Orangutan females prefer dominant, cheek-padded males

September 1, 2015, Springer
Flanged male Credit: Bkp Bain

Unlike most mammals, mature male orangutans exhibit different facial characteristics: some develop large "cheek pads" on their faces; other males do not. A team of researchers studied the difference in reproductive success between cheek-padded males and males without cheek pads. They found that those with cheek pads are significantly more successful in fathering offspring.. The findings are published in Springer's journal Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

The research team led by Graham L. Banes and Linda Vigilant of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology studied the of Kusasi, the former dominant male at Camp Leakey in Indonesia's Tanjung Puting National Park. They compared his achievement with that of socially subordinate, non-cheek-padded males from the same area by collecting faecal samples and performing paternity testing. During his decade as "king" of the jungle, Kusasi became a father more often than any other male. Only during periods of rank instability, in the beginning and at the end of Kusasi's dominance, did other males succeed in fathering offspring.

Typically, only one male orangutan in any given area - the dominant one - has cheek pads. Along with increased body size and a large, pendulous throat sac (used to bellow resonant 'long call' vocalizations) these cheek pads are characteristic of dominant males. They are suspected to make them more attractive to females, resulting in greater reproductive success compared to non-cheek-padded rivals. But males without cheek pads are also known to be capable of fathering offspring - and have done so prolifically in zoos and in the wild.

"Dominant males have to find and consume more calories. Their movement is restricted as a result of their size, and fights with neighbouring dominant males have been known to result in death," says Banes. "So, why would a male develop cheek pads if he can father offspring without?"

To answer this question, Banes spent eight years studying the orangutans of Tanjung Puting National Park, collecting faecal samples from all orangutans observed in the 50 km² study area. The researchers extracted DNA from these samples and identified 39 known individuals, including 12 males.

"We performed paternity testing to see which of these males were fathering offspring at Camp Leakey, and to quantify Kusasi's reproductive success", says Vigilant. "Paternity could be assigned to 14 candidate offspring, conceived across multiple decades, ten of which were fathered by Kusasi."

The results show that Kusasi fathered many more offspring than any other male during his tenure as , potentially as a result of his handsome-looking cheek pads attracting female orang-utans. As expected, non-cheek-padded males were also shown to have achieved paternities.

"The timing, however, was interesting," says Banes. "These other males were typically reproductively successful at the beginning and end of Kusasi's dominant period, when the hierarchy was potentially unclear."

From this, the authors conclude that cheek pad development is an evolutionarily stable strategy: reproductive success is significantly skewed in favour of dominant, cheek-padded males, while other simply bide their time until periods of rank instability.

Explore further: Mountain gorilla mamas sidestep having inbred offspring

More information: "Male orang-utan bimaturism and reproductive success at Camp Leakey in Tanjung Puting National Park, Indonesia." Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, DOI: 10.1007/s00265-015-1991-0

Related Stories

Mountain gorilla mamas sidestep having inbred offspring

May 20, 2015

Some mountain gorilla females linger into adulthood in the group into which they were born. In the process they also remain in the company of their father, who is often their group's dominant male. To curb inbreeding, though, ...

Who's your daddy? If you're a gorilla, it doesn't matter

June 17, 2015

Being the daddy isn't important for male gorillas when it comes to their relationships with the kids; it's their rank in the group that makes the difference, says new research published in Animal Behaviour. The authors of ...

Recommended for you

How living systems compute solutions to problems

January 17, 2018

How do decisions get made in the natural world? One possibility is that the individuals or components in biological systems collectively compute solutions to challenges they face in their environments. Consider that fish ...

Scale-eating fish adopt clever parasitic methods to survive

January 17, 2018

Think of them as extra-large parasites. A small group of fishes—possibly the world's cleverest carnivorous grazers—feeds on the scales of other fish in the tropics. The different species' approach differs: some ram their ...

Why don't turtles still have tail spikes?

January 17, 2018

We're all familiar with those awesome armored giants of the Jurassic and Cretaceous periods - Stegosaurus and Ankylosaurus - and their amazing, weaponized tails. But why aren't similar weaponized tails found in animals living ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

4 / 5 (4) Sep 01, 2015
Antigoracle must be celebrating. He might not die a virgin after all. Have to pity the orangutan though.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.