November 20, 2015 report
Dental analysis suggests Homo floresiensis was a separate species from modern man
The child-sized skeletal human-looking fossils found on Flores began to be referred to as the remains of a Hobbit when it was discovered that they belonged to fully grown human-like creatures. Standing at just 0.9 meters when alive, the hobbits would have been considerably smaller than modern humans, or even other human cousins that have since gone extinct. Researchers have found the remains of nine of the skeletons, the bones of which have been found to be approximately 18,000 years old—together the discovery has caused much debate about whether the creatures were a species separate from modern humans, or if they were modern human that had simply suffered from microcephaly—a condition that leads a person to have a small body and head, and also some degree of retardation. To help settle the debate the researchers with this new effort undertook a serious examination and analysis of the creatures' teeth.
In all, the researchers looked at 40 teeth—their analysis consisted mainly in comparing and contrasting them with teeth from 490 modern humans from across the globe and with teeth from extinct human cousins. Their efforts reveled that the teeth were similar in size to those of modern humans who were short in stature, but other features were quite dissimilar—some of the traits were similar to those found in other early hominins, while others were similar to those seen in more advanced hominins. Because of the dissimilarities with modern humans, the researchers reject the notion that the teeth belonged to modern humans and instead suggest they more likely belonged to a species that had derived from Homo erectus—they likely became smaller due to living with limited resources on an island, aka, the island effect.
Homo floresiensis is an extinct, diminutive hominin species discovered in the Late Pleistocene deposits of Liang Bua cave, Flores, eastern Indonesia. The nature and evolutionary origins of H. floresiensis' unique physical characters have been intensively debated. Based on extensive comparisons using linear metric analyses, crown contour analyses, and other trait-by-trait morphological comparisons, we report here that the dental remains from multiple individuals indicate that H. floresiensis had primitive canine-premolar and advanced molar morphologies, a combination of dental traits unknown in any other hominin species. The primitive aspects are comparable to H. erectus from the Early Pleistocene, whereas some of the molar morphologies are more progressive even compared to those of modern humans. This evidence contradicts the earlier claim of an entirely modern human-like dental morphology of H. floresiensis, while at the same time does not support the hypothesis that H. floresiensis originated from a much older H. habilis or Australopithecus-like small-brained hominin species currently unknown in the Asian fossil record. These results are however consistent with the alternative hypothesis that H. floresiensis derived from an earlier Asian Homo erectus population and experienced substantial body and brain size dwarfism in an isolated insular setting. The dentition of H. floresiensis is not a simple, scaled-down version of earlier hominins.
© 2015 Phys.org