Impact crater or supervolcano caldera?

Impact crater or supervolcano caldera?
Siloe Patera. Credit: ESA/DLR/FU Berlin, CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO

At first glance, the region covered by this latest Mars Express image release appears to be pockmarked with impact craters. But the largest structure among them may hold a rather explosive secret: it could be remains of an ancient supervolcano.

The images presented here were taken by the high-resolution stereo camera on ESA's Mars Express on 26 November 2014, and focus on the Siloe Patera feature in the Arabia Terra region of Mars.

Siloe Patera comprises two large nested craters, close to the centre of the main colour image. The outer rim measures about 40 x 30 km and, at its deepest point, the crater dips as low as 1750 m below the surrounding plains.

Some scientists believe that Siloe Patera and a number of similar features in Arabia Terra are calderas, the collapsed centres of volcanoes. But not just any volcanoes: these are thought to be martian supervolcanoes.

On Earth, a supervolcano is defined as a volcano that can produce at least 1000 cubic kilometres of volcanic materials in an eruption – thousands of times larger than 'normal' volcanic eruptions and powerful enough to alter global climate. An example is the Yellowstone caldera in the United States.

Supervolcanoes occur when magma is trapped below the surface, leading to a huge built up in pressure. They erupt suddenly in violent explosions and thus do not 'grow' sloping mountains like Olympus Mons. That makes them hard to identify, especially millions or billions of years later. 

Impact crater or supervolcano caldera?
Siloe Patera in context. Credit: NASA MGS MOLA Science Team

But a number of irregularly shaped craters have been detected in the Arabia Terra region that could represent a family of ancient supervolcano calderas.

Siloe Patera is one such example. It is characterised by two depressions with steep-sided walls, collapse features and low topographic relief. The two depressions could even represent two different eruptive episodes due to collapse as the underlying magma pressure was released, or as the magma chamber migrated below the surface.

By comparison, impact craters include features such as a central peak, uplifted crater rims and ejecta blankets surrounding them. Indeed, are widespread in this scene: textbook examples can be found in the two side-by-side craters just above Siloe Patera, and in the large crater at the far right of the scene. These craters each exhibit a central peak, terraced crater walls and a surrounding ejecta blanket.

An impact crater with depth to diameter ratio comparable to Siloe Patera would be expected to show these features – unless perhaps the crater had undergone extensive erosion or modification – but it does not. 

Looking in more detail at Siloe Patera, as shown in the perspective view, numerous small channels and gullies are seen, cut into the walls and partly flowing into the depression. A prominent valley-like feature is present in the foreground, which cuts into the depression on one side.

Impact crater or supervolcano caldera?
Perspective view of Siloe Patera. Credit: ESA/DLR/FU Berlin, CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO

The valley, along with numerous other small channels in the immediate vicinity, appears to cut through material to the lower left of the craters that could be either ejecta from an impact or volcanic flow.

If it is impact ejecta, then its asymmetric distribution could be explained either by an oblique meteoroid impact or by selective erosion of the blanket. Alternatively, it could be the product of lava flow from this part of the caldera.

Impact crater or supervolcano caldera?
Siloe Patera in 3D. Credit: ESA/DLR/FU Berlin, CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO

Arabia Terra is already known to comprise plains of fine-grained, layered sulphate- and clay-bearing materials. The source of the material has been much debated, but lava and dust from eruptions could be the explanation.

Without any doubt, more data and high-resolution coverage – and even in situ sampling – would be necessary to resolve this mystery. And since the gases released in supervolcano eruptions could have had significant effects on the martian climate, this is a topic of great interest.


Explore further

Mars crater may actually be ancient supervolcano, study says

Citation: Impact crater or supervolcano caldera? (2015, May 21) retrieved 22 April 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2015-05-impact-crater-supervolcano-caldera.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
591 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

May 21, 2015
Electrical scaring. No debate there.

May 21, 2015
Scared of electricity?

You are correct - no real debate here.

May 21, 2015
Scared of electricity?

You are correct - no real debate here.

You need not be scared of electricity gkam, it's your friend.

May 23, 2015
Electrical scaring. No debate there.

LAME

May 23, 2015
@Psily_T

Sorry about the down vote, I meant to give you a "5".

May 24, 2015
The surface is clearly electrically scarred. There are multiple contact points in the crator itself and around it
@mark
there is no evidence supporting your conclusions, nor is there anything but your insistence that the visual effects look similar to something you saw once
evidence of that nature (eye-witness testimony or personal conjecture) are the poorest form of evidence that can be had from a scientific perspective

also, there would be evidence left over from the process that can be seen with examinations of the matter or area. given the size of said crater, there would be far more evidence than you can imagine that would not only be visible from Earth, but especially from the probes and satellites around Mars (especially the more recent ones)

the conclusions must remain tied to where the evidence points whether you "clearly" see something or not

i suggest further reading here: http://ocw.mit.edu/index.htm

May 25, 2015
This image shows the original larger crater with a secondary crater positioned on the first's perimeter. This is a common pattern seen in discharges to dusty surfaces. The surrounding radiating, raised plateaus and scalloped edges are also common traits of discharges. All of these attributes are seen clearly in Olympus Mons, with multiple circularly excavated craters, always with the smaller one over the larger's perimeter... the only possibility in an electrical mechanism.

May 27, 2015
This is a common pattern seen in discharges to dusty surfaces
@rossim
i will say it again: there is no reliable evidence supporting electrical or plasma discharge formation of the caldera/crater.
just because it looks like something you saw once doesn't mean you have empirical evidence

case in point: CD's arguments about eu and electrical/plasma discharge forging the moon craters and grand canyon
IF said discharge forged the craters/canyon, then there would be evidence we would be able to see, measure, or detect (there isn't)
plus, there is the simple observed fact that we've seen meteors slamming into the moon forming craters
there is also doubt about the size/scaling of your speculations
the only possibility in an electrical mechanism
it still seems highly implausible and you've not been able to present a viable mechanism
nor has there been observed supporting evidence in space

i prefer to wait for more and better evidence


Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more