Statistical analysis reveals Mexican drug war increased homicide rates

April 2, 2015, American Statistical Association

A new statistical analysis suggests that, in the short term, the Mexican government's war against drugs increased the average murder rate in regions subjected to military-style interventions.

The study—"Did the Military Interventions in the Mexican Drug War Increase Violence?"—was conducted by Valeria Espinosa, a quantitative analyst at Google and a 2014 doctoral graduate of Harvard University's statistics department, and Donald B. Rubin, Harvard University John L. Loeb Professor of Statistics.

The paper is published on the website of The American Statistician, a journal of the American Statistical Association (ASA). The ASA is the nation's oldest and largest organization of professional statisticians.

The Mexican government—beginning in December 2006 during former President Felipe Calderón's term and continuing through current President Enrique Peña Nieto's administration—has been fighting an internal war against drug traffickers. A 2013 report by Human Rights Watch estimates 60,000 people were killed between 2006 and 2012 as a result of the military interventions and drug cartels fighting each other for control of territory.

To determine the drug war's effect on the homicide rate in the affected areas, the study compares the homicide rate in the first year after the military intervention in each affected region to the expected homicide rate for that same year had there not been an intervention.

Espinosa and Rubin conducted statistical analyses of 18 regions affected by military interventions. Those regions—designated by the name of their major city—are Tijuana, Nogales, Madera, Juárez, Pánuco, Reynosa, Bustamante, Guadalupe, Villa de Cos, Teúl, Rincón de Romos, Sinaloa, Tepic, La Piedad, Celaya, Apatzingán, Coahuyana and Acapulco.

Espinosa and Rubin used public data compiled by three well-respected sources in Mexico for their analysis:

  • National Institute of Statistics and Geography, the country's national statistical agency
  • Center of Research for Development, a nonprofit think tank that conducts research and proposes policy options for Mexico's economic and democratic development
  • Official website of Mexican President Felipe Calderón (2006-2012)—NOTE: This data, no longer publicly available, was publicly accessible until the end of Calderón's term in December 2012

The duo analyzed the data to determine whether military interventions in the country's regions increased the homicide rates beyond what the expected homicide rate would have been without the interventions. For the purposes of the study, an intervention is defined as a confrontation between government forces and organized crime that resulted in three or more civilian deaths; in addition to its normal definition, civilians also could refer to drug cartel members.

Because the Mexican military operations were directed at municipalities rather than entire states, the authors defined regions of analysis to be a municipality that received the intervention as well as its neighboring municipalities.

This study is more statistically rigorous than two previous articles about drug war death rates published in Nexos, a leading cultural and political magazine in Mexico. Those articles, authored by Fernando Escalante Gonzalbo and José Merino, were published in January and June 2011, respectively. Escalante relied on visual comparisons, while Merino used a less rigorous causal analysis to estimate the effect of the interventions.

When policymakers are faced with critical decisions, it is important they are basing their decisions on causal effects, not associations, said Espinosa. The statistical methodology used in this study will enable policymakers to compare intervened regions with other similar regions, not simply the past or national averages. Unfortunately, many studies that claim to measure causation forget the fundamental step of explicitly showing that their units are comparable—in our case, that the regions are actually similar. Our paper emphasizes the importance of such balance checks, explained Espinosa.

Study findings suggest military interventions resulted in an average increase of nearly 11 homicides per 100,000 inhabitants across the 18 affected regions studied. However, the estimated effects vary considerably across these regions.

"The results of our study suggest that military interventions in the Mexican drug war increased homicide rates in the short term, especially in the Juárez region," said Espinosa. "While the effect on short-term is only one factor Mexican policymakers must account for when deciding whether and where to send troops, measuring the effect accurately should increase their ability to find the optimal tradeoff between short-term violence and long-term objectives."

Of the 18 affected regions, only Rincón de Romos and Apatzingán experienced a significant reduction in the homicide rate relative to what would have been expected without the military intervention.

Conversely, the Juárez region experienced an increase in its homicide rate that is estimated to be more than twice as large as that of any other region in the study. This finding should not be surprising. Since the 1990s, Ciudad Juárez has been notorious for displays of violence, such as more than 1,000 unsolved murders of young women between 1993 and 2003, and for being a major center of narcotics trafficking linked to the Juárez Cartel.

Removing the Juárez region, the analysis still yields a significant increase in the homicide rate. Specifically, the estimated regional average intervention effects with and without Juárez are 11.0 and 6.5, respectively.

Explore further: The economics of fear

More information: www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/1 … 2014.965796#abstract

Related Stories

The economics of fear

June 30, 2014

When he worked in Africa, development economist Ariel BenYishay noticed small-scale entrepreneurs were often unable to grow their businesses beyond the initial stage, even when the opportunities were obvious.

Recommended for you

Excavators find tombs buried in Bolivia 500 years ago

November 17, 2018

Archaeologists say they found tombs at a Bolivian quarry containing remains from more than 500 years ago that give an insight into the interaction of various peoples with the expanding Inca empire.

Preventing chemical weapons as sciences converge

November 15, 2018

Alarming examples of the dangers from chemical weapons have been seen recently in the use of industrial chemicals and the nerve agent sarin against civilians in Syria, and in the targeted assassination operations using VX ...

5 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

malcolm_kyle
3 / 5 (2) Apr 03, 2015
Prohibition has finally run its course; the lives and livelihoods of hundred's of millions of people (users and non-users) worldwide have been destroyed or severely disrupted; many countries that were once shining beacons of liberty and prosperity have become toxic repressive smoldering heaps of hypocrisy and a gross affront to fundamental human decency. It is now the duty of every last one of us to insure that the people who are responsible for this shameful situation are not simply left in peace to enjoy the wealth and status that their despicable actions have, until now, afforded them. Former and present Prohibitionists should not be allowed to remain untainted or un
MR166
1 / 5 (2) Apr 03, 2015
This movement to legalize drugs is just part of a greater plan to destroy the moral fiber of the western nations and especially the US. God has become a four letter word, two parent families are almost looked down upon and any action is considered OK just as long as they do not convict you of any crime. The moral decay of our bankers and politicians just reflect the moral decay of the country in general.

We are quickly adopting an every man for himself attitude in the US that will destroy us quicker than any external enemy.
MR166
not rated yet Apr 03, 2015
Our decay is highlighted by the proliferation of gambling in the US. I am not saying that it should be illegal to gamble but just that governments view it as a legitimate source of jobs and revenue instead of the parasitic drain on the populace that it is.
MR166
3 / 5 (2) Apr 03, 2015
Oh Yea,,,, did the paper take into account the fact that the Obama administration shipped thousands of guns to the drug cartels under the "Fast and Furious" program?
barakn
1 / 5 (1) Apr 03, 2015
Gambling is just the invisible hand of the free market finding a way to entertain people.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.