As power grows, so does generosity

July 30, 2015 by Terry Kosdrosky, University of Michigan

The saying "power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely" is so pervasive it's taken as fact.

Certainly there are plenty of examples of abuse, but new research from University of Michigan professor Leigh Tost finds that those in power, in certain situations, actually show more generosity in their financial and resource decisions.

"This is part of a stream of research I'm working on that undermines the assumed association between power and corruption," said Tost, assistant professor of management and organizations at the Ross School of Business. "This popular perception is only part of the story. We also see people who hold their power with much more of a sense of social responsibility."

Tost's study, published in the journal Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, examines how this dynamic works.

A series of experiments by Tost and colleagues gave test subjects the ability to allocate resources, mostly money, between themselves and others, and the experimenters varied the amount of power participants felt during the studies. The results indicated that when people were aware that their decisions would impact other people in the future, those induced to feel more powerful actually behaved more generously, not less.

"We found that when people experience power and are aware of future others' dependence on them, they feel a sense of responsibility," Tost said. "Rather than being corrupt, they're more generous and think more long-term."

Business executives make resource allocations all the time. There are constant tradeoffs when deciding how much of an organization's limited resources to invest into enhancing short-term profitability rather than enhancing the company's long-term viability.

Tost's research suggests that when decision makers are reminded that future generations will be affected by present-day actions, they are likely to be more prosocial in their decision making.

People like Warren Buffett and Bill Gates—who spend much of their vast wealth helping to solve social problems—are high-profile examples, but people need not be rich or control many resources to make these decisions.

"Many small decisions you make in your own life have an impact on someone in the ," Tost said. "Being aware of that activates the mechanisms we found in the study. It's something for everyone to think about."

Tost's co-authors on the study were Kimberly Wade-Benzoni of Duke University and Hana Huang Johnson of the University of Idaho.

Explore further: Power can increase generosity to future generations, according to research

More information: Study: Noblesse oblige emerges (with time): Power enhances intergenerational beneficence, … ii/S0749597815000205

Related Stories

Power can corrupt even the honest

October 1, 2014

When appointing a new leader, selectors base their choice on several factors and typically look for leaders with desirable characteristics such as honesty and trustworthiness. However once leaders are in power, can we trust ...

Recommended for you

Galactic center visualization delivers star power

March 21, 2019

Want to take a trip to the center of the Milky Way? Check out a new immersive, ultra-high-definition visualization. This 360-movie offers an unparalleled opportunity to look around the center of the galaxy, from the vantage ...

Ultra-sharp images make old stars look absolutely marvelous

March 21, 2019

Using high-resolution adaptive optics imaging from the Gemini Observatory, astronomers have uncovered one of the oldest star clusters in the Milky Way Galaxy. The remarkably sharp image looks back into the early history of ...

When more women make decisions, the environment wins

March 21, 2019

When more women are involved in group decisions about land management, the group conserves more—particularly when offered financial incentives to do so, according to a new University of Colorado Boulder study published ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Jul 31, 2015
I looked up the paper. It is pseudoscience. They used subjects "recruited from Qualtrics, an organization that manages an online national survey pool". In these they a brief induced sense of "power". They then jump to conclusions about "today's powerful actors" and "CEOs defrauding investors to politicians engaging in various forms of moral hypocrisy". There is no connection between a brief induced sense of power and that achieved by many years of struggle and which is real not experiment induced and "as if" when examined via a questionnaire.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.