High mountains warming faster than expected

April 23, 2015
Elevation-dependent warming is a poorly observed phenomenon that requires urgent attention to ensure that potentially important changes in high mountain environments are adequately monitored by the global observational network," say members of the Mountain Research Initiative Working Group. Credit: Douglas Hardy, UMass Amherst

High elevation environments around the world may be warming much faster than previously thought, according to members of an international research team including Raymond Bradley, director of the Climate System Research Center at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. They call for more aggressive monitoring of temperature changes in mountain regions and more attention to the potential consequences of warming.

"Elevation-dependent is a poorly observed phenomenon that requires urgent attention to ensure that potentially important changes in high mountain environments are adequately monitored by the global observational network," say members of the Mountain Research Initiative Working Group in the current issue of Nature Climate Change.

High mountains are the major water source for large numbers of people living at lower elevations, so the social and of enhanced warming in mountain regions could be large, the researchers add. "This alone requires that close attention be paid to the issue. In addition, mountains provide habitat for many of the world's rare and endangered species, and the presence of many different ecosystems in close proximity enhances the ecological sensitivity of mountains to environmental change."

Lead author Nick Pepin of the University of Portsmouth, U.K., says, "There is growing evidence that high mountain regions are warming faster than lower elevations and such warming can accelerate many other environmental changes such as glacial melt and vegetation change, but scientists urgently need more and better data to confirm this. If we are right and mountains are warming more rapidly than other environments, the social and economic consequences could be serious, and we could see more dramatic changes much sooner than previously thought."

UMass Amherst's Bradley adds that without substantially better information, there is a risk of underestimating the severity of a number of problems, including water shortages and the possible extinction of some alpine flora and fauna.

He says, "We are calling for special efforts to be made to extend scientific observations upwards to the highest summits to capture what is happening across the world's mountains. We also need a strong effort to find, collate and evaluate observational data that already exists wherever it is in the world. This requires international collaboration."

Records of weather patterns at high altitudes are "extremely sparse," the researchers found. There are very few weather stations above 14,700 feet (4,500 m), and long-term data, crucial for detecting patterns, doesn't yet exist above 16,400 feet (5,000 m) anywhere in the world. The authors say the longest observations above this elevation are from the summit of Kilimanjaro, which have been maintained for more than a decade by Douglas Hardy of UMass Amherst.

For this study, Pepin, Bradley and colleagues reviewed elevation-dependent warming mechanisms such as loss of snow and ice, increased latent heat release at high altitudes, low-elevation aerosol pollutants that increase the difference in warming rates between low and high elevations, plus other factors that enhance warming with elevation in different regions, and in different seasons.

They discuss future needs to improve knowledge of mountain temperature trends and mechanisms via improved observations, satellite-based remote sensing and model simulations. Noting that "many factors make it extremely difficult to determine the rate of warming in mountainous regions," the team reports the most striking evidence that are warming more rapidly than surrounding regions comes from the Tibetan plateau, where temperatures have risen steadily over the past 50 years and the rate of change is accelerating.

This research team with members from the U.K., U.S., Switzerland, Canada, Ecuador, Pakistan, China, Italy, Austria and Kazakhstan, came together as part of the Mountain Research Initiative, a mountain global change research effort funded by the Swiss National Foundation.

Explore further: Mountain system artificially inflates temperature increases at higher elevations

More information: Elevation-dependent warming in mountain regions of the world, Nature Climate Change 5, 424–430 (2015) DOI: 10.1038/nclimate2563

Related Stories

A mountain bird's survival guide to climate change

June 8, 2010

Researchers at Yale University have found that the risk of extinction for mountain birds due to global warming is greatest for species that occupy a narrow range of altitude. In fact, a species' vertical distribution is a ...

Researchers find new evidence of warming

February 9, 2015

A study of three remote lakes in Ecuador led by Queen's University researchers has revealed the vulnerability of tropical high mountain lakes to global climate change - the first study of its kind to show this. The data explains ...

Recommended for you

Carbon coating gives biochar its garden-greening power

October 20, 2017

For more than 100 years, biochar, a carbon-rich, charcoal-like substance made from oxygen-deprived plant or other organic matter, has both delighted and puzzled scientists. As a soil additive, biochar can store carbon and ...

Cool roofs have water saving benefits too

October 20, 2017

The energy and climate benefits of cool roofs have been well established: By reflecting rather than absorbing the sun's energy, light-colored roofs keep buildings, cities, and even the entire planet cooler. Now a new study ...

4 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Mike_Massen
4.5 / 5 (8) Apr 23, 2015
Suggests glaciers which so far haven't melted much or gained some volume may have that situation reversed, it appears consistent with this data too:-
http://images.rem...ies.html

For anyone who appreciates thermal resistivity, the above link correlates well with that observed when you add a blanket such as over your body on a cool night and has the fortune to use one of this infra red remote temperature sensors, ie Those with a laser pointer. Shows definitively just why temps which increase at lower altitudes are consistent with temps dropping at much higher altitudes, as per the link etc

Those that have a burgeoning interest in Science might review whats available as lots of instrumentation is now cheaper than ever, especially those remote IR laser pointer based temp sensors...
antigoracle
1.5 / 5 (8) Apr 23, 2015
More HOCKEY SCHTICK AGW Cult "science" from good old Ray.
jazzy_j_man
5 / 5 (2) Apr 25, 2015
Keep buggering yourself anti...there's gold in them thar hills! I really want to meet you. Are you a coward?

I don't get the constant obsession with "yuck. computer models", from the illiterati. Somewhere they're making some assumption that's so far off base that I can't even pick it. Please help.

1). All hypotheses are models. All models' authors describing how they would work in reality is an "as if" simulation. It's what we do when we build hypotheses.
2). People have programmed computers to immitate that activity. Obviously, it's not the same, but, how is it different?

a). People are not consistent and make errors; a computer simulation will dispassionately apply the algorithm without error.
b). The devil is in the details, and it is often too onerous to do that manually; a computer simulation can do a lot of brute force number crunching.
c). You can't look at all the assumptions, constants and variables in peoples' logic. You can with a computer program.
jazzy_j_man
5 / 5 (1) Apr 25, 2015
Now, a simulation is not proof, regardless of who is doing it. It is an "as if" model that says, "this might be how things are working". You then collect data to reinforce or refute the hypothesis.
I agree that they jump the shark saying, "A computer simulation has demonstrated how xyz happened", as opposed to "A computer simulation has demonstrated how xyz could have happened". That's just poor writing and doesn't reflect on computer models.
Collecting that data is a lot of work and costly. Funny, that's what the illiterati are always screaming. So, you really think some alpha-primate's arm chair musing are really more reliable than his/her explicitly externalizing that thought process for others to look at, and a computer to simulate, before spending those monies?

Frankly, my best guess is that it's pure sophistry. Just one of their (many) boilerplate arguements that have zero intellectual integrity.

No, then address the aforementioned...specifically.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.