The cosmic start of lightning

July 1, 2015
A cosmic particle produces a particle shower, which generates free electrons. As soon as these electrons are available, a streamer discharge starts growing from a large hailstone, where the electric field of a thunder cloud is amplified. Credit: CWI.

Even though lightning is a common phenomenon, the exact mechanism triggering a lightning discharge remains elusive. Scientists at the Dutch national research institute for mathematics CWI, the University of Groningen and the University of Brussels now published a realistic model involving large ice particles and cosmic rays.

The big picture of lightning is clear: charge separation occurs inside a thundercloud and is eventually short-circuited by a conductive tube of ionized . However, the electric field inside these clouds is usually an order of magnitude too low to create the conductive tube. This is why lightning is first out of the 'top ten questions in lightning research', according to a recent review.

Lightning researchers at CWI (Amsterdam), the University of Groningen (KVI-CART), and the University of Brussels now claim to have cracked this question. Large ice particles or hydrometeors form the first ingredient of their model. These grow out of hailstones moving up and down in the turbulent air inside thunderclouds. When they grow in an elongated shape, this will focus the electric field inside the cloud on their tips. The increased electric field is high enough to accelerate and start an ionization cascade, necessary to create a conductive tube.

Simulations showed that ice particles of 6 cm length and a narrow, elongated shape would increase the electric field enough to cause discharge inception. Estimates from the literature suggest such hydrometeors occur inside thunderclouds in a density of roughly 0.1 m-3.

Normally there are too few free electrons present in the surrounding air to cause a discharge.  However, these could be provided by high energy , which can generate large showers of free electrons. Computer simulations showed that in an electric field of 3 meters high and 0.2 km2, one air shower per minute of free electrons capable of discharge inception would occur.

In short, free electrons from air showers caused by entering the atmosphere are accelerated in the electric field at the tip of a hydrometeor, and form self-propagating tubes of ionized air. These conductive tubes can short-circuit the built-up charge difference inside a thundercloud, between clouds or between a cloud and the earth's surface. The results, presented in a Physical Review Letters paper, show that this mechanism for discharge inception is realistic.

The proposed model would predict that lightning inception at higher altitudes (e.g. 12 km) is less likely, as the hydrometeors would have to be longer to reach the required density, while electron density in air showers caused by cosmic particles is lower at this altitude.

If these results are confirmed, a big question will have been solved. However, professor of particle physics Olaf Scholten, says there are still plenty of questions remaining. "Our institute is using data from large radio telescopes, like the Dutch Low Frequency Array LOFAR, to study and increase our understanding of this phenomenon." Future projects include studying the in clouds and the location of the discharge inside a cloud.

The study was partly funded by the project 'Creeping Sparks' from Technology Foundation STW and 'Cosmic Lightning' from the Foundation for Fundamental Research on Matter (FOM).

Explore further: Exploding stars help to understand thunderclouds on Earth

More information: 'Prediction of lightning inception by large ice particles and extensive air showers', Physical Review Letters, 30 June 2015. dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.015002

Related Stories

Exploding stars help to understand thunderclouds on Earth

April 22, 2015

How is lightning initiated in thunderclouds? This is difficult to answer - how do you measure electric fields inside large, dangerously charged clouds? It was discovered, more or less by coincidence, that cosmic rays provide ...

Morning is the time for powerful lightning

March 17, 2015

Wherever you are, if it's 8 a.m. it's time for the kids to be in school, time perhaps for a second cup of coffee, and time for the most powerful lightning strokes of the day.

Recommended for you

Camera able to capture imagery of an optical Mach cone

January 23, 2017

(Phys.org)—A team of researchers at Washington University in St. Louis has built a camera apparatus capable of capturing moving imagery of an optical Mach cone. In their paper published in the journal Science Advances, ...

Experiment resolves mystery about wind flows on Jupiter

January 23, 2017

One mystery has been whether the jets exist only in the planet's upper atmosphere—much like the Earth's own jet streams—or whether they plunge into Jupiter's gaseous interior. If the latter is true, it could reveal clues ...

4 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

cantdrive85
2 / 5 (4) Jul 01, 2015
Many of the reasons which make lightning "mysterious" and "elusive" are the same reasons folks skeptical of Electric Universe claim the EU is not possible and defies physics. But there is the lightning, occurring every minute of the day around the planet. A better understanding of electric/plasma discharge (such as lightning, solar, cometary, etc..) will one day lead to a better understand of the entire Universe around us.
RobertKarlStonjek
not rated yet Jul 01, 2015
This research seems to assume that lightening starts in the clouds and projects down to the ground but a build up of static always occurs in the area where lightening will strike and the lightening bolt projects both from the ground to the cloud and the cloud to the ground.

This has been know for quite some time, why is it ignored here? Maybe their work applies to lightening between clouds rather from could to ground?
JeanTate
4 / 5 (4) Jul 02, 2015
@cd:
Many of the reasons which make lightning "mysterious" and "elusive" are the same reasons folks skeptical of Electric Universe claim the EU is not possible and defies physics. But there is the lightning, occurring every minute of the day around the planet. A better understanding of electric/plasma discharge (such as lightning, solar, cometary, etc..) will one day lead to a better understand of the entire Universe around us
Yeah, but ...

"the eu" seems to be anti-science: despite its leaders having worked on it for ~40+ years, nothing substantive has been produced, no *quantitative* papers, no *quantitative* analyses, nothing actually citing Alfven (for example) ... and no sign of any intention to change course.

For example, among the tens (hundreds?) of thousands of fans, surely there are enough people who could undertake independent research, using publicly available data? Or people who could organize such projects? Yet huge effort is wasted on moronic YT videos!
JeanTate
5 / 5 (4) Jul 02, 2015
@cd (continued): one more huge opportunity "the eu" has completely missed out on: online citizen science projects. The Zooniverse (https://www.zooniverse.org/#/ ) may be the best known, for its Galaxy Zoo etc, but there are others (e.g. https://cosmoques...craters/ ). These seem to me to be perfect for the tens (hundreds?) of thousands of eu fans, to get their hands dirty with actual data, and simple analyses. And for "electrical theorists" to build an online citizen scientist project of their own (if they can master making slick, but moronic, YT vids, they can certainly learn how to create such a project).

To me, this apparent lack of interest in actually *doing* science is one of the things that leads me to conclude that "the eu" is actually an anti-science, quasi-religious cult ...

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.