groundwater in relation to how much is being used and depleted.

In a previous study that ultimately led to the investigation of modern groundwater, Gleeson's 2012 groundwater footprint report in Nature mapped global hot spots of groundwater stress, charting rates of precipitation compared to the rates of use through pumping, mostly for agriculture. Some of these hot spots are northern India and Pakistan, northern China, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and parts of the US and Mexico.

"Since we now know how much is being depleted and how much there is, we will be able to estimate how long until we run out," says Gleeson. To do this, he will be leading a further study using a global scale model.

Explore further: Pumping water for irrigation likely to increase drought vulnerability in certain regions

More information: Tom Gleeson et al. The global volume and distribution of modern groundwater, Nature Geoscience (2015). DOI: 10.1038/ngeo2590

Related Stories

Recommended for you

Coffee-based colloids for direct solar absorption

March 22, 2019

Solar energy is one of the most promising resources to help reduce fossil fuel consumption and mitigate greenhouse gas emissions to power a sustainable future. Devices presently in use to convert solar energy into thermal ...

NASA instruments image fireball over Bering Sea

March 22, 2019

On Dec. 18, 2018, a large "fireball—the term used for exceptionally bright meteors that are visible over a wide area—exploded about 16 miles (26 kilometers) above the Bering Sea. The explosion unleashed an estimated 173 ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (4) Nov 16, 2015
As lay as it can get: When there are Floods, Instead of letting the Water Flowing towards the Oceans, USE MAGNETS, Whatever they are to Pull it all up. Of course, Obviously, Certainly NOT HEAT!
1 / 5 (3) Nov 16, 2015
As lay as it can get: When there are Floods, Instead of letting the Water Flowing towards the Oceans, USE MAGNETS, Whatever they are to Pull it all up. Of course, Obviously, Certainly NOT HEAT!

The Porous Liquid can hold Vast amounts of hazardous gases.
So also, find out what will draw water up magnetically....without use of Heat Energy.
Atomic fission can destroy a Huge City!
5 / 5 (2) Nov 17, 2015

Wow, man...lay off the meds/alcohol. Or at least reread your posts before hitting the 'Submit' button. You are making absolutely no sense whasoever.
3.4 / 5 (5) Nov 17, 2015
It takes 16 teslas to levitate a small ball of water. The Large Hadron Collider couldn't even hold back a gallon of spilled milk.

You may as well be saying the solution to the water crisis is the magic wormhole free energy spark plug from Atlas Shrugged.
1 / 5 (2) Nov 17, 2015
Since it may not be possible to levitate water anytime soon, for lack of such technology....Something else has to be attempted. FOR THAT WE NEED ABUNDANT, FREE, RENEWABLE ENERGY.
U.S stores oil underground so as to make sure that oil supply to customers cannot be threatened by outside forces. So also, it is imperative that we make underground chambers ready in areas where we don't live and are supposed to see flash floods. Just suck it up all!
Then distribute them to other underground chambers. So, we have to focus on obtaining as much Renewable Energy as possible first. Algal, Turbinal, Solar, Hydro approaches should be utilized to Max. Transparent Solar Panels above oceans, Wind Turbines there...The goal should be to become Popeye in Energy!
3 / 5 (4) Nov 17, 2015
The technology exists to levitate water now, you just don't realize how grossly energy inefficient it would be to levitate water out of the earth. Just get it out of the air portion of the water cycle. That technology exists now too, all over the place.
1 / 5 (1) Nov 24, 2015
(In North America) Build 100 1000 megawatt fission plants and sufficient desalination plants to use the bulk of the power generated. Inject de-ionized fresh water into known aquifers until they are artesian. Every fresh water problem known, solved.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.